Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ILLmacuLate: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relist of AfD |
delete |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
<hr style="width:50%;"/> |
||
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:RockManQ|<font color=#808080>'''RockManQ'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RockManQ|(talk)]]</sup> 01:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:RockManQ|<font color=#808080>'''RockManQ'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:RockManQ|(talk)]]</sup> 01:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
: '''Weak delete'''. I don't see how winning a minor award or being mentioned in a trivial contest quite qualifies. Still, it's marginal. [[User:Xihr|<span style="color: white; background: black; font-weight: bold; padding: 1px;"> Xihr </span>]] 04:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 04:07, 9 October 2008
- ILLmacuLate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC, no evidence of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 14:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Oh my oh my. The nominator deleted content from this article prior to making this nomination, content that helps to establish notability. I've restored it, and added a bunch of sources, enough to establish WP:GNG notability. Keep. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 21:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep - As far as I can tell he just meets one of the WP:MUSIC requirements for notability: "Has won or placed in a major music competition." I'm not sure if the Scribble Jam competition is truly "major", but I guess it'll do. (Changed from 'delete per nom')
SIS21:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- I was thinking that he meets WP:MUSIC criterion #1, which is WP:GNG. There's a rather detailed article about him in The Portland Mercury, and non-trivial mentions in several newspapers including the Chicago Tribune. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 21:50, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- The Chicago Tribune ref appears to write about the entire festival, not so much about the rapper, but I have no way to check that. The Portland Mercury looked a bit too local and "bloggy" to me. While winning the 2004 competition was beyond any doubt. So I went for the one requirement I was sure of.
SIS22:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- The Chicago Tribune ref appears to write about the entire festival, not so much about the rapper, but I have no way to check that. The Portland Mercury looked a bit too local and "bloggy" to me. While winning the 2004 competition was beyond any doubt. So I went for the one requirement I was sure of.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 23:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RockManQ (talk) 01:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC) - Weak delete. I don't see how winning a minor award or being mentioned in a trivial contest quite qualifies. Still, it's marginal. Xihr 04:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)