Wikipedia:Peer review/Guitar Hero/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
← Created page with '{{subst:PR/subst}} {{Peer review page|topic=everydaylife}} This article is presently a GA, and I am looking to improve it to an FA. There are likely things with c...' |
Linking to semi-automated peer review (bot task 2) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:{{PR/header|Guitar Hero| Wikipedia:Peer review/Guitar Hero/archive1|September 2008}}<!-- |
:{{PR/header|Guitar Hero| Wikipedia:Peer review/Guitar Hero/archive1|September 2008}}<!-- |
||
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
||
--> |
|||
--><!--semi-automated peer review placeholder -- please do not edit or delete this comment--> |
|||
* A script has been used to generate a semi-[[User:AndyZ/peerreviewer|automated]] review of the article for issues relating to grammar and [[WP:MOS|house]] style; it can be found on the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/September 2008#Guitar Hero|automated peer review page]] for September 2008. [[Category:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews]] |
|||
{{Peer review page|topic=everydaylife}} |
{{Peer review page|topic=everydaylife}} |
||
This article is presently a GA, and I am looking to improve it to an FA. There are likely things with copyediting, references, and the like that are askew for FA, but I'm looking for input more on the overall and section organization particularly with regards to "History" and "Cultural Impact". |
This article is presently a GA, and I am looking to improve it to an FA. There are likely things with copyediting, references, and the like that are askew for FA, but I'm looking for input more on the overall and section organization particularly with regards to "History" and "Cultural Impact". |
||
Revision as of 10:09, 8 September 2008
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.
This article is presently a GA, and I am looking to improve it to an FA. There are likely things with copyediting, references, and the like that are askew for FA, but I'm looking for input more on the overall and section organization particularly with regards to "History" and "Cultural Impact".
Thanks, MASEM 00:58, 8 September 2008 (UTC)