Pac-Man defense: Difference between revisions
general clean up |
→Bibliography: added source |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Bibliography == |
== Bibliography == |
||
* ''Big Deal: The Battle for the Control of America's Leading Corporations'', Bruce Wasserstein, ([[1988]], ISBN 0-446-67521-0) |
* ''Big Deal: The Battle for the Control of America's Leading Corporations'', Bruce Wasserstein, ([[1988]], ISBN 0-446-67521-0) |
||
* "Pac-Man Defense" http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pac-man-defense.asp |
|||
==External links== |
==External links== |
Revision as of 01:19, 5 September 2008
The Pac-Man defense is a defensive option to stave off a hostile takeover in which a company that is threatened with a hostile takeover acquires its would-be buyer.
The most quoted example in U.S. corporate history is the attempted hostile takeover of Martin Marietta by Bendix Corporation in 1982. In response, Martin Marietta started buying Bendix stock with the aim of assuming control over the company. Bendix persuaded Allied Corporation to act as a "white knight," and the company was sold to Allied the same year. The incident was labeled a "Pac-Man defense" in retrospect.
The name refers to the star of a video game in which the hero (Pac-Man) is at first chased around by certain enemies of which he has no power over. However, after eating an "Energizer" (also known as a "Power Pill"), he is able to chase and devour these enemies which were previously pursuing him. The term (though not the technique) was coined by buyout guru Bruce Wasserstein.
Bibliography
- Big Deal: The Battle for the Control of America's Leading Corporations, Bruce Wasserstein, (1988, ISBN 0-446-67521-0)
- "Pac-Man Defense" http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/pac-man-defense.asp