User:KYPark/1922: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
: translated (from ''Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung'', 1921) by [[C. K. Ogden]] assisted by [[Frank P. Ramsey]], [[G. E. Moore]] and Wittgenstein himself; titled by [[G. E. Moore]]; prefaced by [[Bertrand Russell]] (all at Cambridge University) |
: translated (from ''Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung'', 1921) by [[C. K. Ogden]] assisted by [[Frank P. Ramsey]], [[G. E. Moore]] and Wittgenstein himself; titled by [[G. E. Moore]]; prefaced by [[Bertrand Russell]] (all at Cambridge University) |
||
* [[Carl Hempel]] believed that Wittgenstein (or at least, the Wittgenstein of the Tractatus) made claims which could only be supported by recourse to metaphysics. To Hempel, [[metaphysics]] were [[anathema]], involving claims to know things which were not knowable, that is, advancing hypotheses incapable of tending to be confirmed or disconfirmed by evidence. |
|||
== References == |
|||
<references /> |
|||
{{navigate 20c}} |
{{navigate 20c}} |
||
Latest revision as of 02:05, 6 September 2008
- Sources from which Eliot quotes or to which he alludes
- Allusions/references to other works
Aside from the obvious footprint of Homer's Odyssey, Joyce deliberately allowed himself to be influenced by literally hundreds of other writers and their works during the composition of Ulysses.
- The Foundations of Aesthetics
- George Allen and Unwin, London
- co-authored with Ivor Richards and James Edward Hathorn Wood
- Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- translated (from Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung, 1921) by C. K. Ogden assisted by Frank P. Ramsey, G. E. Moore and Wittgenstein himself; titled by G. E. Moore; prefaced by Bertrand Russell (all at Cambridge University)
- Carl Hempel believed that Wittgenstein (or at least, the Wittgenstein of the Tractatus) made claims which could only be supported by recourse to metaphysics. To Hempel, metaphysics were anathema, involving claims to know things which were not knowable, that is, advancing hypotheses incapable of tending to be confirmed or disconfirmed by evidence.
References
[edit]| Navigate 1900's | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| '00 | '01 | '02 | '03 | '04 | '05 | '06 | '07 | '08 | '09 |
| '10 | '11 | '12 | '13 | '14 | '15 | '16 | '17 | '18 | '19 |
| '20 | '21 | '22 | '23 | '24 | '25 | '26 | '27 | '28 | '29 |
| '30 | '31 | '32 | '33 | '34 | '35 | '36 | '37 | '38 | '39 |
| '40 | '41 | '42 | '43 | '44 | '45 | '46 | '47 | '48 | '49 |
| '50 | '51 | '52 | '53 | '54 | '55 | '56 | '57 | '58 | '59 |
| '60 | '61 | '62 | '63 | '64 | '65 | '66 | '67 | '68 | '69 |
| '70 | '71 | '72 | '73 | '74 | '75 | '76 | '77 | '78 | '79 |
| '80 | '81 | '82 | '83 | '84 | '85 | '86 | '87 | '88 | '89 |
| '90 | '91 | '92 | '93 | '94 | '95 | '96 | '97 | '98 | '99 |
| Navigate 2000's | |||||||||
| '00 | '01 | '02 | '03 | '04 | '05 | '06 | '07 | '08 | '09 |
| '10 | '11 | '12 | '13 | '14 | '15 | '16 | '17 | '18 | '19 |