Jump to content

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lightbot (talk | contribs)
Date links per wp:mosnum/Other
added external links
Line 28: Line 28:
|LawsApplied=
|LawsApplied=
}}
}}
'''''Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.''''', [[Case citation|299 U.S. 65]] (1936), was a decision by the [[United States Supreme Court]], which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
'''''Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.''''', [[Case citation|299 U.S. 65]] (1936), was a decision by the [[United States Supreme Court]], which held that an inquiry into [[Indispensable party|indispensability]] would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.


==See also==
==See also==
Line 35: Line 35:
==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*{{cite journal |last=Colby |first=Wm. E. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1942 |month= |title=The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation |journal=California Law Review |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=245–271 |doi=10.2307/3477673 |url= |accessdate= |quote= }}
*{{cite journal |last=Colby |first=Wm. E. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1942 |month= |title=The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation |journal=California Law Review |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=245–271 |doi=10.2307/3477673 |url= |accessdate= |quote= }}

{{caselaw source
| case = Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936)
| findlaw = http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=299&page=65
| justia = http://supreme.justia.com/us/299/65/case.html
}}


[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court cases]]

Revision as of 03:12, 7 October 2008

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Argued October 12, 1936
Decided November 9, 1936
Full case nameBourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
Citations299 U.S. 65 (more)
Holding
An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Charles E. Hughes
Associate Justices
Willis Van Devanter · James C. McReynolds
Louis Brandeis · George Sutherland
Pierce Butler · Harlan F. Stone
Owen Roberts · Benjamin N. Cardozo
Case opinion
MajoritySutherland
Stone took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.

See also

Further reading

  • Colby, Wm. E. (1942). "The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation". California Law Review. 30 (3): 245–271. doi:10.2307/3477673. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |month= and |coauthors= (help)

Text of Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936) is available from: Findlaw Justia