Talk:Hardware security module: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:34, 23 September 2008

I think perhaps the Hardware Acceleration section is dated at this point. In some cases a modern host processor is now faster than the embedded system chip in the HSM. For instance, nCipher no longer makes claims of acceleration on much of its hardware line (a new-ish laptop can keep up with their '4000' systems in digest calculation, for instance)

Jdmarshall (talk) 20:34, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are "Hardware Security Module" and "secure cryptoprocessor" two names for the same thing, and so should be merged? --68.0.124.33 (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was suggesting exact same thing in secure cryptoprocessor discussion. KnowS (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes by 201.82.33.70

Comparison table is outright vandalism/advertising. Other changes are of questionable quality. Who agrees with me that we need to reorganize table and perhaps revisit other edits?

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 --[[Special:Contributions/68.0.124.33|68.0.124.33]] ([[User talk:68.0.124.33|talk]]) 22:59, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 : I was suggesting exact same thing in [[secure cryptoprocessor]] discussion. [[User:KSinitski|KnowS]] ([[User talk:KSinitski|talk]]) 16:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
+== Changes by 201.82.33.70 ==
+Comparison table is outright vandalism/advertising. Other changes are of questionable quality. Who agrees with me that we need to reorganize table and perhaps revisit other edits?