Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2005 September 17: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:13, 21 September 2005

September 17

Image:AMPH zoobileezoo.jpg, contrary to the uploader's claim, this is not a screenshot; the image was lifted from Hallmark's official Zoobilee Zoo site — Ringbang 20:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Regardless of the image's origin (it is indeed from the Hallmark site), I believe the photograph is actually a still from the TV show's opening sequence. Isn't that a screenshot by definition? --Krishva 05:07, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Morraine lake.jpg → Commons RedWolf 01:19, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kelvinside academy os map2.jpg - Copyright notice clearly states "Copyright Crown 2005" It is not a proper copyright in any event. --Noitall 05:28, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyvio. If Noitall had actually read the image description he would see why. See also Wikipedia:Maps from Ordnance Survey. We are well within the ten images limit. What does it is not a proper copyright in any event mean? --

RHaworth 08:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am also curious about the claim it is not a proper copyright in any event because the U.S. (where the servers are) is a member of the Berne Convention and copyright notices are optional both in the U.K. and here.

Agree - not a copyvio. OS website clearly states permission for 10 images. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not making a comment on this specific image, but with permission isn't sufficent for our project. Unless you can make a good fair use claim, the image must be free in the free software sense of free. --Gmaxwell 21:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I am the uploader of this image. I am happy to comply with policy, once we clarify what it is. See also Wikipedia:Maps from Ordnance Survey. Bovlb 18:01, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I note that Wikipedia:Image copyright tags now lists Template:Ordnance Survey Copyright as "Do not upload images for which one of the tags in this section applies." There are several other maps with this tag (or in Category:Maps from Ordnance Survey) that are consequently affected. Bovlb 15:26, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:M Streep Silkwood.jpg OR, NS, obsoleted by Image:Streep Silkwood.jpg --Bash 02:03, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:M25.jpeg BI (and NS, though that's a bit redundant; I'm having trouble just submitting the IFD tag to the picture). --Bash 02:20, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MF132.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:27, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MFCroCop.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:37, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ma Ying-Jeou.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MVaughan.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ma12.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 02:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Mac mini.jpg OR, NS, obsoleted by Image:MacminiAPPLE.jpg --Bash 02:54, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:TheAge-frontpage.jpg OB by Image:TheAge-frontpage.png Swarve 03:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Channelninelogo.JPG OB by Image:Channelnine.png Swarve 03:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Ramdiesel.jpg OR --Smiker 10:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Class Action 020 (cropped for Garageband.com).jpg UE, page is a candidate for deletion. Mikecap 03:24, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MadonnaEvita02.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Madonna.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Madonna2012.jpg OR, NS. --Bash 04:09, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Another big batch of OR (and mostly NS) "Conversion script" images. Coffee 05:38, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:SunsetBoulevardWilliamHolden.jpg - Clearly copyrighted from a well-maintained copyright by the studio. Not a proper fair use or GDFL license. --Noitall 06:22, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Disagree. I contributed the image and its use is in line with Wikipedia:Fair use and is correctly tagged and justified as per Wikipedia:Image description page. If this image is deleted then rightly all screenshot images should be deleted for the same reason. Of course the copyright is owned by someone - I've made that clear on the image description page. Fair use is acceptable in some cases and this case, I believe, is one of them. Why did the person nominating this for deletion ignore two other screenshot images in the same article? This image was part of the article during the time it went through featured article consideration, and the images were discussed at the time, with consensus being that their use was in fact, fair. What's not fair is this nomination for deletion. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Meets the requirements under Wikipedia:Fair use. --Carnildo 04:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:BluceD.jpg - Clearly copyrighted. Not a proper fair use. --Noitall 06:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As per my comments above - this is also used in a featured article (Iron Maiden), and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Iron Maiden Steve Harris.jpg - Clearly copyrighted. Not a proper fair use. --Noitall 06:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promo photo - fair use. --PopUpPirate 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As per my comments above - this is also used in a featured article (Iron Maiden), and the image was discussed during the nomination process and consensus was reached that its use was fair. Rossrs 11:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:04 Schlüter Ecke Mom.JPG OR, NS --Nv8200p (talk) 14:14, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:04sco31.jpg OR, NS --Nv8200p (talk) 14:26, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:05013601.jpg OR, NS --Nv8200p (talk) 14:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:0503kursaal01.jpg OR, NS --Nv8200p (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Shauna 18.jpg -- too high res for fair use, not tagged.
Image:Boodlicious.jpg -- ditto. --Zantastik talk 15:29, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
OR, NS images by User:Animusicboy --Nv8200p (talk) 15:36, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Image:AN8.jpg.jpg
- Image:Pictures at an Exhibition.bmp.jpg
- Image:Fiber Bundles.bmp.jpg
- Image:Kirbybeam art.jpg
- Image:051303 airride kirbysword.jpg
- Image:Kss kirbycutter.gif
Image:05-30 Cappadocia IMG 1726 web.JPG NS image removed from article Turan, which has a dozen other images --Nv8200p (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:054.jpg OR, NS, UE --Nv8200p (talk) 16:13, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Smirnoff2.jpg this "grafiti" image was uploaded and added to the Allspark article by Spotti (talk • contribs), looks like he has a grudge against a web forum mentioned in the article or something. Anyway I can't think of any worthwile ensyclopedic use for this image, wich is why I've listed it here after I removed it from the article. --Sherool 16:52, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:05 aussie first 9.jpg OR, NS --Nv8200p (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Alstom logo.gif OR, OB by Image:Alstom logo.png Mark83 19:40, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:ABBA-Greatest Hits Vol. 2.jpg OR, OB by Image:ABBA Greatest Hits Vol 2.jpg. JYolkowski // talk 20:35, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Courtney.jpg - OR, CV. The uploader has tagged each and every one of his images with {{PD}}, when almost all of them are from copyrighted websites. Extraordinary Machine 20:46, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Body Piercing Jewelry.pdf - Claims to be GFDL, but User:Rafti Institute says otherwise, assuming it's the same thing. Anyway PDFs are annoying, and presumably we have articles on everything covered in it. --SPUI (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. User:Rafti Institute has been spamming Wikipedia with images and content that is of dubious origin for some time. Cleaning up his contributions here has been quite the pain in the ass. Glowimperial 21:47, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Cisco.gif OR, OB by Image:Cisco Systems logo.png Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:50, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Murray Webb Caricature Jonah Lomu in Counties Kit.jpg claims to be NZ Crown Copyright but going to the source page it says "Copyright must be cleared before this is reproduced for publication.". Also orphan. Evil Monkey∴Hello 22:23, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Acwildworlddscoverfrombestbuy.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Googlex pheterson.gif OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Graffiti1.png OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:GreatLakesLayoutProblem.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It's technically not an orphan, since it's linked (not inlined) from Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Great Lakes Storm of 1913. That said, I don't much care if it's deleted or not. --Carnildo 04:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Guidinglight1983.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I was unaware someone had removed it. It's going back on Guiding Light, making the orphan listing moot. Mike H (Talking is hot) 05:17, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Crime Robbery.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Crowd1.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:DFS.jpg OR. Thunderbrand 23:42, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Emily Browning the Gardener.jpg UE, OR, looks like a vandalised image too. *drew 02:40, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Deathwatch movie.png OR, OB. *drew 03:25, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Image:2005_vote_and_seats.JPG OR --Gmaxwell 04:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 ::'''Not''' a copyvio. If Noitall had actually read the image description he would see why. See also [[Wikipedia:Maps from Ordnance Survey]]. We are well within the ten images limit. What does ''it is not a proper copyright in any event'' mean? --
 [[User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] 08:58, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
+::'''Comment''': I am also curious about the claim ''it is not a proper copyright in any event'' because the U.S. (where the servers are) is a member of the [[Berne Convention]] and copyright notices are optional both in the U.K. and here.
 ::Agree - not a copyvio.  OS website clearly states permission for 10 images. --[[User:PopUpPirate|PopUpPirate]] 10:48, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
 :::Not making a comment on this specific image, but '''with permission''' isn't sufficent for our project. Unless you can make a good fair use claim, the image must be free in the free software sense of free. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] 21:10, 17 September 2005 (UTC)