User talk:Eiland

Category:Articles which may be biased

Back in 2006 you've [1] added a line to the Wikipedia:POV check page, referring to the Category:Articles which may be biased. However, this page doesnt work or exist (anymore). Can you fix it or remove it? -- Eiland 10:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

This is Wikipedia, where anyone can edit. If it needs to be fixed, you can always fix it yourself. -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 18:10, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The article has been fixed, and so now isgoing to the next stage: Speedy deletion.Harrypotter 23:10, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Robin Wood (environmental organisation)

A tag has been placed on Robin Wood (environmental organisation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 17:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

STOP

You have mangled the List of civilian nuclear accidents article and perpetrated a edit war over the contents.

This was noticed on the administrators' incidents noticeboard.

Please stop editing the article for the time being (talk page is ok and strongly encouraged to work out the dispute peacefully). I and others are going to have to clean it up. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Leonid Savin

I am somewhat puzzled as to why you think Mr Savin is not notable. The fact that some people involved in friends of the earth maybe embarrassed by the way he infiltrated them, just as he also infiltrated Peoples Global Action is not sufficient reason. Clearly he is notable as regards the Hoverla action, and that should be plain to anyone, even if they do not see his previous manouvres of no significance. I am also puzzled why you consider straight talking about the New Right malevolent?Harrypotter (talk) 00:04, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

See the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Savin (2nd nomination) thread. -- Eiland (talk) 12:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Your Edits to Core damage frequency

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Core damage frequency. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dusti^SPEAK!! 23:21, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Mediation request for core damage frequency

Your fellow editors have invited you to join in a mediation discussion about this article. Please come join us at the table linked through the template at the top of the article's talk page. HatlessAtless (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Foratom

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foratom, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nuclearspin.org/index.php/European_Atomic_Forum. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

It falls under the GNU_Free_Documentation_License --Eiland (talk) 11:43, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Superscript in powers

Note that Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Conventions says: Avoid the unicode characters ² and ³. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

See Wikipedia_talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers)#Superscripts, where I added Note that in the Wiki markup hints at the bottom of each edit page theres javascript to achieve m² and m³. -- Eiland (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Eiland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 13:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

GreenFacts

Hi, Eiland. Could you kindly contact me at you best convenience, concerning the changes you made recently to the GreenFacts page. Indeed, some of them are incorrect, but as the former General Manager and still Vice-president of the organization, I would not like to revert them to avoid any potential conflict of interest. My contact detail are in my user page. Thanks, --Jacques de Selliers (talk) 20:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

I have added the "Criticism" talk section in the GreenFacts article concerning your modifications. Could you kindly reply? Thanks, --Jacques de Selliers (talk) 11:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Energy security

I'm very disappointed at the cherry-picking of the countries you listed as sources of uranium in Energy security [2], leaving out the largest producers (Canada and Australia). The actual list after all is in the short second paragraph of the Intro of Uranium mining (which you made a wikilink to [3]), virtually impossible to miss. Simesa (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, I wasnt the one who said it were "stable" countries. I didnt read the entire mining article, just linked it. My action seems to have gotten it fixed :) -- Special:Contributions/Eiland (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)