Talk:Nia Technique: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
linking nianow twice |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Given the promotional nature of the article and the lack of references, I have removed the additional link to nianow.com per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 15:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC) |
Given the promotional nature of the article and the lack of references, I have removed the additional link to nianow.com per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. --[[User:Ronz|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz|talk]]) 15:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
:It is almost borderline about whether the article should remain or be deleted, although it does appear to be offered in a number of cities--[[User:Vannin|Vannin]] ([[User talk:Vannin|talk]]) 16:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:00, 4 October 2008
Advert
Simply, we have no secondary sources. We have not met WP:N. The only source is WP:SELFPUB. The two external links should be intergrated as sources and the article should be written from them with a careful eye to WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. --Ronz (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Given the promotional nature of the article and the lack of references, I have removed the additional link to nianow.com per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. --Ronz (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is almost borderline about whether the article should remain or be deleted, although it does appear to be offered in a number of cities--Vannin (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)