User talk:Niusereset: Difference between revisions
Niusereset (talk | contribs) |
→Kemetist > Kemetic: new section |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:Thanks for welcome :-)<br>--[[User:Niusereset|Niusereset]] 27.VIII. MMVIII, 11:25 [[CEST]] |
:Thanks for welcome :-)<br>--[[User:Niusereset|Niusereset]] 27.VIII. MMVIII, 11:25 [[CEST]] |
||
== Kemetist > Kemetic == |
|||
Hi! I inform you that "[[Kemetist]]" is not widely used in English; the right word is "[[Kemetic]]/[[Kemetics]]". --[[User:Iho|Iho]] ([[User talk:Iho|talk]]) 16:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:39, 20 September 2008
{{Neopaganism-stub}}
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 04:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Trust me, I was looking and searching stubs but I did not find what I was looking for. So I had two posibilities: to create stub for Kemetism or create some general neopaganistic stub. I choose the second one. And believe me I would rather use existed stub than cerating a new-one. But there was not what I needed. The closest was paganism stub, but paganism is not the same as neopaganism (eachone has here individual articles and whole individual cathegories).
If that stub will be considered as a mistake I will accept verdict. But at that moment I did what I considered as the best.
--Niusereset 25.VIII. MMVIII, 12:00 CEST
Howdy
I wanted to offer my hand and welcome you here (even though you've been here a while), and specifically to thank-you for your help on one of my pet projects here, all things dealing with Kemetic religions. I look forward to working with you further in the future! If you ever have any questions or concerns about something I said or did, please do not feel hesitant to let me know or ask me a question. - IanCheesman (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for welcome :-)
--Niusereset 27.VIII. MMVIII, 11:25 CEST
Kemetist > Kemetic
Hi! I inform you that "Kemetist" is not widely used in English; the right word is "Kemetic/Kemetics". --Iho (talk) 16:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)