Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder controversies: Difference between revisions
→Religious and Social critics: remove scientology bashing, in general I'm all for bashing religions but that source is absolutely nothing to do with adhd |
→Religious and Social critics: my mistake, source is relevant, but still thinkg 'not afraid of hyperbole' is just bashing them |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
==Religious and Social critics== |
==Religious and Social critics== |
||
According to an article in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', "the uproar over Ritalin was triggered almost single-handedly by the Scientology movement."<ref name="LA Times">{{cite news | first=Joel | last=Sappell | coauthors= Welkos, Robert W. | url=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-scientology062990a,1,6085874,full.story?coll=la-news-comment | title=Suits, Protests Fuel a Campaign Against Psychiatry | work=[[Los Angeles Times]] | page=A48:1 | date=[[1990-06-29]] | accessdate=2006-11-29}} Backup copy [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/la90/la90-6b.html link here]</ref> The [[Citizens Commission on Human Rights]], an [[anti-psychiatry]] group formed by Scientologists in 1969, conducted a major campaign against Ritalin in the 1980s and lobbied Congress for an investigation of Ritalin.<ref name="LA Times" />. Scientology publications identified the "real target of the campaign" as "the psychiatric profession itself" and claimed the campaign "brought wide acceptance of the fact that (the commission){{sic}}<!-- formatting as in original Times article --> and the Scientologists are the ones effectively doing something about [...] psychiatric drugging".<ref name="LA Times" /> Scientology states "the controversy over the many deaths and irreversible damage caused by psychiatric drugs prescribed for children labeled with... ADHD continues to grow".<ref>[http://www.freedommag.org/english/vol37I1/reallifehorrors.htm Real-Life Horrors Fuel Growing Outrage Over Deadly ADHD Drugs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> The church contends that mental disorders are a "fraud"<ref>[http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/07/01/sci_psy/ Scientology's war on psychiatry - Salon.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>, "mental and behavioral problems are largely incorrect diagnoses that cover symptoms and don't handle the real problems, which may be physical or spiritual". |
According to an article in the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', "the uproar over Ritalin was triggered almost single-handedly by the Scientology movement."<ref name="LA Times">{{cite news | first=Joel | last=Sappell | coauthors= Welkos, Robert W. | url=http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-scientology062990a,1,6085874,full.story?coll=la-news-comment | title=Suits, Protests Fuel a Campaign Against Psychiatry | work=[[Los Angeles Times]] | page=A48:1 | date=[[1990-06-29]] | accessdate=2006-11-29}} Backup copy [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Library/Shelf/la90/la90-6b.html link here]</ref> The [[Citizens Commission on Human Rights]], an [[anti-psychiatry]] group formed by Scientologists in 1969, conducted a major campaign against Ritalin in the 1980s and lobbied Congress for an investigation of Ritalin.<ref name="LA Times" />. Scientology publications identified the "real target of the campaign" as "the psychiatric profession itself" and claimed the campaign "brought wide acceptance of the fact that (the commission){{sic}}<!-- formatting as in original Times article --> and the Scientologists are the ones effectively doing something about [...] psychiatric drugging".<ref name="LA Times" /> Scientology states "the controversy over the many deaths and irreversible damage caused by psychiatric drugs prescribed for children labeled with... ADHD continues to grow".<ref>[http://www.freedommag.org/english/vol37I1/reallifehorrors.htm Real-Life Horrors Fuel Growing Outrage Over Deadly ADHD Drugs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> The church contends that mental disorders are a "fraud"<ref>[http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/07/01/sci_psy/ Scientology's war on psychiatry - Salon.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>, "mental and behavioral problems are largely incorrect diagnoses that cover symptoms and don't handle the real problems, which may be physical or spiritual".<ref>http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,595091823,00.html?pg=3</ref> |
||
Critics from the [[Anti-Psychiatry]] movement such as [[Fred Baughman]] and [[Peter Breggin]]<ref>[http://www.antipsychiatry.org/ritalin.htm Talking Back to Ritalin-New Breggin Book Excerpts<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.antipsychiatry.org/readingl.htm An Anti-Psychiatry Reading List<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.stopshrinks.org/reading_room/antipsych/reading_list.html Online Dictionary of Mental Health<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.stopshrinks.org/reading_room/frame_docs/1st_idx_4th.html TOC - Antipsychiatry Reading Room<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> have extensively used the popular media to criticize ADHD and medications used for ADHD. They have also testified at Congressional hearings on the use of Ritalin and supported legal challenges such as the [[Ritalin class action lawsuits]]. Both doctors had associations with Scientology in the past but neither belongs to the church.<ref>[http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm/5319 Kurt Cobain - Citizens Commission on Human Rights<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://h11.protectedsite.net//index.cfm/5314/5976 Psychiatric Drugs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.cchr.com/index.cfm/8060 Error<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref name=scientologyfaq>[http://faq.scientology.org/ritalin.htm Why are Scientologists opposed to the use of Ritalin? The President of the Church of Scientology Answers Your Questions<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.breggin.com/ritalin.html Ritalin Information: Side Effects, Cautions, Alternatives, ADD, ADHD<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.freedommag.org/english/vol38i/page30.htm The Child Protection Racket; Freedom Magazine<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> There is an antipsychiatry movement that often refers to their writings, but in contrast to scientolgists, they are not "anti-psychiatry," but critics of some of its practices. |
Critics from the [[Anti-Psychiatry]] movement such as [[Fred Baughman]] and [[Peter Breggin]]<ref>[http://www.antipsychiatry.org/ritalin.htm Talking Back to Ritalin-New Breggin Book Excerpts<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.antipsychiatry.org/readingl.htm An Anti-Psychiatry Reading List<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.stopshrinks.org/reading_room/antipsych/reading_list.html Online Dictionary of Mental Health<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.stopshrinks.org/reading_room/frame_docs/1st_idx_4th.html TOC - Antipsychiatry Reading Room<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> have extensively used the popular media to criticize ADHD and medications used for ADHD. They have also testified at Congressional hearings on the use of Ritalin and supported legal challenges such as the [[Ritalin class action lawsuits]]. Both doctors had associations with Scientology in the past but neither belongs to the church.<ref>[http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm/5319 Kurt Cobain - Citizens Commission on Human Rights<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://h11.protectedsite.net//index.cfm/5314/5976 Psychiatric Drugs<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.cchr.com/index.cfm/8060 Error<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref name=scientologyfaq>[http://faq.scientology.org/ritalin.htm Why are Scientologists opposed to the use of Ritalin? The President of the Church of Scientology Answers Your Questions<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.breggin.com/ritalin.html Ritalin Information: Side Effects, Cautions, Alternatives, ADD, ADHD<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.freedommag.org/english/vol38i/page30.htm The Child Protection Racket; Freedom Magazine<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> There is an antipsychiatry movement that often refers to their writings, but in contrast to scientolgists, they are not "anti-psychiatry," but critics of some of its practices. |
Revision as of 21:03, 2 September 2008
The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. |
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a developmental, neurobehavioural disorder, widely recognized by the medical and scientific community as causing impairment, especially in children. Attention deficit–hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remains a controversial disorder, despite it now being a well validated clinical diagnosis.[1] Continued claims that the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder deserve greater scrutiny are made by some news sources, social critics, religions, and individual medical professionals. The United Kingdom's "Every Child Matters" websites states that ADHD is a "controversial diagnosis". [2] . Ethical and legal issues with regard to treatment have been key areas of concern for these critics. [1]
While stimulant medications are widely considered safe when used as prescribed, critics point to the the UN's International Narcotics Control Board issued warnings in 1996 and the dramatically increased use of methylphenidate at that time in the United States although the use of medication has since leveled off.[3] There was also concern that the use of Ritalin was being actively promoted by an influential parent association, which had received significant financial contributions from the preparation's leading United States manufacturer.[4][5]
These critics contend that ADHD can be better explained by other theories such as the Hunter vs. farmer theory. Other critics such as those critics who believe in the social construct theory of ADHD disagree over the cause of ADHD, question research methodologies[6] are skeptical toward its classification as a mental disorder,[7] and wonder about the effects of diagnosis on the mental state of patients.[8][9] Critics point to changing standards of diagnosis, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) issuing a more careful set of standards in 2000 to aid clinicians than merely using DSM-IV.[10] Certain religions and groups, especially Scientology also hold fringe viewpoints about the disorder. Scientologists are against almost all aspects of psychiatric practice, and are highly skeptical that the diagnosis denotes a genuine impairment. Those critical of Scientology believe that much of the controversy generated about ADHD is manufactured.
Concerns about medication
The National Institute of Mental Health states that, "stimulant drugs, when used with medical supervision, are usually considered quite safe".[11] PBS believes that, "stimulants, unlike most psychiatric medications, are very well-studied drugs and, at this point, well-trusted by doctors"[12]. Individual parents and individual professionals have raised questions about the side effects of drugs and their long term use.[13] Critics are concerned that medication is sometimes resold by patients and then used a recreational drug in a manner to induce a high. Critics also point out that Ritalin is used as an study aid by some students without an ADHD diagnosis.[14]
Concerns over funding of ADHD doctors and lobby groups
In 2008 it was revealed that Dr. Joseph Biederman of Harvard, failed to report to Harvard that he had received 1.6 million dollars from drug companies between 2000 and 2007.[15] E. Fuller Torrey, executive director of the Stanley Medical Research Institute which finances psychiatric studies, said “In the area of child psychiatry in particular, we know much less than we should, and we desperately need research that is not influenced by industry money.”[16]
Controversial Alternative theories of ADHD
There are several fringe theories that have attempted to explain ADHD. The most popular theory is the Hunter vs. farmer theory which believes that those with ADHD still have older "hunter characteristics". The Neurodiversity theory believes that ADHD is a term that describes a difference of behavior and that this difference should be celebrated.
Concerns about Overdiagnosis
While studies indicate that ADHD is in fact under diagnosed social critics continue to state that the disorder is diagnosed far too often. Much of the criticism does not reject the concept of ADHD as a valid disorder, but alleges, that children with problematic behaviour are often diagnosed with ADHD, while the cause of the behaviour may be from another source. Majority scientific opinion believes in the validity of the diagnosis and does not believe that the rate of error in the diagnosis is a major concern. Still, social critics state that these children may often have different more complex problems or that their problems caused by the environment. They see that the child is normal but just not in the way that responsible adults want them to behave. Social critics make the connection between the extra money that schools receive for children with ADHD and the increase in the diagnosis.
Media coverage of the ADHD controversy
The media have reported on various ADHD controversies and on the views of individuals and organisations who have controversial opinions.
In 2001 PBS's Frontline ran a five-part TV series entitled "Medicating kids".[17] The program included a selection of interviews with representatives of various points of view. In one segment, entitled backlash, ADHD critics Fred Baughman and Peter Breggin, who PBS described as "outspoken critics who insist [ADHD is] a fraud perpetrated by the psychiatric and pharmaceutical industries on families anxious to understand their childrens' behavior,"[18] were interviewed on the legitimacy of the disorder. Russell Barkley and Xavier Castellanos, then head of ADHD research at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), defended the viability of the disorder. In Castellanos's interview he stated how little is scientifically understood.[19] Lawrence Diller was interviewed on the business of ADHD along with a representative from Shire Plc.
A number of notable individuals have given controversial opinions on ADHD. Scientologist Tom Cruise's interview with Matt Lauer was widely watched by the public. In this interview he spoke about postpartum depression and also referred to Ritalin and Adderall as being "street drugs" rather than as ADHD medication. In England Baroness Susan Greenfield, a leading neuroscientist,[20] wanted a wide-ranging inquiry in the House of Lords into the dramatic increase in the diagnosis of ADHD in the UK and possible causes[21] following a 2007 BBC Panorama programme which highlighted US research (The Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD by the University of Buffalo showing treatment results of 600) suggesting drugs are no better than therapy for ADHD in the long-term. Other notable individuals such as Terence Kealey, a clinical biochemist, has given a controversial opinion outside of their field of expertise. He believes ADHD medication is used to control unruly boys' behaviour.[22] Newspaper columnists such as Benedict Carey have also written controversial articles on ADHD.[23][24]
Religious and Social critics
According to an article in the Los Angeles Times, "the uproar over Ritalin was triggered almost single-handedly by the Scientology movement."[25] The Citizens Commission on Human Rights, an anti-psychiatry group formed by Scientologists in 1969, conducted a major campaign against Ritalin in the 1980s and lobbied Congress for an investigation of Ritalin.[25]. Scientology publications identified the "real target of the campaign" as "the psychiatric profession itself" and claimed the campaign "brought wide acceptance of the fact that (the commission) [sic] and the Scientologists are the ones effectively doing something about [...] psychiatric drugging".[25] Scientology states "the controversy over the many deaths and irreversible damage caused by psychiatric drugs prescribed for children labeled with... ADHD continues to grow".[26] The church contends that mental disorders are a "fraud"[27], "mental and behavioral problems are largely incorrect diagnoses that cover symptoms and don't handle the real problems, which may be physical or spiritual".[28]
Critics from the Anti-Psychiatry movement such as Fred Baughman and Peter Breggin[29][30][31][32] have extensively used the popular media to criticize ADHD and medications used for ADHD. They have also testified at Congressional hearings on the use of Ritalin and supported legal challenges such as the Ritalin class action lawsuits. Both doctors had associations with Scientology in the past but neither belongs to the church.[33][34][35][36][37][38] There is an antipsychiatry movement that often refers to their writings, but in contrast to scientolgists, they are not "anti-psychiatry," but critics of some of its practices.
See also
- Anti-psychiatry
- Biopsychiatry controversy
- Oppositional Defiance Disorder
- The Gene Illusion
- Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
- Ethical problems using children in clinical trials
Notes
- ^ a b Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: legal and ethical aspects - Foreman 91 (2): 192 - Archives of Disease in Childhood
- ^ everychildmatters.gov.uk
- ^ PBS - frontline: medicating kids: backlash: united nations' warnings on ritalin
- ^ http://www.ritalindeath.com/Front-Group.htm
- ^ http://www.add-adhd.org/ritalin_CHADD_A.D.D.html
- ^ http://www.psychminded.co.uk/news/news2006/feb06/Disordered%20thinking.htm Comment by James, Adam, “Disordered thinking?” Psychminded 14 Feb. 2006.
- ^ name="Tim&Rad">Timimi, Sami & Radcliffe, Nick. “The Rise and Rise of ADHD.” Making and Breaking Children's Lives. Ed. Craig Newnes. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books, 2005. 63-70.
- ^ name="Tim&Rad"
- ^ Article for Ethical Human Sciences and Services
- ^ PBS - frontline: medicating kids: adhd: american academy of pediatrics' guidelines
- ^ NIMH · ADHD · The Treatment of ADHD
- ^ PBS - frontline: medicating kids: four families
- ^ Lakhan SE; Hagger-Johnson G. http://www.cpementalhealth.com/content/3/1/21 The impact of prescribed psychotropics on youth. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 2007;3(21).
- ^ CNN.com - Health - Ritalin abuse scoring high on college illegal drug circuit - January 8, 2001
- ^ Researchers Fail to Reveal Full Drug Pay - NYTimes.com
- ^ Researchers Fail to Reveal Full Drug Pay - NYTimes.com
- ^ http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/medicating/adhd/ Medicating Kids
- ^ PBS - frontline: medicating kids: opponents and backlash
- ^ PBS - frontline: medicating kids: interviews: xavier castellanos, m.d
- ^ Baroness Susan Greenfield
- ^ BBC NEWS | Health | Peer calls for ADHD care review
- ^ Boisterous boys are too much like hard work, so we drug them into conformity | Terence Kealey - Times Online
- ^ Parenting as Therapy for Child's Mental Disorders - New York Times
- ^ What’s Wrong With a Child? Psychiatrists Often Disagree - New York Times
- ^ a b c Sappell, Joel (1990-06-29). "Suits, Protests Fuel a Campaign Against Psychiatry". Los Angeles Times. p. A48:1. Retrieved 2006-11-29.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) Backup copy link here - ^ Real-Life Horrors Fuel Growing Outrage Over Deadly ADHD Drugs
- ^ Scientology's war on psychiatry - Salon.com
- ^ http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,595091823,00.html?pg=3
- ^ Talking Back to Ritalin-New Breggin Book Excerpts
- ^ An Anti-Psychiatry Reading List
- ^ Online Dictionary of Mental Health
- ^ TOC - Antipsychiatry Reading Room
- ^ Kurt Cobain - Citizens Commission on Human Rights
- ^ Psychiatric Drugs
- ^ Error
- ^ Why are Scientologists opposed to the use of Ritalin? The President of the Church of Scientology Answers Your Questions
- ^ Ritalin Information: Side Effects, Cautions, Alternatives, ADD, ADHD
- ^ The Child Protection Racket; Freedom Magazine
Further reading
- Armstrong, Thomas "The Myth of the A.D.D. Child. 50 Ways to Improve your Child's Behavior and Attention Span Without Drugs, Labels or Coercion. (1995) New York: Penguin Group.
External links
- ScienceDaily: ADD and ADHD News
- Simon Sobo, MD, "ADHD and Other Sins of Our Children"
- The New England Skeptical Society: Defending ADHD
- http://www.icspp.org International Center for the study of psychiatry and psychology. ADHD Fraud.