User talk:Bungle

Reply

It's already on AN/I, so I'll raise it there. Orderinchaos 19:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. In the meantime, also attempted to address it at the page itself and at Wingard's talk page. I will be going to bed shortly (I'm based in Western Australia) so if you need any further assistance just raise it at AN/I. Orderinchaos 19:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Emmerdale episodes

Template:Emmerdale episodes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Emmerdale template

Last question: Why can't you Btitish people use The American Way of writing the dates? And FYI it's not only in America they write like that, we do write like that here in Sweden too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingard (talk • contribs)

Windows Vista unofficial requirements

Microsoft's official hardware requirements are a laugh matter. This is why I included 2 professional opinions about recommended specs, which actually go in line with general public opinion on the matter. Anybody who tested this OS, even on a modern PC like mine, would agree. Now, is it possible to include an unofficial recommendation without it being somebody's opinion? I think not. VShaka (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

charity Dingle

Hey Bungle, do you know if it's true that this character is set to return to Emmerdale this year? It says so in the article, but it's unsourced and I couldnt find a source online. I wanted to check it's not a lie.Gungadin 18:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Merging Jimmy Dockerson

Go to talk:List of recurring and minor Coronation Street characters to see talk concerning merging Jimmy Dockerson to that article;you have previously left me a message, so why not get sort it out. Dodgechris (talk) (UTC)

P50

Hey - why the vandalism threat? looks like we tried to undo the same edit at the same time and WP got confused. Don't jump to such rash conclusions.

I have no problem with your edit, but accusing vandalism, when if you look at the page history all that happened is we tried to undo the same edit at the same time is a bit OTT. Never assume.

Ymmit (talk) 21:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Raising of school leaving age in England and Wales‎

Thanks for spotting and fixing my error! -- SiobhanHansa 12:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Westlife!

No worries about the changes! Just trying to get a quality article... with many of the teens who edit it, they let their enthusiasm over-run whatever good writing we have in there! So thanks for being vigilant with links and such! Kaihoku (talk) 07:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Dodgechris/Notdoppler

I've just opened a sockpuppetry case re:Dodgechris/Notdoppler here - if there's anything obvious you think I've missed, or anything you want to add, I'd appreciate your comments :) Frickative 23:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I've made a comment similar to that which I posted on your talk page, and i'll be sure to keep on eye on the progress! Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

School leaving age

Thanks for your message. I'm sorry if you think my edits weren't helpful. My main concern was that an article on History of Education England was a major gap. I built it up with material from the Raising of the School Leaving age article and others. Obviously this is just the start of a major enterprise in getting the article to a good standard. I'm sure you'll agree that it is good to have a proper series of articles so that the RoSLA article can be a subarticle of Hist of Ed or something else appropriate. Laziness does not really come into it, as I don't and can't claim any ownership over any of the articles in the series. The only concern is the quality of the encyclopedia. I'll be interested to read your further comments, and although I don't know how much time I can devote to editing in the coming month, I'll try to devote some effort to restoring the balance so that Hist of Ed is a general overview and RoSLA carries the detail on that particular subject. Regards. Itsmejudith (talk) 20:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Peer review

You are very welcome - glad it was helpful. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

It's Dodgechris

Hi, Bungle, me, the real life person of User:Dodgechris has just created an account, this is him (see on the signiature for name), i'm just saying i'm sorry, you were persuing the Dodgechris incident, weren't you? I'm just like to say sorry to you, and please can you forgive me and please don't block this account, all i want is to edit constructively, i love wiki, but if you chose to block me, i'll be sad, but i won't use socks, i'll stay away, maybe i'll just add 1 unblock template, but that's all, if you let me keep this account, i'll edit constructively, and never, ever vandalise, i'll also be civil, avoid spamming and stick with the rules, and i'll say sorry properly to the others i harrassed , can you please send them my apologies. Gabazauls 20:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Reply

Look Bungle, i've never "hated" you, nor do i hate Frickative or any of the others, i just want to be accepted into Wikipedia and get along with you guys, im truly sorry for what i've done to you and if i'm not accepted for the time being, how long do you think i'll have to wait before trying again, and how should i approach it?