Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Circus: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jasynnash2 (talk | contribs) →Blood Circus: re - more |
Jasynnash2 (talk | contribs) →Blood Circus: may actually be from reliable site but, it is pay-per-view so currently doubtful of "significant"... |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* '''Keep''' Lack of credible citations does not mean that there are no third party sources for this; it simply hasn't been properly cited. I know of at least one newspaper article in the [[Washington Post]] about the movie: (Harrington, Richard "The Fans Cry for 'Blood'!" <u>Washington Post</u> 11 Feb.1985, final ed.). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Feddx|Feddx]] ([[User talk:Feddx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Feddx|contribs]]) 15:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
* '''Keep''' Lack of credible citations does not mean that there are no third party sources for this; it simply hasn't been properly cited. I know of at least one newspaper article in the [[Washington Post]] about the movie: (Harrington, Richard "The Fans Cry for 'Blood'!" <u>Washington Post</u> 11 Feb.1985, final ed.). <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Feddx|Feddx]] ([[User talk:Feddx|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Feddx|contribs]]) 15:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:You should know this isn't just about what is or isn't in the article but, what is or isn't actually out there. In all honesty I found some stuff through google but, none of it could remotely be considered significant. |
:You should know this isn't just about what is or isn't in the article but, what is or isn't actually out there. In all honesty I found some stuff through google but, none of it could remotely be considered significant. [[User:Jasynnash2|Jasynnash2]] ([[User talk:Jasynnash2|talk]]) 15:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 15:50, 25 September 2008
- Blood Circus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
no significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sources for the subject of this article under either name means it fails our verifiability policy. It may also not be notable enough for inclusion under our notability guidlines. After this article is deleted we should straighten out the redirects so they go to the musical acts as the more appropriately notable and verifiable entities Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
NeutralI got a talk page message about this article that I was the editor with the most-non vandal edits. Actually most of those edits were for removing attack edits against the popular indie rock musician Santogold who the subject (Santo V. Rigatuso) is suing for stealing his name. I made my point in a similar AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SANTO GOLD), where you can view my reasons for deleting that article. This one, i'm not to sure of. There's several COI edits and attempts to own the page by Rigatuso or someone connected to him. But I really don't think that's reason enough to delete the page on the film. I'd like a few more third party sources before I can make that call. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 12:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- For transparency it was I who left the message on the above user's talkpage figuring it was as close as I'd be able to get to notifying the author or significant contributor. If it is better I notify a different user than let me know and I'll go ahead and do that. Thanks. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:38, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I understand why you'd do that. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 14:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Current indications are that this article cannot be adequately sourced. H.G. 13:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Lack of credible citations does not mean that there are no third party sources for this; it simply hasn't been properly cited. I know of at least one newspaper article in the Washington Post about the movie: (Harrington, Richard "The Fans Cry for 'Blood'!" Washington Post 11 Feb.1985, final ed.). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Feddx (talk • contribs) 15:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- You should know this isn't just about what is or isn't in the article but, what is or isn't actually out there. In all honesty I found some stuff through google but, none of it could remotely be considered significant. Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)