Jump to content

Ian Stewart (mathematician): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SmackBot (talk | contribs)
m Date the maintenance tags and general fixes
Bibliography of his publications: Italics for magazine titles
Line 45: Line 45:


==Bibliography of his publications==
==Bibliography of his publications==
Stewart has published in journals that have included [[Scientific American]], [[New Scientist]], and [[Nature (journal)|Nature]].
Stewart has published in journals that have included ''[[Scientific American]]'', ''[[New Scientist]]'', and ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]''.


*''[[Another Fine Math You've Got Me Into]]''
*''[[Another Fine Math You've Got Me Into]]''

Revision as of 15:49, 21 September 2008

Ian Stewart
Born1945, aged 62
England
Alma materChurchill College, Cambridge
University of Warwick
Scientific career
FieldsMathematics
Doctoral advisorBrian Hartley

Ian Nicholas Stewart (born 1945) is a professor of mathematics at University of Warwick, England, and a widely known popular-science and science-fiction writer.

Biography

Stewart was born in 1945 in England. While in the sixth form at school, Stewart came to the attention of the mathematics teacher. The teacher had Stewart sit mock A-level examinations without any preparation along with the upper-sixth students; Stewart placed first in the examination. This teacher arranged for Stewart to be admitted to Cambridge on a scholarship to Churchill College, where he obtained a BA in Mathematics. Stewart then went to the University of Warwick for his PhD, on completion of which in 1969 he was offered an academic position. He is now Professor of Mathematics at the University of Warwick. He is one of the world's most famous mathematicians, with significant contributions to catastrophe theory.

Stewart has held visiting academic positions in Germany (1974), New Zealand (1976), and the U.S. (University of Connecticut 1977–78, University of Houston 1983–84).

In 1995 Stewart received the Michael Faraday Medal and in 1997 he gave the Royal Institution Christmas Lectures. He was elected to the Royal Society in 2001.

He has collaborated with Dr Jack Cohen and Terry Pratchett on three popular science books based on Pratchett's Discworld. In 1999 Terry Pratchett made both Jack Cohen and Professor Ian Stewart "Honorary Wizards of the Unseen University" at the same ceremony at which the University of Warwick gave Terry Pratchett an honorary degree.

Stewart has published more than 140 scientific papers, including a series of influential papers co-authored with Jim Collins on coupled oscillators and the symmetry of animal gaits.

Stewart was married to his wife, Avril, in 1970. They met at a party at a house Avril was renting while she trained as a nurse. They have two sons. [citation needed]

Bibliography of his publications

Stewart has published in journals that have included Scientific American, New Scientist, and Nature.

Select quotations

  • From What Does a Martian Look Like? The Science of Extraterrestrial Life:
"[S]cience is the best defense against believing what we want to."
"Lawyers have a concept known as 'fungibility'. Things are fungible if substituting one for another has no legal implications. For example, cans of baked beans with the same manufacturer and the same nominal weight are fungible: you have no legal complaint if the shop substitutes a different can when the assistant notices that the one you've just bought is dented. The fact that the new can contains 1,346 beans, whereas the old one contained 1,347, is legally irrelevant.
That's what `take as given' means, too. Explanations that climb the reductionist hierarchy are cascades of fungibilities. Such explanations are comprehensible, and thus convincing, only because each stage in the story relies only upon particular simple features of the previous stage. The complicated details a level or two down do not need to be carried upwards indefinitely. Such features are intellectual resting-points in the chain of logic. Examples include the observation that atoms can be assembled into many complex structures, making molecules possible, and the complicated but elegant geometry of the DNA double helix that permits the `encoding' of complex `instructions' for making organisms. The story can then continue with the computational abilities of DNA coding, onward and upward to goats, without getting enmeshed in the quantum wave functions of amino acids.
What we tend to forget, when told a story with this structure, is that it could have had many different beginnings. Anything that lets us start from the molecular level would have done just as well. A totally different subatomic theory would be an equally valid starting-point for the story, provided it led to the same general feature of a replicable molecule. Subatomic particle theory is fungible when viewed from the level of goats. It has to be, or else we would never be able to keep a goat without first doing a Ph.D. in subatomic physics."