User talk:Steve Farrell

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) 16:28, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Billy Boys

I would ask you to reconsider your vote for deletion as this article has been expanded. PatGallacher 17:56, 2005 July 16 (UTC)

Mythology

I just stumbled across a remarkably good piece on the interrelationship between Mesopotamian myth and Gensis in the artilce Adam and Eve - see the section called Mythologies or some such. PiCo 12:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Alchemy POV

Well, Alchemy is obviously POV, very POV..... but I removed that same sentence before and Jorge Stolfi had an absolute shitfit..... be prepared for a fight, and let me know if you need help.

The guy can shitfit all he wants, that sentence shouldn't be there. Besides being POV, it's also wrong. --Stevefarrell 17:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

But, I should mention that if you can properly cite things he can't really stop you from fixing the POV problem.

KV 20:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Or, alternatively, he can't really stop me from removing the POV sentence because POV sentences are against Wikipedia policy. I don't need to cite anything, it basically said 'Alchemy is obviously stupid, and should be pointed and laughed at'. Though if I have to, I will. --Stevefarrell 21:08, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Userbox Public Transit

According to Wikipedia:The German solution, here’s a a tip for you: {{User:Olve/Userboxes/Public transport}} (in lieu of the blanked template:User Public Transit). -- Olve 22:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Steve mcclaren.jpg

This file may be BALEETED!.

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve mcclaren.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\^talk 22:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Added source info. Copyright paranoia is such fun.--Stevefarrell 23:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry!

I wasn't aware I had! Superlinus 06:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

No worries. It wasn't exactly hard to add myself back. I'm sure it was just a mistake. Hope to see you in the edit history of some football articles! --Stevefarrell 10:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		I present to you your first barnstar for your hard work on the Your Sinclair article! — Wackymacs 13:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Hurrah! --Stevefarrell 13:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Glory hunters

Other Wikipedia articles are not necessarily reliable sources for information (see the organisation's own disclaimer) and in any case Chelsea are mentioned in one add-on sentence. There is also no mention of glory hunters in the Arsenal, Liverpool or Manchester United articles, who are all cited on the glory hunter page. Assertions like "rival supporters have accused..." (which sounds weasly to me), and "who have converted to supporting the club due to its success, rather than because of any real passion for the team itself, and who would stop supporting the team if it stopped being so succesful" are very bold statements and need sources. Given that you added them, surely you ought to provide it. Thirdly, I'm not sure the inclusion of fans' opinions of other sets of fans is a good idea generally, given the sort of mud that is routinely thrown among football fans. As a Liverpool fan, I'm you'd agree that rival fans have accused them of plenty over the years. It doesn't mean those accusations belong here, though. SteveO 18:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough. I noted from your user page that you were a Chelsea fan, and so I'm sure you get tagged as a 'glory hunter' all the time by people, even though you probably supported them while they were in division two. Most football fans are glory hunters in one sense or another - even Watford fans want to see their team win the Premiership and are probably angry that they're right at the bottom.

I actually looked for some impartial sources about this, but then I decided it wasn't all that important after all. --Stevefarrell 19:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Steve mcclaren.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Steve mcclaren.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 17:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

The image does not fail fair use rationale. It is used in one article, the article about Steve McClaren, to illustrate the subject. It is properly sourced, with a link to the source. There is no need to replace it. --Stevefarrell 18:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Jim Reardon Saturdays of Thunder Michael Polcino John Frink Mike B. Anderson Droylsden F.C. Josh Weinstein Steven Dean Moore Wanda Koolmatrie Mike Reiss List of awards won by The Simpsons Joel H. Cohen Mark Kirkland Dog of Death Cyberworld When Flanders Failed Virtual Springfield Besian Idrizaj David Mirkin

Cleanup Lost Our Lisa Treehouse of Horror XVI Abraham Simpson Merge Millennium Stadium Assignat Viking funeral Add Sources Homer Laughlin Rainier Wolfcastle Martin Prince Wikify Moe's Tavern Meralco Homer Jones (football player) Expand Shi Hengxia Ian Rush A1 (band)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Username change

As you requested, your username has now been changed from Stevefarrell to Steve Farrell. If you haven't done it already, please remember to move your user page and your talk page using the "move" tab on the upper right-hand side of your screen. Redux 13:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

SFX

It seems improper to include her former name in there - they no longer do in the magazine itself, and it is irrelevant to the magazine article what her name was. If she was notable enough to have an article about herself, it would be included, but why for the magazine? You go to the article for info about the magazine, and you get information about someone's former name - it's a bit odd! It's also kind of personal to her, so including biographical information about a living person in the article feels wrong. Stephenb (Talk) 16:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

... on my User page. I was off reporting the abUser to AIV. Regards, Flyguy649 20:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Steve Farrell! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 02:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

I fixed the approval bug from last night. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 15:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you are interested in football this is an invitation to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 19:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Multi-instrumentalists' official listing!

Well, this might be a little too little, but I however want to congratulate your recent edit on multi-instrumentalists page. Happens that some of the fellows you've removed from the list were added by me, but I was somehow happy to find them deleted. I came to think of it and they really were pretty weak as multi-instrumentalists (although being able to play both the violin and guitar at the same time stays a mystery to me!) and, on the other hand, as I checked the latest two versions of the article in comparison, I watched your choices, which seemed pretty fair to me. That's why I let this message here - it's maybe I've seen one of the most convincing edits since I entered the community. And that wasn't today nor yesterday - I've been in it for quite a while. Cheers! (Impy4ever 20:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC))

Thank you. It's nice to get some thanks for doing this kind of edit for a change. I hesitated over the one that said 'violin/guitar/vocals', though. I generally think that a musician can be considered a 'multi-instrumentalist' if he or she plays more than three or four distinct instruments, not including vocals (I consider bass guitar and electric guitar separate as there are different techniques involved in playing them). But my criteria may be different from others. The list of multi-instrumentalists often has a lot of weak additions made to it, as do other similar articles such as Keyboardist, which I also watch and quite often find myself reverting edits to. It's understandable that people want to see their favourite artists' names on as many pages as possible. Really, that's why I started editing the Multi-instrumentalist article in the first place, as I'm a fan of Mike Oldfield, and I know him as a multi-instrumentalist and thought he should be at least mentioned in the article. But after I started a 'list of' within that article, many unnecessary people were being added (someone, for example, kept insisting on adding Michael Jackson), so eventually someone came along and took the list off, and I created the List of multi-instrumentalists article. Thanks for the praise. --Steve Farrell 21:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Rudess

You don't consider Jordan Rudess a notable keyboardist? --ΛэтєяиuS 16:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sfxcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sfxcover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:11, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ZXPrinceOfPersia.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:ZXPrinceOfPersia.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Please see

I have left a note on the multi-instrumentalist page, explaining my thoughts on the choices that you appear to have made. Please, take a look. Thank you. --leahtwosaints (talk) 13:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dreamstonelogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Dreamstonelogo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

The image is clearly the logo/ident for the early 1990s British cartoon The Dreamstone. I will go and change it, or wait a while and have another page that doesn't have anything to illustrate it because of copyright paranoia. --Steve Farrell (talk) 03:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)