Jump to content

User talk:Rivarez: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
24ip (talk | contribs)
Rivarez (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
You have been blocked for 24 hours for a [[WP:3RR|3RR]] violation on [[Sealand]] as per [[WP:AN3|the reporting page]]. '''[[User:Sasquatch|<font color=#89CF19>Sasquatch</font>]]'''<span style="background-color:#C1FF5F">[[User_talk:Sasquatch|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|c]]</span> 22:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for a [[WP:3RR|3RR]] violation on [[Sealand]] as per [[WP:AN3|the reporting page]]. '''[[User:Sasquatch|<font color=#89CF19>Sasquatch</font>]]'''<span style="background-color:#C1FF5F">[[User_talk:Sasquatch|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Sasquatch|c]]</span> 22:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)


==Sealand==
Please refrain from unilaterally reverting this article (and using misleading edit summaries) while a continuing discussion is underway concerning the wider issue of micronation infoboxes. You can contribute to the discussion if you wish on the appropriate page. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 23:34, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

:I am going to ask you one more time to stop making unilateral reversions of the Sealand infobox, accompanied by misleading edit summaries. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 00:59, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

==Hello [[User:Wik|Wik]], aka [[User:Gzornenplatz|Gzornenplatz]], aka [[User:Nopuzzlestranger|Nopuzzlestranger]] ==

Your slip is showing. Let's see how long it takes for you to be hard-banned banned ''this'' time. I'm betting a week at your current rate. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 01:32, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
:Clearly you do not appreciate the 3RR. Some discussion at [[Talk:Sealand]] would be nice, by the way. [[User:24ip|24ip]] | [[User talk:24ip|lolol]] 01:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
:Clearly you do not appreciate the 3RR. Some discussion at [[Talk:Sealand]] would be nice, by the way. [[User:24ip|24ip]] | [[User talk:24ip|lolol]] 01:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
::I appreciate it, so long as it is equally applied. But O^O was not blocked for his violation, so it seems to be a dead letter. Admins think they don't have to enforce the rule "if they don't feel like it". [[User:Rivarez|Rivarez]] 02:24, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 29 September 2005

Hi! Thanks for everything you've done on the "Left Party" page. One question: why did you remove the reference to the KPD in the list of predecessor parties? My intention in adding it was not to be POV: but legally, the Left Party is a successor of the KPD as it was reestablished in the Soviet Occupation Zone of Germany in 1945 and later merged with the east-SPD to form the SED. So there's legal continuity there, and even the post-communist members of the party claim at least a sentimental connection with the Weimar Republic KPD: thus, their participation in the annual "Luxemburg-Liebknecht" demonstrations in Berlin every January, the fact that their national headquarters is the original KPD headquarters (Karl Liebknecht Haus) in Berlin, etc.

I'm not challenging this because I don't think it's an important enough a factoid for the reader, but just curious.

Thanks again for your contributions to the page. --langohio 16:44, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was nominally a merger of equals in 1946, so the SED was as much successor of the KPD as it was successor of the SPD. And both applies only to eastern Germany, as both the KPD and SPD continued to exist separately in western Germany after 1946. Rivarez 17:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

You need to settle down and stop edit warring. Tell me what you do not like about infoboxes? -- Netoholic @ 23:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You need to settle down and stop edit warring. I have nothing against infoboxes per se. I have something against those infoboxes that provide no new information and just repeat what's already in the article text. Rivarez 00:20, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You have been blocked for 24 hours for a 3RR violation on Sealand as per the reporting page. Sasquatcht|c 22:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly you do not appreciate the 3RR. Some discussion at Talk:Sealand would be nice, by the way. 24ip | lolol 01:56, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate it, so long as it is equally applied. But O^O was not blocked for his violation, so it seems to be a dead letter. Admins think they don't have to enforce the rule "if they don't feel like it". Rivarez 02:24, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]