Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Honey Club: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Reply |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Delete''' poorly-sourced, reads like an advertisement, and does not appear to pass [[WP:COMPANY]]. -- [[User:JediLofty|JediLofty]] <sup>[[User talk:JediLofty|Talk to me]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/JediLofty|Follow me]]</sub> 16:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' poorly-sourced, reads like an advertisement, and does not appear to pass [[WP:COMPANY]]. -- [[User:JediLofty|JediLofty]] <sup>[[User talk:JediLofty|Talk to me]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/JediLofty|Follow me]]</sub> 16:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
:*The current state of the article does not mean the article topic is non-notable. They're separate issues. --[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
:*The current state of the article does not mean the article topic is non-notable. They're separate issues. --[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
::*I agree. It's the fact that it fails [[WP:COMPANY]] that makes it non-notable! -- [[User:JediLofty|JediLofty]] <sup>[[User talk:JediLofty|Talk to me]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/JediLofty|Follow me]]</sub> 10:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Keep''' - Per the references cited above as it is consistently rated as one of the top clubs in the UK.--[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - Per the references cited above as it is consistently rated as one of the top clubs in the UK.--[[User:Oakshade|Oakshade]] ([[User talk:Oakshade|talk]]) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 10:40, 3 September 2008
- The Honey Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. Google news only turns up one relevant story (about the parent company, no less). Delete. Horselover Frost (talk) 04:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - The criteria for notable is its appearance in DJ Magazine's poll. This criteria is also used in Stereo nightclub, so it appears to have some validity. Also, it does get a fair degree of coverage. This does appear to be a more significant nightclub than the average, and does appear in news sources [1] where it is called a "major seafront nightclub". SilkTork *YES! 11:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - top-20 nightclub according to almost any magazine is notable. Vrefron (talk) 13:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete poorly-sourced, reads like an advertisement, and does not appear to pass WP:COMPANY. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 16:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- The current state of the article does not mean the article topic is non-notable. They're separate issues. --Oakshade (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. It's the fact that it fails WP:COMPANY that makes it non-notable! -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 10:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - Per the references cited above as it is consistently rated as one of the top clubs in the UK.--Oakshade (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC)