Jump to content

David Vitter: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Sardanaphalus (talk | contribs)
m updating link, possibly some formatting, using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Senator | name=David Vitter
{{Infobox Senator | name=David Vitter
| image name=David Vitter official portrait.jpg
|image name=David Vitter official portrait.jpg
| jr/sr=Junior Senator
|jr/sr=Junior Senator
| state=[[Louisiana]]
|state=[[Louisiana]]
| party=[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
|party=[[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]]
| term_start=[[January 3]], [[2005]]
|term_start=[[January 3]], [[2005]]
| alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]
|alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]
| preceded=[[John B. Breaux]]
|preceded=[[John B. Breaux]]
| succeeded= ''Incumbent'' (2011)
|succeeded= ''Incumbent'' (2011)
| state2=Louisiana
|state2=Louisiana
| district2=[[Louisiana's 1st congressional district|1st]]
|district2=[[Louisiana's 1st congressional district|1st]]
| term2=[[May 29]], [[1999]] – [[January 3]], [[2005]]
|term2=[[May 29]], [[1999]] – [[January 3]], [[2005]]
| preceded2=[[Bob Livingston]]
|preceded2=[[Bob Livingston]]
| succeeded2=[[Bobby Jindal]]
|succeeded2=[[Bobby Jindal]]
| state_house3 = Louisiana
|state_house3 = Louisiana
| district3 = 81
|district3 = 81
| term_start3 = 1992
|term_start3 = 1992
| term_end3 = 1999
|term_end3 = 1999
| preceded3 = [[David Duke]]
|preceded3 = [[David Duke]]
| succeeded3 = [[Jennifer Sneed]]
|succeeded3 = [[Jennifer Sneed]]
| date of birth={{birth date and age|1961|05|03}}
|date of birth={{birth date and age|1961|05|03}}
| place of birth=[[New Orleans, Louisiana|New Orleans]], [[Louisiana]]
|place of birth=[[New Orleans, Louisiana|New Orleans]], [[Louisiana]]
| dead=alive
|dead=alive
| residence= [[Metairie, Louisiana]]
|residence= [[Metairie, Louisiana]]
| occupation= attorney
|occupation= attorney
| law school=[[Tulane University]], 1988
|law school=[[Tulane University]], 1988
| spouse=Wendy Baldwin Vitter
|spouse=Wendy Baldwin Vitter
| children=Sophie Vitter<br>Lise Vitter<br>Airey Vitter<br>Jack Vitter
|children=Sophie Vitter<br>Lise Vitter<br>Airey Vitter<br>Jack Vitter
| alma_mater=[[Harvard University]]; [[Oxford University]]; [[Tulane Law School]]
|alma_mater=[[Harvard University]]; [[Oxford University]]; [[Tulane Law School]]
| religion=[[Roman Catholic]]
|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]
}}
}}
'''David Bruce Vitter''' (born [[May 3]], [[1961]]) is the [[Junior Senator|junior]] [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Louisiana]] and a member of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]. Formerly a member of the [[United States House of Representatives]], first elected in 1999, representing the [[suburbs|suburban]] [[Louisiana's 1st congressional district]], Vitter was elected to the Senate in 2004.
'''David Bruce Vitter''' (born [[May 3]], [[1961]]) is the [[Junior Senator|junior]] [[United States Senate|United States Senator]] from [[Louisiana]] and a member of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]]. Formerly a member of the [[United States House of Representatives]], first elected in 1999, representing the [[suburbs|suburban]] [[Louisiana's 1st congressional district]], Vitter was elected to the Senate in 2004.
Line 37: Line 37:


Vitter's stated positions include a [[Balanced Budget Amendment|balanced budget constitutional amendment]],<ref>{{cite web
Vitter's stated positions include a [[Balanced Budget Amendment|balanced budget constitutional amendment]],<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
|title= David Vitter Issues: Budget
|title=David Vitter Issues: Budget
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> abolishing the federal and state [[estate tax]],<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> abolishing the federal and state [[estate tax]],<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=99addac2-1509-4301-8567-baf556ac1a58
|title= David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood
|title=David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> increasing local police forces,<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> increasing local police forces,<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=79348266-f09a-4494-a2eb-2bd397b9eab9
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issue&ID=79348266-f09a-4494-a2eb-2bd397b9eab9
|title= David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs
|title=David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issues
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=legislation/issues
|title= David Vitter Issues
|title=David Vitter Issues
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 62: Line 62:
In July 2007, Vitter was identified as a client of "D.C. Madam" [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]]'s prostitution service in [[Washington, D.C.]]<ref name="CNN071007">{{cite web
In July 2007, Vitter was identified as a client of "D.C. Madam" [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]]'s prostitution service in [[Washington, D.C.]]<ref name="CNN071007">{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/10/vitter.madam/index.html
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/10/vitter.madam/index.html
|title= Hustler says it revealed senator's link to escort service
|title=Hustler says it revealed senator's link to escort service
|publisher= [[CNN]]
|publisher=[[CNN]]
|accessdate=2007-07-14}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-07-14}}</ref>


Line 78: Line 78:
In 2000 and 2002, Vitter won re-election with over 80 percent of the vote in what has become a safe Republican district.<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005">{{cite web
In 2000 and 2002, Vitter won re-election with over 80 percent of the vote in what has become a safe Republican district.<ref name="Almanac of American Politics-2005">{{cite web
|date=[[June 25]], [[2005]]
|date=[[June 25]], [[2005]]
|author= Jacoby, Mary
|author=Jacoby, Mary
|url= http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2006/people/la/las2.htm
|url=http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/almanac/2006/people/la/las2.htm
|title= Almanac of American Politics
|title=Almanac of American Politics
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>


=== 2002 gubernatorial race ===
=== 2002 gubernatorial race ===
In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican [[Murphy J. Foster, Jr.|Mike Foster]] prevented by term limits from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the [[Louisiana Weekly]] ran a story about Vitter's alleged relationship with a [[prostitute]], Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,<ref>Christopher Tidmore, [http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m "The Weekly's inside political track"], ''Louisiana Weekly'', March 29, 2004</ref> saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems. <ref>Schor, Elana and Sam Youngman, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-hides-as-the-senate-gop-circles-its-wagons-2007-07-11.html "Vitter hides as the Senate GOP circles its wagons"], ''The Hill'', July 11, 2007</ref>
In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican [[Murphy J. Foster, Jr.|Mike Foster]] prevented by term limits from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the [[Louisiana Weekly]] ran a story about Vitter's alleged relationship with a [[prostitute]], Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,<ref>Christopher Tidmore, [http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m "The Weekly's inside political track"], ''Louisiana Weekly'', March 29, 2004</ref> saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems.<ref>Schor, Elana and Sam Youngman, [http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-hides-as-the-senate-gop-circles-its-wagons-2007-07-11.html "Vitter hides as the Senate GOP circles its wagons"], ''The Hill'', July 11, 2007</ref>


==United States Senate==
==United States Senate==
Line 90: Line 90:
In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat [[John Breaux]] in the U.S. Senate. Former state Senator [[Dan Richey|Daniel Wesley Richey]], a Baton Rouge political consultant, directed Vitter's grassroots organization in the race, with assistance from Richey's longtime ally, former state Representative [[Woody Jenkins|Louis E. "Woody" Jenkins]] of Baton Rouge, himself a defeated U.S. Senate candidate in 1978, 1980, and 1996.
In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat [[John Breaux]] in the U.S. Senate. Former state Senator [[Dan Richey|Daniel Wesley Richey]], a Baton Rouge political consultant, directed Vitter's grassroots organization in the race, with assistance from Richey's longtime ally, former state Representative [[Woody Jenkins|Louis E. "Woody" Jenkins]] of Baton Rouge, himself a defeated U.S. Senate candidate in 1978, 1980, and 1996.


During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy [[affair]] with a [[prostitute]] in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."<ref name="WP-07-10-07">Shailagh Murray, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/09/AR2007070902030.html "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List"], ''Washington Post'', July 10, 2007</ref>
During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy [[affair]] with a [[prostitute]] in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."<ref name="WP-07-10-07">Shailagh Murray, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/09/AR2007070902030.html "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List"], ''Washington Post'', July 10, 2007</ref>


On [[November 2]], [[2004]], Vitter won the Louisiana senatorial [[jungle primary]] with 51.0 percent of the vote. The field of opponents including two major Democrats, then Seventh Congressional District Congressman [[Chris John|Christopher John]], who got 29.4 percent of the vote, and state Treasurer [[John N. Kennedy]] (no relation to the Massachusetts Kennedys), who got 15.1 percent.
On [[November 2]], [[2004]], Vitter won the Louisiana senatorial [[jungle primary]] with 51.0 percent of the vote. The field of opponents including two major Democrats, then Seventh Congressional District Congressman [[Chris John|Christopher John]], who got 29.4 percent of the vote, and state Treasurer [[John N. Kennedy]] (no relation to the Massachusetts Kennedys), who got 15.1 percent.


Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, [[William Pitt Kellogg]], was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the [[Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] went into effect in 1914.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, [[William Pitt Kellogg]], was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the [[Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution]] went into effect in 1914.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2004-11-01
|date=2004-11-01
|last= Rudin
|last=Rudin
|first= Ken
|first=Ken
|authorlink= Ken Rudin
|authorlink=Ken Rudin
|url= http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4136425
|url=http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4136425
|title= Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate
|title=Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate
|publisher= [[NPR]]
|publisher=[[NPR]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-30
|accessdate=2008-04-30
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 128: Line 128:
Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning [[Illegal immigration|illegal immigrants]]. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the [[Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007]] that would have granted legal status to 12 million undocumented workers coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as it was supported by President [[George W. Bush]], [[John McCain]], and [[Ted Kennedy]], among others. Vitter characterized the bill as amnesty which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of [[fear mongering]].<ref>{{cite web
Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning [[Illegal immigration|illegal immigrants]]. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the [[Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007]] that would have granted legal status to 12 million undocumented workers coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as it was supported by President [[George W. Bush]], [[John McCain]], and [[Ted Kennedy]], among others. Vitter characterized the bill as amnesty which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of [[fear mongering]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 22]], [[2007]]
|date=[[June 22]], [[2007]]
|url= http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/vitter_leads_opposition_to_imm.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/06/vitter_leads_opposition_to_imm.html
|title= Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill
|title=Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 18]], [[2007]]
|date=[[June 18]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21150
|url=http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21150
|title= Are Rational Immigration Laws a ‘Job American Politicians Won’t Do’?
|title=Are Rational Immigration Laws a ‘Job American Politicians Won’t Do’?
|publisher= [[Human Events]]
|publisher=[[Human Events]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 30]], [[2007]]
|date=[[May 30]], [[2007]]
|author= Rutenberg, Jim
|author=Rutenberg, Jim
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/washington/30immig.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/30/washington/30immig.html
|title= Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration
|title=Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration
|publisher= [[New York Times]]
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-12-07}}</ref>


In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding [[Community Oriented Policing Services]] funds from any [[sanctuary city]] which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the [[Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996|Illegal Immigration Act]]. Democratic Senator [[Dick Durbin]], in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of [[domestic violence]] or get vaccinations for their children. According to [[Fox News]], one senator remarked that the amendment would withhold funds for prostitution enforcement which was a problem for Vitter because of the D.C. Madam controversy. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding [[Community Oriented Policing Services]] funds from any [[sanctuary city]] which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the [[Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996|Illegal Immigration Act]]. Democratic Senator [[Dick Durbin]], in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of [[domestic violence]] or get vaccinations for their children. According to [[Fox News]], one senator remarked that the amendment would withhold funds for prostitution enforcement which was a problem for Vitter because of the D.C. Madam controversy. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 16]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 16]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,302464,00.html
|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,302464,00.html
|title= Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate
|title=Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate
|publisher= [[FOX News]]
|publisher=[[FOX News]]
|accessdate=2007-10-16}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-16}}</ref>


In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to confirm that customers were not illegal immigrants before providing them with banking or credit cards. [[As of May 2008]], no action is planned for the bill.<ref>{{cite web
In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to confirm that customers were not illegal immigrants before providing them with banking or credit cards. [[As of May 2008]], no action is planned for the bill.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 26]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 26]], [[2007]]
|author= Shields, Gerald
|author=Shields, Gerald
|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/11805796.html
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/11805796.html
|title= Washington Watch for November 26, 2007
|title=Washington Watch for November 26, 2007
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate=2007-11-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-26}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2393
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2393
|title= S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|title=S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|publisher= GovTrack.us
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-15}}</ref>
|accessdate=2008-01-15}}</ref>


In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals<ref>{{cite web
In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-05
|date=2008-03-05
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2713
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2713
|title= S. 2713--110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section...
|title=S. 2713--110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-06
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-05
|date=2008-03-05
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2714
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2714
|title= S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|title=S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-06
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref> and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-06
|date=2008-03-06
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20080306-6&bill=s110-2713
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20080306-6&bill=s110-2713
|title= Measures Placed on the Calendar
|title=Measures Placed on the Calendar
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-06
|accessdate=2008-05-06
|quote=
|quote=
}}</ref> in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for [[Illegal immigration to the United States#Border crossing|illegal border]] crossing, [[deportation]] for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single [[driving while intoxicated]], declaration of [[National language#United States|English as the official language]] (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies), additional construction of a [[United States–Mexico barrier|border fence]], permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. This package has little chance of being debated because the Democratic-controlled Senate prefers a comprehensive approach which would include a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for [[Illegal immigration to the United States#Border crossing|illegal border]] crossing, [[deportation]] for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single [[driving while intoxicated]], declaration of [[National language#United States|English as the official language]] (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies), additional construction of a [[United States–Mexico barrier|border fence]], permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. This package has little chance of being debated because the Democratic-controlled Senate prefers a comprehensive approach which would include a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-05
|date=2008-03-05
|last= Gaouette
|last=Gaouette
|first= Nicole
|first=Nicole
|url= http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-immig5mar05,1,5849195.story
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-immig5mar05,1,5849195.story
|title= GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package
|title=GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package
|publisher= [[The Los Angeles Times]]
|publisher=[[The Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-06
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In April 2008, Vitter introduced a [[joint resolution]] proposing a [[constitutional amendment]] that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful [[permanent resident]], or [[Alien (law)|alien]] serving in the military.<ref>{{cite web
In April 2008, Vitter introduced a [[joint resolution]] proposing a [[constitutional amendment]] that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful [[permanent resident]], or [[Alien (law)|alien]] serving in the military.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|title= S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship.
|title=S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship.
|publisher= GovTrack
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref> Currently the Constitution [[Citizenship Clause|grants citizenship]] to [[Birthright citizenship in the United States of America|children born within the U.S.]] regardless of the legal status of the parents.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-04-09}}</ref> Currently the Constitution [[Citizenship Clause|grants citizenship]] to [[Birthright citizenship in the United States of America|children born within the U.S.]] regardless of the legal status of the parents.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-03-10
|date=2007-03-10
|last= Ho
|last=Ho
|first= James C.
|first=James C.
|url= http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-ho10mar10,1,3646198.story?coll=la-news-comment
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-ho10mar10,1,3646198.story?coll=la-news-comment
|title= Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?
|title=Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?
|publisher= [[Los Angeles Times]]
|publisher=[[Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-05
|accessdate=2008-05-05
}}</ref> [[As of May 2008]], the resolution has no cosponsors.
}}</ref> [[As of May 2008]], the resolution has no cosponsors.


Line 210: Line 210:


In the aftermath of the disastrous [[Hurricane Katrina]] that devastated New Orleans in 2005, Vitter along with the entire Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.<ref>{{cite web
In the aftermath of the disastrous [[Hurricane Katrina]] that devastated New Orleans in 2005, Vitter along with the entire Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2005-10-05
|date=2005-10-05
|last= Hernandez
|last=Hernandez
|first= Raymond
|first=Raymond
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/national/nationalspecial/05rebuild.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/national/nationalspecial/05rebuild.html
|title= Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In
|title=Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In
|publisher= [[The New York Times]]
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 226: Line 226:
Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President [[George W. Bush|Bush]] vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President [[George W. Bush|Bush]] vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/10059676.html
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/10059676.html
|title= Our Views: State needs flood projects
|title=Our Views: State needs flood projects
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/OPINION01/709270329/1014/OPINION
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070927/OPINION01/709270329/1014/OPINION
|title= Federal water bill critical to state
|title=Federal water bill critical to state
|publisher= The Daily Advertiser
|publisher=The Daily Advertiser
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 2]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 2]], [[2007]]
|author= Alpert, Bruce
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url= http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/bush_vetoes_massive_water_bill.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/bush_vetoes_massive_water_bill.html
|title= Bush vetoes massive water resources bill
|title=Bush vetoes massive water resources bill
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref> Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref> Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 8]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 8]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Veto.html?hp
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Veto.html?hp
|title= Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill
|title=Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-11-08}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-11-08}}</ref>


Line 251: Line 251:
In September 2007, ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that Vitter and the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every [[public housing]] apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, [[Mary Landrieu]], the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.<ref>{{cite web
In September 2007, ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that Vitter and the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every [[public housing]] apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, [[Mary Landrieu]], the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 26]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 26]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190786785155740.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190786785155740.xml&coll=1
|title= Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units
|title=Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref name="NOCB120307">{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-27}}</ref><ref name="NOCB120307">{{cite web
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|author= Webster, Richard A.
|author=Webster, Richard A.
|url= http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=24990
|url=http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=24990
|title= Razing a ruckus
|title=Razing a ruckus
|publisher= New Orleans City Business
|publisher=New Orleans City Business
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> The [[Housing Authority of New Orleans|city housing authority]] is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> The [[Housing Authority of New Orleans|city housing authority]] is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|date=[[December 3]], [[2007]]
|author= Saluny, Susan
|author=Saluny, Susan
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/us/nationalspecial/03renters.html?pagewanted=1
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/us/nationalspecial/03renters.html?pagewanted=1
|title= New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage
|title=New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage
|publisher= [[New York Times]]
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In November, 2007, more than two dozen political action, faith-based and human rights organizations delivered a petition with more than 130,000 signatures asking that Vitter reconsider his position.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In November, 2007, more than two dozen political action, faith-based and human rights organizations delivered a petition with more than 130,000 signatures asking that Vitter reconsider his position.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 21]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 21]], [[2007]]
|author= Bronston, Barri
|author=Bronston, Barri
|url= http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/dont_be_a_turkey_housing_advoc.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/11/dont_be_a_turkey_housing_advoc.html
|title= Don't be a turkey, housing advocates tell Vitter
|title=Don't be a turkey, housing advocates tell Vitter
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-21}}</ref> In December 2007, Vitter killed the bill in committee.<ref name="NOCB120307" /> Some housing advocates charge that Vitter is stalling the bill in order to keep Landrieu from claiming a legislative victory one year in advance of her reelection, a charge Vitter denies, saying Landrieu was refusing to negotiate.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-21}}</ref> In December 2007, Vitter killed the bill in committee.<ref name="NOCB120307" /> Some housing advocates charge that Vitter is stalling the bill in order to keep Landrieu from claiming a legislative victory one year in advance of her reelection, a charge Vitter denies, saying Landrieu was refusing to negotiate.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 13]], [[2007]]
|date=[[December 13]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1197536913159340.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1197536913159340.xml&coll=1
|title= Quarrel stalls bill for public housing
|title=Quarrel stalls bill for public housing
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-02
|date=2008-04-02
|last= Raju
|last=Raju
|first= Manu
|first=Manu
|url= http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/landrieus-reelection-bid-made-difficult-by-vitter-2008-04-02.html
|url=http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/landrieus-reelection-bid-made-difficult-by-vitter-2008-04-02.html
|title= Landrieu’s reelection bid made difficult by Vitter
|title=Landrieu’s reelection bid made difficult by Vitter
|publisher= [[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|publisher=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 293: Line 293:
Vitter has won praise from [[pro-life]] groups for his stance against [[abortion]].<ref>{{cite web
Vitter has won praise from [[pro-life]] groups for his stance against [[abortion]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[February 1]], [[2001]]
|date=[[February 1]], [[2001]]
|url= http://www.nrlc.org/RU486/safegardbill.html
|url=http://www.nrlc.org/RU486/safegardbill.html
|title= Proposed Bill Would Reinstate Safeguards for Women Taking RU486
|title=Proposed Bill Would Reinstate Safeguards for Women Taking RU486
|publisher= Randall K. O'Bannon, Ph.D.
|publisher=Randall K. O'Bannon, Ph.D.
|accessdate=2007-12-11}}</ref> In 2001, he co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe [[RU-486]], a drug used in medical abortions. Vitter said, "The legislation is about protecting women's health" and criticized the FDA for "hurriedly" approving the drug. Several Democratic politicians and [[pro-choice]] groups condemned the bill, characterizing Vitter as an "antichoice extremist". The bill died in committee.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-11}}</ref> In 2001, he co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe [[RU-486]], a drug used in medical abortions. Vitter said, "The legislation is about protecting women's health" and criticized the FDA for "hurriedly" approving the drug. Several Democratic politicians and [[pro-choice]] groups condemned the bill, characterizing Vitter as an "antichoice extremist". The bill died in committee.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[February 7]], [[2001]]
|date=[[February 7]], [[2001]]
|url= http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=2709
|url=http://www.kaisernetwork.org/daily_reports/rep_index.cfm?DR_ID=2709
|title= Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy
|title=Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy
|publisher= [[Kaiser Permanente]]
|publisher=[[Kaiser Permanente]]
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h107-482
|title= H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act
|title=H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act
|publisher= GovTrack
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-12-10}}</ref>


In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment<ref>{{cite web
In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00379
|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00379
|title= On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )
|title=On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )
|publisher= [[United States Senate]]
|publisher=[[United States Senate]]
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref> barring all funds to health care providers and [[Planned Parenthood]] that provide health services (such as [[birth control|contraceptives]], [[Pap smear]]s, breast exams and tests for [[STDs]]) in addition to abortions. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance abortions. Vitter argued that the funds are used for [[Overhead (business)|overhead costs]] that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref> barring all funds to health care providers and [[Planned Parenthood]] that provide health services (such as [[birth control|contraceptives]], [[Pap smear]]s, breast exams and tests for [[STDs]]) in addition to abortions. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance abortions. Vitter argued that the funds are used for [[Overhead (business)|overhead costs]] that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|author= Alpert, Bruce
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1192804244133220.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1192804244133220.xml&coll=1
|title= Abortion plan is defeated in Senate
|title=Abortion plan is defeated in Senate
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 28]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 28]], [[2007]]
|author= Taylor, Andrew
|author=Taylor, Andrew
|url= http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSj9rQxYovv7EP4uGrPZ_dAqaoDgD8SBUTBG0
|url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iSj9rQxYovv7EP4uGrPZ_dAqaoDgD8SBUTBG0
|title= No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers
|title=No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers
|publisher= [[Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref> Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged
|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref> Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged
the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in
the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in
January 2007. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
January 2007. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-351
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-351
|title= S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act
|title=S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act
|publisher= GovTrack
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 12]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 12]], [[2007]]
|author= Ertelt, Steven
|author=Ertelt, Steven
|url= http://www.lifenews.com/nat3448.html
|url=http://www.lifenews.com/nat3448.html
|title= Senators Ask Democrats for Amendment Revoking Abortion Center Funding
|title=Senators Ask Democrats for Amendment Revoking Abortion Center Funding
|publisher= LifeNews.com
|publisher=LifeNews.com
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-11-17}}</ref>


In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with [[Indian Health Service]] funds except in the case of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is at risk.<ref>{{cite web
In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with [[Indian Health Service]] funds except in the case of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is at risk.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[January 17]], [[2008]]
|date=[[January 17]], [[2008]]
|author= Ertelt, Steven
|author=Ertelt, Steven
|url= http://www.lifenews.com/nat3629.html
|url=http://www.lifenews.com/nat3629.html
|title= Senator to Ensure Indian American Health Care Bill Doesn't Fund Abortions
|title=Senator to Ensure Indian American Health Care Bill Doesn't Fund Abortions
|publisher= LifeNews.com
|publisher=LifeNews.com
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s3896
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s3896
|title= S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds...
|title=S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds...
|publisher= GovTrack.us
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref> Vitter's amendment passed the Senate. If enacted into law, it will hold future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the [[Ronald Reagan]] White House.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-01-23}}</ref> Vitter's amendment passed the Senate. If enacted into law, it will hold future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the [[Ronald Reagan]] White House.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[February 26]], [[2008]]
|date=[[February 26]], [[2008]]
|author= KALB News Channel 5
|author=KALB News Channel 5
|url= http://www.kalb.com/index.php/news/article/senate-passes-vitter-amendment-to-prohibit-federal-funding-of-abortions/4025/
|url=http://www.kalb.com/index.php/news/article/senate-passes-vitter-amendment-to-prohibit-federal-funding-of-abortions/4025/
|title= Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions
|title=Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions
|publisher= KALB.com
|publisher=KALB.com
|accessdate=2008-02-27}}</ref>
|accessdate=2008-02-27}}</ref>


Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients along with other oversight regulations. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients along with other oversight regulations. [[As of May 2008]], the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-20
|date=2008-04-20
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|authorlink=
|authorlink=
|coauthors= Walsh, Bill
|coauthors=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1208669675248010.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1208669675248010.xml&coll=1
|title= On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties
|title=On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-31
|date=2008-03-31
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2788
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2788
|title= S. 2788--110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act,
|title=S. 2788--110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act,
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-06
|accessdate=2008-05-06
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 376: Line 376:


Rated A by the [[National Rifle Association]], Vitter has been a consistent champion of gun rights.<ref>{{cite web
Rated A by the [[National Rifle Association]], Vitter has been a consistent champion of gun rights.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/David_Vitter.htm#Gun_Control
|url=http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/David_Vitter.htm#Gun_Control
|title= David Vitter on the issues
|title=David Vitter on the issues
|publisher= On The Issues
|publisher=On The Issues
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> In April, 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the [[Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act]], to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02599:@@@D&summ2=m&|title=S.AMDT.S.2599 |publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an [[appropriation bill]] for the [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Department Of Homeland Security]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SP4615: |title=S.AMDT.4615|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> The bill became law in September, 2006 with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05441:@@@R|title=H.R.5441
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> In April, 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the [[Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act]], to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN02599:@@@D&summ2=m&|title=S.AMDT.S.2599 |publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an [[appropriation bill]] for the [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Department Of Homeland Security]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SP4615: |title=S.AMDT.4615|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref> The bill became law in September, 2006 with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:HR05441:@@@R|title=H.R.5441
|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref>
|publisher=[[US Library of Congress]] [[THOMAS]] database}}</ref>


In February 2008, Vitter, along with Senators [[Larry Craig]] and [[Mike Crapo]], blocked the [[Advice and consent|confirmation]] of [[Michael Sullivan (US Attorney)|Michael J. Sullivan]] as head of the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives]] saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.<ref>{{cite web
In February 2008, Vitter, along with Senators [[Larry Craig]] and [[Mike Crapo]], blocked the [[Advice and consent|confirmation]] of [[Michael Sullivan (US Attorney)|Michael J. Sullivan]] as head of the [[Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives]] saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for ''[[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-02-14
|date=2008-02-14
|last= Saltzman
|last=Saltzman
|first= Jonathan
|first=Jonathan
|url= http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/14/sullivan_atf_confirmation_blocked/
|url=http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/02/14/sullivan_atf_confirmation_blocked/
|title= Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked
|title=Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked
|publisher= [[The Boston Globe]]
|publisher=[[The Boston Globe]]
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-02-16
|date=2008-02-16
|url= http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/02/16/held_up_by_gun_lobby_radicals/
|url=http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2008/02/16/held_up_by_gun_lobby_radicals/
|title= Held up by gun-lobby radicals
|title=Held up by gun-lobby radicals
|publisher= [[The Boston Globe]]
|publisher=[[The Boston Globe]]
|accessdate=2008-02-06}}</ref> On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-02-06}}</ref> On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-02-25
|date=2008-02-25
|last= Schmitt
|last=Schmitt
|first= Richard B.
|first=Richard B.
|url= http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf25feb25,1,4119857.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-atf25feb25,1,4119857.story?ctrack=2&cset=true
|title= ATF nominee in the crossfire
|title=ATF nominee in the crossfire
|publisher= [[Los Angeles Times]]
|publisher=[[Los Angeles Times]]
|accessdate=2008-02-25}}</ref>
|accessdate=2008-02-25}}</ref>


Line 406: Line 406:


Vitter has argued for ethics reform and [[term limits]] since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter has argued for ethics reform and [[term limits]] since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-07-12
|date=2007-07-12
|last= Crouere
|last=Crouere
|first= Jeff
|first=Jeff
|url= http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_david_vit.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2007/07/the_rise_and_fall_of_david_vit.html
|title= The Rise and Fall of David Vitter
|title=The Rise and Fall of David Vitter
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-08
|accessdate=2008-05-08
}}</ref> As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratically controlled legislature.<ref name="NYT071408">{{cite web
}}</ref> As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratically controlled legislature.<ref name="NYT071408">{{cite web
|date= 1999-04-29
|date=1999-04-29
|last= Sack
|last=Sack
|first= Kevin
|first=Kevin
|url= http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504EFDE133DF93AA15757C0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9504EFDE133DF93AA15757C0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=2
|title= Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again
|title=Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again
|publisher= [[The New York Times]]
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-07-11
|date=2007-07-11
|last= Nossiter
|last=Nossiter
|first= Adam
|first=Adam
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html?fta=y
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html?fta=y
|title= A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|title=A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|publisher= [[The New York Times]]
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-09-09
|date=2007-09-09
|last= Hasten
|last=Hasten
|first= Mike
|first=Mike
|url= http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070909/NEWS01/709090347
|url=http://www.thetowntalk.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070909/NEWS01/709090347
|title= Republicans set sights on control of La. House
|title=Republicans set sights on control of La. House
|publisher= The Town Talk
|publisher=The Town Talk
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote=
|quote=
}}</ref><ref name="LC" /> The first election legislators were affected by the reform [[Louisiana state elections, 2007|occurred in 2007]].<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref name="LC" /> The first election legislators were affected by the reform [[Louisiana state elections, 2007|occurred in 2007]].<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-10-30
|date=2007-10-30
|last= Barrow
|last=Barrow
|first= Bill
|first=Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/term_limits_arent_gop_bonanza.html
|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/term_limits_arent_gop_bonanza.html
|title= Term limits aren't GOP bonanza
|title=Term limits aren't GOP bonanza
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref> In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a [[Political Action Committee]] with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority. Although it was well financed, Vitter's connection with prostitution may have decreased its effectiveness.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a [[Political Action Committee]] with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority. Although it was well financed, Vitter's connection with prostitution may have decreased its effectiveness.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-08-05
|date= 2007-08-05
|last= Barrow
|last=Barrow
|first= Bill
|first=Bill
|url= http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/47395/54420.html
|url=http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/47395/54420.html
|title= Quest for La. House will look past Vitter
|title=Quest for La. House will look past Vitter
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote= Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved
|quote=Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-12-06
|date=2007-12-06
|url= http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|title= The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|title=The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|publisher= LousianaConservative.com
|publisher=LousianaConservative.com
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
|quote=The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter’s involvement with prostitutes....
|quote=The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter’s involvement with prostitutes....
}}</ref> While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.<ref name="LC">{{cite web
}}</ref> While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.<ref name="LC">{{cite web
|date= 2007-12-06
|date=2007-12-06
|url= http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|url=http://louisianaconservative.com/?p=361
|title= The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|title=The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)
|publisher= LousianaConservative.com
|publisher=LousianaConservative.com
|accessdate= 2008-07-14
|accessdate=2008-07-14
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In spite of his state legislative efforts, Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999 which his opponent characterized as hypocritical. Vitter countered that unless it was universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.<ref name="NYT071408" /><ref>{{cite news
In spite of his state legislative efforts, Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999 which his opponent characterized as hypocritical. Vitter countered that unless it was universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.<ref name="NYT071408" /><ref>{{cite news
| last = Aynesworth
|last=Aynesworth
| first = Hugh
|first=Hugh
| title = Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign
|title=Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign
| pages = C4
|pages=C4
| publisher = [[The Washington Times]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
| date = [[April 18]], [[1999]]
|date=[[April 18]], [[1999]]
}}</ref> As a Senator, he has twice proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> As a Senator, he has twice proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-17
|date=2007-01-17
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-2
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj110-2
|title= S. J. Res. 2--110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|title=S. J. Res. 2--110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate= 2008-07-15
|accessdate=2008-07-15
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-17
|date=2007-01-17
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj109-3
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj109-3
|title= S. J. Res. 3--109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|title=S. J. Res. 3--109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate= 2008-07-15
|accessdate=2008-07-15
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, [[Jack Abramoff]] and [[Duke Cunningham]], Congress passed a [[Honest Leadership and Open Government Act|lobbying and ethics reform package]] to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.<ref name="WP091507">{{cite web
In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, [[Jack Abramoff]] and [[Duke Cunningham]], Congress passed a [[Honest Leadership and Open Government Act|lobbying and ethics reform package]] to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.<ref name="WP091507">{{cite web
|date= 2007-09-15
|date=2007-09-15
|last= Babington
|last=Babington
|first= Charles
|first=Charles
|url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/15/AR2007091500589.html
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/15/AR2007091500589.html
|title= Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill
|title=Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-04
|date=2007-01-04
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=s110-1
|title= S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|title=S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref name="amendments">{{cite web
}}</ref><ref name="amendments">{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-04
|date=2007-01-04
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=amendments&bill=s110-1
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=amendments&bill=s110-1
|title= Amendments to S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|title=Amendments to S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate = 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-01-04
|date=2008-01-04
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=98040c40-4d94-43cb-a56b-768a50da3bee
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=98040c40-4d94-43cb-a56b-768a50da3bee
|title= Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package
|title=Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-02-09
|date=2007-02-09
|url= http://citizensforethics.org/node/19553
|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/19553
|title= Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator
|title=Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator
|publisher= [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> created criminal penalties for legislators and [[executive branch]] officials who falsify financial reports,<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> created criminal penalties for legislators and [[executive branch]] officials who falsify financial reports,<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-10
|date=2007-01-10
|url= http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/20272
|url=http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/20272
|title= Senate cracks down on financial fraud
|title=Senate cracks down on financial fraud
|publisher= [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
|quote=
|quote=
}}</ref> and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with [[Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995|disclosure requirements]].<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with [[Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995|disclosure requirements]].<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-10
|date=2007-01-10
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s10
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s10
|title= S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying...
|title=S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate= 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.<ref name="CREW011107">{{cite web
}}</ref> The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.<ref name="CREW011107">{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-11
|date=2007-01-11
|url= http://citizensforethics.org/node/20247
|url=http://citizensforethics.org/node/20247
|title= Campaigns Still A Family Affair
|title=Campaigns Still A Family Affair
|publisher= [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref><ref name="GT011007SR" /> Additionally, they [[Table (parliamentary)|tabled]] his proposal to define [[Indian tribes]] as [[corporations]] and its members as [[stockholders]] so that they are required to contribute to candidates through [[political action committees]] instead of their tribal treasury.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref name="GT011007SR" /> Additionally, they [[Table (parliamentary)|tabled]] his proposal to define [[Indian tribes]] as [[corporations]] and its members as [[stockholders]] so that they are required to contribute to candidates through [[political action committees]] instead of their tribal treasury.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-10
|date=2007-01-10
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s5
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/amendment.xpd?session=110&amdt=s5
|title= S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of...
|title=S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of...
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate= 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for [[Unincorporated entity|unincorporated entities]] and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.<ref name="GT011007SR">{{cite web
}}</ref> Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for [[Unincorporated entity|unincorporated entities]] and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.<ref name="GT011007SR">{{cite web
|date= 2007-01-10
|date=2007-01-10
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070110-14&person=300065
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/record.xpd?id=110-s20070110-14&person=300065
|title= Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007
|title=Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007
|publisher= GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|publisher=GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation)
|accessdate= 2008-05-09
|accessdate=2008-05-09
}}</ref> The reform package became law in September 2007.<ref name="WP091507" />
}}</ref> The reform package became law in September 2007.<ref name="WP091507" />


Line 559: Line 559:
In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]] (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for [[Medicaid]] but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the [[1993 Clinton health care plan]] created by [[Hillary Clinton]] which proposed [[universal health care]].<ref>{{cite web
In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the [[State Children's Health Insurance Program]] (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for [[Medicaid]] but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the [[1993 Clinton health care plan]] created by [[Hillary Clinton]] which proposed [[universal health care]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190962325232900.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1190962325232900.xml&coll=1
|title= Senate OKs child health expansion
|title=Senate OKs child health expansion
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref> The increase passed the Senate, 67 to 29 but was later [[veto]]ed by President [[George W. Bush|Bush]].<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref> The increase passed the Senate, 67 to 29 but was later [[veto]]ed by President [[George W. Bush|Bush]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 6]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 6]], [[2007]]
|author= Pear, Robert
|author=Pear, Robert
|url= http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE7DE1130F935A35753C1A9619C8B63
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE7DE1130F935A35753C1A9619C8B63
|title= A Battle Foreshadowing a Larger Health Care War
|title=A Battle Foreshadowing a Larger Health Care War
|publisher= [[New York Times]]
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>


Line 574: Line 574:
In September 2007, during hearings of the [[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]], Vitter expressed serious doubts about the [[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]] treaty concerning issues of U.S. [[sovereignty]]<ref name="WT">{{cite web
In September 2007, during hearings of the [[Senate Foreign Relations Committee]], Vitter expressed serious doubts about the [[United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea]] treaty concerning issues of U.S. [[sovereignty]]<ref name="WT">{{cite web
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 28]], [[2007]]
|author= Sands, David R.
|author=Sands, David R.
|url= http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070928/FOREIGN/109280058/1003
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070928/FOREIGN/109280058/1003
|title= White House pushes sea treaty
|title=White House pushes sea treaty
|publisher= [[The Washington Times]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> echoing an array of anti-UN conservative groups against the treaty<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> echoing an array of anti-UN conservative groups against the treaty<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 16]], [[2004]]
|date=[[May 16]], [[2004]]
|url= http://lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/opeds.html
|url=http://lugar.senate.gov/sfrc/opeds.html
|title= Pass the sea treaty
|title=Pass the sea treaty
|publisher= [[Omaha World Herald]]
|publisher=[[Omaha World Herald]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref><ref name="WT" /> including [[The National Center for Public Policy Research]],<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref><ref name="WT" /> including [[The National Center for Public Policy Research]],<ref>{{cite web
|date=August, 2006
|date=August, 2006
|author= Ridenour, David A.
|author=Ridenour, David A.
|url= http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html
|url=http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA542LawoftheSeaTreaty.html
|title= Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage
|title=Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage
|publisher= [[The National Center for Public Policy Research]]
|publisher=[[The National Center for Public Policy Research]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> the [[Heritage Foundation]]<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> the [[Heritage Foundation]]<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 25]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 25]], [[2007]]
|author= Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer
|author=Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer
|url= http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/wm1638.cfm
|url=http://www.heritage.org/Research/InternationalOrganizations/wm1638.cfm
|title= The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
|title=The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea
|publisher= the [[Heritage Foundation]]
|publisher=the [[Heritage Foundation]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> and the [[Center for Security Policy]].<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> and the [[Center for Security Policy]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[May 18]], [[2004]]
|date=[[May 18]], [[2004]]
|author= [[Frank Gaffney|Gaffney Jr., Frank J.]]
|author=[[Frank Gaffney|Gaffney Jr., Frank J.]]
|url= http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200403181156.asp
|url=http://www.nationalreview.com/gaffney/gaffney200403181156.asp
|title= Don't Get LOST
|title=Don't Get LOST
|publisher= [[National Review]] Online
|publisher=[[National Review]] Online
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 24]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 24]], [[2007]]
|author= Scally, William
|author=Scally, William
|url= http://public.cq.com/docs/gs/greensheets110-000002591199.html
|url=http://public.cq.com/docs/gs/greensheets110-000002591199.html
|title= Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings
|title=Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings
|publisher= [[Congressional Quarterly]]
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> is supported by the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]], the [[United States Department of State|State Department]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]]<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> is supported by the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the [[United States Department of Defense|Pentagon]], the [[United States Department of State|State Department]] and [[United States Navy|Navy]]<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 6]], [[2007]]
|date=[[June 6]], [[2007]]
|author= Kraus, Don
|author=Kraus, Don
|url= http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4286
|url=http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4286
|title= Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea
|title=Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea
|publisher= [[Institute for Policy Studies]]
|publisher=[[Institute for Policy Studies]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 27]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpsea275391172sep27,0,1614204.story
|url=http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-vpsea275391172sep27,0,1614204.story
|title= Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance
|title=Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance
|publisher= [[Newsday]]
|publisher=[[Newsday]]
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The committee approved the treaty 17-4, with Vitter voting no.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-28}}</ref> The committee approved the treaty 17-4, with Vitter voting no.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 1]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 1]], [[2007]]
|author= Dinan, Stephen
|author=Dinan, Stephen
|url= http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071101/NATION/111010044/1001
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071101/NATION/111010044/1001
|title= Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms
|title=Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms
|publisher= [[The Washington Times]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Times]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref>


Line 629: Line 629:


Ever since his days in the Louisiana State Legislature, Vitter has been a longtime foe of gambling.<ref>{{cite web
Ever since his days in the Louisiana State Legislature, Vitter has been a longtime foe of gambling.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 1994-06-12
|date=1994-06-12
|last= Applebome
|last=Applebome
|first= Peter
|first=Peter
|authorlink= Peter Applebome
|authorlink=Peter Applebome
|url= http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9901E6DD113AF931A25755C0A962958260
|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9901E6DD113AF931A25755C0A962958260
|title= Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana
|title= Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana
|publisher= [[The New York Times]]
|publisher=[[The New York Times]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> Beginning in 2002, Vitter opposed the Indian group [[Jena Band of Choctaw Indians|Jena Band's]] bid to build a casino in Louisiana arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the [[United States Department of the Interior|Interior Department]] and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.<ref>{{cite news
}}</ref> Beginning in 2002, Vitter opposed the Indian group [[Jena Band of Choctaw Indians|Jena Band's]] bid to build a casino in Louisiana arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the [[United States Department of the Interior|Interior Department]] and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.<ref>{{cite news
| first = Schmidt
|first=Schmidt
| last = Susan
|last=Susan
| authorlink = Susan Schmidt
|authorlink=Susan Schmidt
| title = Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying
|title=Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying
| publisher = [[The Washington Post]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
| page = A01
|page=A01
| date = 2005-03-13
|date=2005-03-13
}}</ref> The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]] who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]] who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2005-07-28
|date=2005-07-28
|last= Walsh
|last=Walsh
|first= Bill
|first=Bill
|url= http://web.archive.org/web/20050907221410/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-1/112253289179960.xml
|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20050907221410/http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/washington/index.ssf?/base/news-1/112253289179960.xml
|title= McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul
|title=McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-14
|date=2008-04-14
|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/17646874.html
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/17646874.html
|title= Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks
|title=Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]] and [[WBRZ-TV]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=ff9b744f-cdc5-4b3a-bd56-03830a906218
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=ff9b744f-cdc5-4b3a-bd56-03830a906218
|title= Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act
|title=Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2676
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2676
|title= S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes
|title=S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes
|publisher= GovTrack
|publisher=GovTrack
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 674: Line 674:
In May 2001, Vitter authored an amendment to the [[No Child Left Behind Act]], a reauthorization of the [[Elementary and Secondary Education Act]], which required all secondary schools receiving federal funding to permit US military recruitment on school grounds and to provide the name, home phone number and address of every student enrolled to military recruiters, unless the student (or the student's parent) specifically opts out.<ref>{{cite web
In May 2001, Vitter authored an amendment to the [[No Child Left Behind Act]], a reauthorization of the [[Elementary and Secondary Education Act]], which required all secondary schools receiving federal funding to permit US military recruitment on school grounds and to provide the name, home phone number and address of every student enrolled to military recruiters, unless the student (or the student's parent) specifically opts out.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 17]], [[2005]]
|date=[[June 17]], [[2005]]
|url= http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159915,00.html
|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159915,00.html
|title= Parents Blast Military Recruiters at Schools
|title=Parents Blast Military Recruiters at Schools
|publisher= [[Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[April 23]], [[2003]]
|date=[[April 23]], [[2003]]
|author= Cavanagh, Sean
|author=Cavanagh, Sean
|url= http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/04/23/32recruit.h22.html
|url=http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/04/23/32recruit.h22.html
|title= Military Recruiters Meet Pockets of Resistance
|title=Military Recruiters Meet Pockets of Resistance
|publisher= [[Education Week]]
|publisher=[[Education Week]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.dod.mil/prhome/docs/no_child_act.pdf
|url=http://www.dod.mil/prhome/docs/no_child_act.pdf
|title= Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Section on Military recruitment (PDF - English)
|title=Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Section on Military recruitment (PDF - English)
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In February, 2007, Democratic Representative [[Michael M. Honda]] proposed the Student Privacy Protection Act of 2007 to change [[David Vitter#Military recruitment in high schools|Vitter's amendment]] from requiring high schools to provide [[military recruiters]] with students' personal information unless they explicitly [[opt-out]] to requiring the student's explicit consent first.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> In February, 2007, Democratic Representative [[Michael M. Honda]] proposed the Student Privacy Protection Act of 2007 to change [[David Vitter#Military recruitment in high schools|Vitter's amendment]] from requiring high schools to provide [[military recruiters]] with students' personal information unless they explicitly [[opt-out]] to requiring the student's explicit consent first.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01346:@@@L&summ2=m&
|url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HR01346:@@@L&summ2=m&
|title= H.R.1346
|title=H.R.1346
|publisher= [[The Library of Congress]]
|publisher=[[The Library of Congress]]
|accessdate=2008-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-04-21}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[March 6]], [[2007]]
|date=[[March 6]], [[2007]]
|author= Honda, Mike
|author=Honda, Mike
|url= http://mikehonda.blogspot.com/2007/03/military-recruiters-have-access-to-our.html
|url=http://mikehonda.blogspot.com/2007/03/military-recruiters-have-access-to-our.html
|title= Military recruiters have access to our children's personal information
|title=Military recruiters have access to our children's personal information
|publisher= [[Michael M. Honda|Mike M. Honda]]
|publisher=[[Michael M. Honda|Mike M. Honda]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> According to the [[Congressional Quarterly]], Vitter stands behind the current provision. He stated, if changed, families who supported military recruiting may miss out if required to opt-in.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> According to the [[Congressional Quarterly]], Vitter stands behind the current provision. He stated, if changed, families who supported military recruiting may miss out if required to opt-in.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 9]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 9]], [[2007]]
|author= Zeller, Shawn
|author=Zeller, Shawn
|url= http://public.cq.com/docs/cqw/weeklyreport110-000002546488.html
|url=http://public.cq.com/docs/cqw/weeklyreport110-000002546488.html
|title= Revisiting the No-Child Recruitment Plan
|title=Revisiting the No-Child Recruitment Plan
|publisher= [[Congressional Quarterly]]
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref>


In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite President Bush's and other conservative Republican's opposition, for the passage of the [[Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008]] which expanded educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning [[World War II]] veterans in the [[G.I. Bill]].<ref>{{cite web
In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite President Bush's and other conservative Republican's opposition, for the passage of the [[Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008]] which expanded educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning [[World War II]] veterans in the [[G.I. Bill]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=
|date=
|year=
|year=
|month=
|month=
|last= Lerman
|last=Lerman
|first= David
|first=David
|url= http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-now-webbgi.m22,0,5797943.story
|url=http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-now-webbgi.m22,0,5797943.story
|title= Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill
|title=Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill
|publisher= [[Daily Press (Virginia)|Daily Press]]
|publisher=[[Daily Press (Virginia)|Daily Press]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-22
|accessdate=2008-05-22
|quote=
|quote=
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-22
|date=2008-05-22
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Congress-Iraq-Funding.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/washington/AP-Congress-Iraq-Funding.html
|title= Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill
|title=Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-22
|accessdate=2008-05-22
|quote=
|quote=
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-22
|date=2008-05-22
|url= http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00137
|url=http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00137
|title= Vote Summary
|title=Vote Summary
|publisher= [[United States Senate]]
|publisher=[[United States Senate]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-22
|accessdate=2008-05-22
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


===School board prayers===
===School board prayers===
In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at [[Board of education|school board]] meetings in response to an earlier [[United States district court|district court]] decision that the Louisiana's [[Tangipahoa Parish]] practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was [[unconstitutional]]. The bill died in [[United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions|committee]].<ref>{{cite web
In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at [[Board of education|school board]] meetings in response to an earlier [[United States district court|district court]] decision that the Louisiana's [[Tangipahoa Parish]] practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was [[unconstitutional]]. The bill died in [[United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions|committee]].<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr109-132
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sr109-132
|title= S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|title=S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|publisher= GovTrack.us
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007">{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007">{{cite web
|date=[[January 20]], [[2007]]
|date=[[January 20]], [[2007]]
|author= Mitchell, David J.
|author=Mitchell, David J.
|url= http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1198586681.html?dids=1198586681:1198586681&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+20%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=3&desc=Prayer+decision+appealed+***+Tangipahoa+parties+say+ruling+unclear
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1198586681.html?dids=1198586681:1198586681&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Jan+20%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=3&desc=Prayer+decision+appealed+***+Tangipahoa+parties+say+ruling+unclear
|title= Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear
|title=Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate=2008-01-16
|accessdate=2008-01-16
|archiveurl = http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2007/01/courts_motion_t.html
|archiveurl=http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2007/01/courts_motion_t.html
|archivedate=2007-01-20
|archivedate=2007-01-20
}}</ref> Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a [[panel]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|Fifth Circuit Court]] concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether [[nonsectarian]] prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of [[Standing (law)|standing]]. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a [[panel]] of the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|Fifth Circuit Court]] concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether [[nonsectarian]] prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of [[Standing (law)|standing]]. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. [[As of May 2008]], Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=sr110-35
|url=http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?tab=main&bill=sr110-35
|title= S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|title=S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings
|publisher= GovTrack.us
|publisher=GovTrack.us
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007" /><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref name="advocate012007" /><ref>{{cite web
|date=December, 2006
|date=December, 2006
|url= http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&CID=468&DID=39876
|url=http://www.nsba.org/site/doc_cosa.asp?TRACKID=&CID=468&DID=39876
|title=
|title=
Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)
Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)
|publisher= [[National School Boards Association]]
|publisher=[[National School Boards Association]]
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-01-16}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[August 22]], [[2007]]
|date=[[August 22]], [[2007]]
|author= Mitchell, David J.
|author=Mitchell, David J.
|url= http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1324471571.html?dids=1324471571:1324471571&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Aug+22%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Tangipahoa+board+OKs+prayer+policy
|url=http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/theadvocate/access/1324471571.html?dids=1324471571:1324471571&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Aug+22%2C+2007&author=DAVID+J.+MITCHELL&pub=Advocate&edition=&startpage=1&desc=Tangipahoa+board+OKs+prayer+policy
|title= Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy
|title=Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate= 2008-01-16
|accessdate=2008-01-16
|archiveurl= http://melissarogers.typepad.com/melissa_rogers/2007/08/the-tangipahoa-.html
|archiveurl=http://melissarogers.typepad.com/melissa_rogers/2007/08/the-tangipahoa-.html
|archivedate=2007-08-22}}</ref>
|archivedate=2007-08-22}}</ref>


Line 767: Line 767:
Vitter advocated [[abstinence-only sex education]], emphasizing abstinence while excluding issues involving [[birth control]] and [[safe sex]].<ref>{{cite web
Vitter advocated [[abstinence-only sex education]], emphasizing abstinence while excluding issues involving [[birth control]] and [[safe sex]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 25]], [[2007]]
|date=[[June 25]], [[2007]]
|author= Vitter, David
|author=Vitter, David
|url= http://www.vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=76b86c7e-a51a-4d11-92e7-de11d999f313
|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=76b86c7e-a51a-4d11-92e7-de11d999f313
|title= Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program
|title=Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program
|publisher= David Vitter press release
|publisher=David Vitter press release
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[June 21]], [[2007]]
|date=[[June 21]], [[2007]]
|author= Vitter, David and Bunning, Jim
|author=Vitter, David and Bunning, Jim
|url= http://www.vitter.senate.gov/forms/abstinenceLetter.pdf
|url=http://www.vitter.senate.gov/forms/abstinenceLetter.pdf
|title= Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee
|title=Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> According to [[Focus on the Family]], Vitter was one of three conservative senators that convinced Democratic Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] to withdraw an amendment that would have restricted abstinence education to programs deemed to be "medically accurate".<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> According to [[Focus on the Family]], Vitter was one of three conservative senators that convinced Democratic Senator [[Frank Lautenberg]] to withdraw an amendment that would have restricted abstinence education to programs deemed to be "medically accurate".<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000005766.cfm
|url=http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000005766.cfm
|title= Federal Abstinence Funding Safe for Another Year
|title=Federal Abstinence Funding Safe for Another Year
|publisher= [[Focus on the Family]]
|publisher=[[Focus on the Family]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 24]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2007/10/lautenberg_gives_on_fight_abou.html
|url=http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2007/10/lautenberg_gives_on_fight_abou.html
|title= Lautenberg gives up on fight about 'abstinence-only' sex education
|title=Lautenberg gives up on fight about 'abstinence-only' sex education
|publisher= [[The Star-Ledger]]
|publisher=[[The Star-Ledger]]
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-24}}</ref>


===Same-sex marriage ===
===Same-sex marriage ===
Vitter professes that marriage is a sacred vow between a man and a woman. In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same sex marriages.<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.56.IH: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56] May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)</ref> In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values."<ref>{{cite web
Vitter professes that marriage is a sacred vow between a man and a woman. In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same sex marriages.<ref>[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.J.RES.56.IH: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56] May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)</ref> In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values."<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.vitter2004.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=20
|url=http://www.vitter2004.com/News/Read.aspx?ID=20
|title= Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage
|title=Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage
|publisher= Vitter2004.com
|publisher=Vitter2004.com
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."<ref>[http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/06/same.sex.marriage/ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'"], ''CNN'', June 7, 2006</ref> In 2006, he told ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'', “I’m a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history.”<ref name="NYT071107">{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."<ref>[http://edition.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/06/same.sex.marriage/ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'"], ''CNN'', June 7, 2006</ref> In 2006, he told ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'', “I’m a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history.”<ref name="NYT071107">{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author= Norrister, Adam
|author=Norrister, Adam
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/us/11vitter.html
|title= A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|title=A Senator’s Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky
|publisher= [[New York Times]]
|publisher=[[New York Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>


In October 2005, at a [[Lafayette Parish]] Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions." <ref>[http://www.gayapolis.com/news/artdisplay.php?artid=535 "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage"], gayapolis.com, ''News'', posted October 18, 2005; accessed July 10, 2007</ref>
In October 2005, at a [[Lafayette Parish]] Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions."<ref>[http://www.gayapolis.com/news/artdisplay.php?artid=535 "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage"], gayapolis.com, ''News'', posted October 18, 2005; accessed July 10, 2007</ref>


=== Louisiana Family Forum earmark ===
=== Louisiana Family Forum earmark ===
Line 808: Line 808:
In September, 2007, Vitter [[earmarking|earmarked]] $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the [[Louisiana Family Forum]],<ref name="T-P092207">{{cite web
In September, 2007, Vitter [[earmarking|earmarked]] $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the [[Louisiana Family Forum]],<ref name="T-P092207">{{cite web
|date=[[September 22]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 22]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, David
|author=Walsh, David
|url= http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/09/vitter_earmarked_federal_money.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/09/vitter_earmarked_federal_money.html
|title= Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group
|title=Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group
|publisher= [[Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-24}}</ref> known for challenging [[evolution]] by means of "[[Teach the Controversy|teaching the controversy]]" which promotes [[intelligent design]] while discrediting evolution.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-24}}</ref> known for challenging [[evolution]] by means of "[[Teach the Controversy|teaching the controversy]]" which promotes [[intelligent design]] while discrediting evolution.<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.lafamilyforum.org/explore.cfm/forumnotes/originsscience
|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.org/explore.cfm/forumnotes/originsscience
|title= Origins Science
|title=Origins Science
|publisher= [[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".<ref name="T-P092207" /> Though the Louisiana Family Forum is largely forbidden from political activity due to its non-profit status,<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".<ref name="T-P092207" /> Though the Louisiana Family Forum is largely forbidden from political activity due to its non-profit status,<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html
|url=http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=163395,00.html
|title= Political Campaign Activity
|title=Political Campaign Activity
|publisher= [[Internal Revenue Service]]
|publisher=[[Internal Revenue Service]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.<ref name="T-P092207" /> However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of [[Rudy Giuliani]].<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.<ref name="T-P092207" /> However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of [[Rudy Giuliani]].<ref>{{cite web
|url= http://www.lafamilyforum.us/FFarchives/v9i11.htm
|url=http://www.lafamilyforum.us/FFarchives/v9i11.htm
|title= Vitter Sends Shockwaves
|title=Vitter Sends Shockwaves
|publisher= [[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|publisher=[[Louisiana Family Forum]]
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-11-10}}</ref>


On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization [[People For the American Way]], along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.<ref>{{cite web
On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization [[People For the American Way]], along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1017-09.htm
|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2007/1017-09.htm
|title= Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill
|title=Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill
|publisher= [[Common Dreams NewsCenter]]
|publisher=[[Common Dreams NewsCenter]]
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 17]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=24825
|url=http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=24825
|title=Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed
|title=Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed
|publisher= [[People For the American Way]]
|publisher=[[People For the American Way]]
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref> Vitter later withdrew it.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-10-17}}</ref> Vitter later withdrew it.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 19]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1192776477212740.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1192776477212740.xml&coll=1
|title= Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group
|title=Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-02}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 18]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 18]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2007/US/216_vitter_earmark_withdrawn_10_18_2007.asp
|url=http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2007/US/216_vitter_earmark_withdrawn_10_18_2007.asp
|title= Vitter earmark withdrawn
|title=Vitter earmark withdrawn
|publisher= [[National Center for Science Education]]
|publisher=[[National Center for Science Education]]
|accessdate=2007-10-18}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-18}}</ref>


Line 852: Line 852:


In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the [[Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act]] which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national [[sex offender registry]], provides resources for tracking down unregistered offenders and increases penalties for the sexual assault of children. His amendment received bi-partisan support.<ref>{{cite web
In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the [[Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act]] which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national [[sex offender registry]], provides resources for tracking down unregistered offenders and increases penalties for the sexual assault of children. His amendment received bi-partisan support.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-01
|date=2008-05-01
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/library-146/1209619943213470.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/library-146/1209619943213470.xml&coll=1
|title= Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act
|title=Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-01
|accessdate=2008-05-01
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|url= http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=419f0956-0443-4291-8a55-90adcdf48483
|url=http://vitter.senate.gov/?module=PressRoom/PressItem&ID=419f0956-0443-4291-8a55-90adcdf48483
|title= Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act
|title=Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act
|publisher= [[David Vitter]]
|publisher=[[David Vitter]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-01
|accessdate=2008-05-01
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


===Republican Party reputation===
===Republican Party reputation===
With concerns being raised about the Republican Party's prospects in the [[United States general elections, 2008|2008 election]], Vitter said, "[I]t's certainly true that national Republicans need to improve their brand. Perhaps folks should actually take some cues from Republicans in Louisiana. At home, we're the party of reform and positive changes versus failed past and the good ol' boys."<ref>{{cite web
With concerns being raised about the Republican Party's prospects in the [[United States general elections, 2008|2008 election]], Vitter said, "[I]t's certainly true that national Republicans need to improve their brand. Perhaps folks should actually take some cues from Republicans in Louisiana. At home, we're the party of reform and positive changes versus failed past and the good ol' boys."<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-22
|date=2008-05-22
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-2/121134783819620.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-2/121134783819620.xml&coll=1
|title= Republicans fret about fate this fall
|title=Republicans fret about fate this fall
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate= 2008-05-22
|accessdate=2008-05-22
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 882: Line 882:
In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]], also known as the "D.C. [[pimp|Madam]]", convicted by the U.S. government for running a [[prostitution]] service. ''[[Hustler]]'' magazine identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.<ref>{{cite web
In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by [[Deborah Jeane Palfrey]], also known as the "D.C. [[pimp|Madam]]", convicted by the U.S. government for running a [[prostitution]] service. ''[[Hustler]]'' magazine identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author= Rood, Justin
|author=Rood, Justin
|url= http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/hustler-call-pr.html
|url=http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/hustler-call-pr.html
|title= 'Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission
|title='Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission
|publisher= [[ABC News]]
|publisher=[[ABC News]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-16
|date=2008-04-16
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/us/16escort.html?ref=us
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/us/16escort.html?ref=us
|title= Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case
|title=Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-21
|accessdate=2008-04-21
}}</ref> The following day, Vitter issued a written statement:
}}</ref> The following day, Vitter issued a written statement:


<blockquote>This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.<ref>Douglass K. Daniel, [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/vitter_dc_madam "Senator's number on escort service list"], Associated Press, July 10, 2007</ref></blockquote>
<blockquote>This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.<ref>Douglass K. Daniel, [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_co/vitter_dc_madam "Senator's number on escort service list"], Associated Press, July 10, 2007</ref></blockquote>


The statement containing Vitter's apology said his telephone number was included in phone records dating from his days as a member of the House of Representatives.<ref name="WP-07-10-07"/> Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times, the first on [[October 12]], [[1999]], and the last on [[February 27]], [[2001]].<ref> Keith I. Marszalek, [http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_had_five_calls_with_dc.html "Vitter had five calls with D.C. Madam"], ''New Orleans Times-Picayune'', [[July 11]], [[2007]]</ref> Two calls were placed while House roll call votes were in progress.<ref> Charles Babington, [http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/07/escort_service_called_lawmaker.php "Escort service called lawmaker 5 times"], AP News, [[July 12]], [[2007]]</ref>
The statement containing Vitter's apology said his telephone number was included in phone records dating from his days as a member of the House of Representatives.<ref name="WP-07-10-07"/> Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times, the first on [[October 12]], [[1999]], and the last on [[February 27]], [[2001]].<ref> Keith I. Marszalek, [http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_had_five_calls_with_dc.html "Vitter had five calls with D.C. Madam"], ''New Orleans Times-Picayune'', [[July 11]], [[2007]]</ref> Two calls were placed while House roll call votes were in progress.<ref> Charles Babington, [http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2007/07/escort_service_called_lawmaker.php "Escort service called lawmaker 5 times"], AP News, [[July 12]], [[2007]]</ref>


On [[July 16]], [[2007]], after a week of self imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a [[press conference]]. Standing next to his wife, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, Wendy Vitter, his wife, spoke. Both refused to answer any questions.<ref>{{cite news
On [[July 16]], [[2007]], after a week of self imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a [[press conference]]. Standing next to his wife, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, Wendy Vitter, his wife, spoke. Both refused to answer any questions.<ref>{{cite news
| title = Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence
|title=Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence
| publisher = [[CNN.com]]
|publisher=[[CNN.com]]
| date = [[July 17]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 17]], [[2007]]
| url = http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/16/vitter/index.html
|url=http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/16/vitter/index.html
| accessdate = 2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
| title = Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise
|title=Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise
| publisher = [[Louisiana Weekly]]
|publisher=[[Louisiana Weekly]]
| date = [[July 23]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
| url = http://www.louisianaweekly.com/read/PDF/July_23_2007.pdf
|url=http://www.louisianaweekly.com/read/PDF/July_23_2007.pdf
| accessdate = 2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref><ref>{{cite news
| last = Moran
|last=Moran
| first = Kate
|first=Kate
| last = Walsh
|last=Walsh
| first = Bill
|first=Bill
| last = McCarthy
|last=McCarthy
| first = Brendan
|first=Brendan
| coauthors =
|coauthors=
| title = Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness
|title=Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness
| publisher = [[The Times Picayune|The Times Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times Picayune|The Times Picayune]]
| date = [[July 16]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 16]], [[2007]]
| url = http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/07/vitter_reemerges_and_again_ask.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/times-picayune/2007/07/vitter_reemerges_and_again_ask.html
| accessdate = 2008-08-24}}</ref>
|accessdate=2008-08-24}}</ref>


As background, several news outlets reported that in May 1999, Vitter replaced Congressman [[Bob Livingston]] after Livingston resigned due to an adultery scandal.<ref name="CNN071007" /><ref name="AP071007" /><ref name="NYT071107" /> Vitter said about Livingston's decision to resign, "It's obviously a tremendous loss for the state. I think Livingston's stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess", referring to the [[Lewinsky scandal|Monica Lewinsky scandal]] of President [[Bill Clinton]].<ref>{{cite news
As background, several news outlets reported that in May 1999, Vitter replaced Congressman [[Bob Livingston]] after Livingston resigned due to an adultery scandal.<ref name="CNN071007" /><ref name="AP071007" /><ref name="NYT071107" /> Vitter said about Livingston's decision to resign, "It's obviously a tremendous loss for the state. I think Livingston's stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess", referring to the [[Lewinsky scandal|Monica Lewinsky scandal]] of President [[Bill Clinton]].<ref>{{cite news
| last = Konigsmark
|last=Konigsmark
| first = Anne Rochell
|first=Anne Rochell
| coauthors =
|coauthors=
| title = A Week Of Crisis Impeachment: The Speakership Livingston's Constituents Decision to resign jolts home district
|title=A Week Of Crisis Impeachment: The Speakership Livingston's Constituents Decision to resign jolts home district
| pages = D4
|pages=D4
| publisher = [[The Atlanta Journal-Constitution|The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution]]
|publisher=[[The Atlanta Journal-Constitution|The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution]]
| date = [[December 20]], [[1998]]
|date=[[December 20]], [[1998]]
| url = http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=0EADA4168D35692C
|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=doc&p_docid=0EADA4168D35692C
| accessdate = 2007-07-10 }}</ref> In 2000, his wife, Wendy Vitter, commenting on the same scandal, said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he [Vitter] does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not [[alimony]], trust me," referring to the [[John and Lorena Bobbitt|incident of Lorena Bobbitt]] severing the [[penis]] of her husband and to Clinton's wife, [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|Hillary Clinton]].<ref name="AP071007">{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-10 }}</ref> In 2000, his wife, Wendy Vitter, commenting on the same scandal, said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he [Vitter] does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not [[alimony]], trust me," referring to the [[John and Lorena Bobbitt|incident of Lorena Bobbitt]] severing the [[penis]] of her husband and to Clinton's wife, [[Hillary Rodham Clinton|Hillary Clinton]].<ref name="AP071007">{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Vitter-DC-Madam.html
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Vitter-DC-Madam.html
|title= Senator's Link to 'D.C. Madam' Exposed
|title=Senator's Link to 'D.C. Madam' Exposed
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref>


Vitter is unlikely to face criminal charges due to the [[statute of limitations]].<ref>{{cite web
Vitter is unlikely to face criminal charges due to the [[statute of limitations]].<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author= Alpert, Bruce
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url= http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_unlikely_to_face_crimin.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/vitter_unlikely_to_face_crimin.html
|title= Vitter unlikely to face criminal charges
|title=Vitter unlikely to face criminal charges
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> Vitter apologized to GOP senate colleagues but avoided the press who repeatedly attempted to talk to him. <ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071700754.html "Vitter Returns to Senate"] ''Washington Post'', [[July 17]], [[2007]]</ref>
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> Vitter apologized to GOP senate colleagues but avoided the press who repeatedly attempted to talk to him.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071700754.html "Vitter Returns to Senate"] ''Washington Post'', [[July 17]], [[2007]]</ref>


On [[November 13]], [[2007]], the attorney for Palfrey served Vitter with a [[subpoena]] to force him to testify at a [[November 28]], [[2007]] hearing about whether an act of prostitution occurred with a Palfrey escort and when.<ref>{{cite web
On [[November 13]], [[2007]], the attorney for Palfrey served Vitter with a [[subpoena]] to force him to testify at a [[November 28]], [[2007]] hearing about whether an act of prostitution occurred with a Palfrey escort and when.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 14]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 14]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1195021839260630.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1195021839260630.xml&coll=1
|title= Senator receives subpoena to testify about escort use
|title=Senator receives subpoena to testify about escort use
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 15]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 15]], [[2007]]
|author= Shields, Gerald
|author=Shields, Gerald
|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/11334446.html
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/politics/11334446.html
|title= Attorney doesn’t answer queries on Vitter plans
|title=Attorney doesn’t answer queries on Vitter plans
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)]]
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref> The following week, the judge in the case canceled the hearing.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-15}}</ref> The following week, the judge in the case canceled the hearing.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[November 22]], [[2007]]
|date=[[November 22]], [[2007]]
|url= http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g0GRboB6AYFOiN7iJ5pjjWUJbyXAD8T2BBR80
|url=http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g0GRboB6AYFOiN7iJ5pjjWUJbyXAD8T2BBR80
|title= Senator Spared Testimony in Escort Case
|title=Senator Spared Testimony in Escort Case
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate=2007-11-22}}</ref> Palfrey's attorney indicated he planned to subpoena Vitter to testify at her 2008 criminal trial,<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-11-22}}</ref> Palfrey's attorney indicated he planned to subpoena Vitter to testify at her 2008 criminal trial,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 2]], [[2007]]
|date=[[December 2]], [[2007]]
|author= Alpert, Bruce and Walsh, Bill
|author=Alpert, Bruce and Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1196578651143040.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1196578651143040.xml&coll=1
|title= Vitter avoids talking about escort for now
|title=Vitter avoids talking about escort for now
|publisher= [[New Orleans Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[New Orleans Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> even though Vitter might have [[Pleading the Fifth|pled the Fifth]] [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Amendment]] to avoid [[self-incrimination]]<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-03}}</ref> even though Vitter might have [[Pleading the Fifth|pled the Fifth]] [[Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution|Amendment]] to avoid [[self-incrimination]]<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-05
|date=2008-04-05
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|url= http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1207374643201790.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-2/1207374643201790.xml&coll=1
|title= Vitter might take the Fifth
|title=Vitter might take the Fifth
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> but in the end he wasn't called to testify.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> but in the end he wasn't called to testify.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-14
|date=2008-04-14
|last= Crabtree
|last=Crabtree
|first= Susan
|first=Susan
|url= http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-wont-testify-in-d.c.-madam-case-2008-04-14.html
|url=http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/vitter-wont-testify-in-d.c.-madam-case-2008-04-14.html
|title= Vitter won’t testify in D.C. Madam case
|title=Vitter won’t testify in D.C. Madam case
|publisher= [[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|publisher=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-14
|accessdate=2008-04-14
}}</ref> Vitter refused to comment on the matter.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> Vitter refused to comment on the matter.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-07
|date=2008-04-07
|url= http://www.wafb.com/Global/story.asp?S=8127890
|url=http://www.wafb.com/Global/story.asp?S=8127890
|title= Sen. David Vitter Placed on Witness List in Prostitution Trial; Driver Backs into "No Parking" Sign
|title=Sen. David Vitter Placed on Witness List in Prostitution Trial; Driver Backs into "No Parking" Sign
|publisher= [[WAFB]]
|publisher=[[WAFB]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-14
|accessdate=2008-04-14
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


After Senator [[Larry Craig]] was admonished by the [[United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics|Senate Ethics Committee]] for acting improperly after his arrest for lewd contact toward another man in an airport bathroom in February 2008, the [[Watchdog journalism|watchdog group]] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]] questioned why the committee had not taken similar action against Vitter.<ref>{{cite web
After Senator [[Larry Craig]] was admonished by the [[United States Senate Select Committee on Ethics|Senate Ethics Committee]] for acting improperly after his arrest for lewd contact toward another man in an airport bathroom in February 2008, the [[Watchdog journalism|watchdog group]] [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]] questioned why the committee had not taken similar action against Vitter.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-02-14
|date=2008-02-14
|url= http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0214-07.htm
|url=http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0214-07.htm
|title= CREW Asks Why Senate Ethics Committee Admonished Senator Craig and Not Sen. Vitter
|title=CREW Asks Why Senate Ethics Committee Admonished Senator Craig and Not Sen. Vitter
|publisher= [[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|publisher=[[Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington]]
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> The committee later dismissed the complaint.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2008-02-16}}</ref> The committee later dismissed the complaint.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-08
|date=2008-05-08
|last= Pershing
|last=Pershing
|first= Ben
|first=Ben
|url= http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/05/senate_ethics_dismisses_vitter.html
|url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2008/05/senate_ethics_dismisses_vitter.html
|title= Senate Ethics Dismisses Vitter Complaint
|title=Senate Ethics Dismisses Vitter Complaint
|publisher= [[The Washington Post]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-08
|accessdate=2008-05-08
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Vitter incurred significant legal and [[public relations]] expenses in his efforts to avoid giving testimony in the Palfrey trial and to respond to the ethics complaint. Consequently, his attorneys sought permission from the [[Federal Election Commission]] to use campaign funds to pay for these expenses.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter incurred significant legal and [[public relations]] expenses in his efforts to avoid giving testimony in the Palfrey trial and to respond to the ethics complaint. Consequently, his attorneys sought permission from the [[Federal Election Commission]] to use campaign funds to pay for these expenses.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-08-20
|date=2008-08-20
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/08/dc_madam_case_could_hit_vitter.html
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/08/dc_madam_case_could_hit_vitter.html
|title='D.C. Madam' case could hit Vitter in his wallet
|title='D.C. Madam' case could hit Vitter in his wallet
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-08-24
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-08-21
|date=2008-08-21
|last= Duncan
|last=Duncan
|first= Thomasenia P., et. al.
|first=Thomasenia P., et. al.
|url= http://fec.gov/agenda/2008/mtgdoc08-20.pdf
|url=http://fec.gov/agenda/2008/mtgdoc08-20.pdf
|title= Agenda Document No. 08-20
|title=Agenda Document No. 08-20
|publisher= [[Federal Elections Commission]]
|publisher=[[Federal Elections Commission]]
|accessdate= 2008-08-24
|accessdate=2008-08-24
|format=PDF
|format=PDF
}}</ref> The Commission, along partisan lines, couldn't agree whether funds could be used for reimbursing costs related to the Palfrey trial but did allow them to pay for expenses connected to the Ethics Committee complaint.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> The Commission, along partisan lines, couldn't agree whether funds could be used for reimbursing costs related to the Palfrey trial but did allow them to pay for expenses connected to the Ethics Committee complaint.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-08-21
|date=2008-08-21
|last= Cadei
|last=Cadei
|first= Emily
|first=Emily
|url=http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000002939949
|url=http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000002939949
|title= FEC Punts on McCain and Vitter
|title=FEC Punts on McCain and Vitter
|publisher= [[Congressional Quarterly]]
|publisher=[[Congressional Quarterly]]
|accessdate= 2008-08-24
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-08-21
|date=2008-08-21
|last= Holland
|last=Holland
|first= Jesse J.
|first=Jesse J.
|url=http://www.examiner.com/a-1548463~Vitter_can_use_some_campaign_funds_for_legal_fees.html
|url=http://www.examiner.com/a-1548463~Vitter_can_use_some_campaign_funds_for_legal_fees.html
|title= Vitter can use some campaign funds for legal fees
|title=Vitter can use some campaign funds for legal fees
|publisher= [[Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[Associated Press]]
|accessdate= 2008-08-24
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-08-22
|date=2008-08-22
|last= Alpert
|last=Alpert
|first= Bruce
|first=Bruce
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base//news-0/121938309047030.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base//news-0/121938309047030.xml&coll=1
|title=FEC split in Vitter's push for legal fees - Bills top $200,000 in D.C. Madam case
|title=FEC split in Vitter's push for legal fees - Bills top $200,000 in D.C. Madam case
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-08-24
|accessdate=2008-08-24
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 1,054: Line 1,054:
On [[July 10]], [[2007]], Jeanette Maier, the "Canal Street Madam", alleged that Vitter was a customer on more than one occasion in the 1990s, when Maier was identified by federal prosecutors as operating a $300 per hour brothel.<ref>{{cite web
On [[July 10]], [[2007]], Jeanette Maier, the "Canal Street Madam", alleged that Vitter was a customer on more than one occasion in the 1990s, when Maier was identified by federal prosecutors as operating a $300 per hour brothel.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author=
|author=
|url= http://www.wdsu.com/news/13657113/detail.html
|url=http://www.wdsu.com/news/13657113/detail.html
|title= Canal Street Madam Says Vitter Was Client
|title=Canal Street Madam Says Vitter Was Client
|publisher= [[WDSU]]
|publisher=[[WDSU]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that "Maier offered no evidence or documents to support her claim."<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> ''[[The Times-Picayune]]'' reported that "Maier offered no evidence or documents to support her claim."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author= Moran, Kate and Carr, Martha
|author=Moran, Kate and Carr, Martha
|url= http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/madam_vitter_a_client_at_canal.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/madam_vitter_a_client_at_canal.html
|title= Madam: Vitter a client at Canal Street brothel
|title=Madam: Vitter a client at Canal Street brothel
|publisher= [[Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> Maier said that Vitter "was not a freak. He was not into anything unusual or kinky or weird," and that he favored one prostitute in particular, Wendy Cortez,<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-10}}</ref> Maier said that Vitter "was not a freak. He was not into anything unusual or kinky or weird," and that he favored one prostitute in particular, Wendy Cortez,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 10]], [[2007]]
|author= Moran, Kate
|author=Moran, Kate
|url= http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/no_madam_ids_vitter_as_client.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/no_madam_ids_vitter_as_client.html
|title= Former madam says Vitter was a client at Canal Street brothel
|title=Former madam says Vitter was a client at Canal Street brothel
|publisher= [[Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|author= Alpert, Bruce
|author=Alpert, Bruce
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/1184227544207940.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/1184227544207940.xml&coll=1
|title= Legal trouble unlikely for Vitter
|title=Legal trouble unlikely for Vitter
|publisher= [[Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 12]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-vitter12jul12,1,7600239.story?coll=la-news-a_section&ctrack=2&cset=true
|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-vitter12jul12,1,7600239.story?coll=la-news-a_section&ctrack=2&cset=true
|title= Madam links Sen. Vitter to brothel
|title=Madam links Sen. Vitter to brothel
|publisher= [[LA Times]]
|publisher=[[LA Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author= Burdeau, Cain
|author=Burdeau, Cain
|url= http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS01/707110347/1060/NEWS01
|url=http://www.shreveporttimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS01/707110347/1060/NEWS01
|title= Vitter was client of a New Orleans brothel, madam claims
|title=Vitter was client of a New Orleans brothel, madam claims
|publisher= [[The Shreveport Times]]
|publisher=[[The Shreveport Times]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> the name of the prostitute with whom Vitter had been accused, during his 2004 campaign, of having had a lengthy affair. Vitter denied that allegation during the campaign.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> the name of the prostitute with whom Vitter had been accused, during his 2004 campaign, of having had a lengthy affair. Vitter denied that allegation during the campaign.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[March 29]], [[2004]]
|date=[[March 29]], [[2004]]
|author= Tidmore, Christopher
|author=Tidmore, Christopher
|url= http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m
|url=http://www.louisianaweekly.com/weekly/news/articlegate.pl?20040329m
|title= Congressman Denies Affair With Prostitute
|title=Congressman Denies Affair With Prostitute
|publisher= [[The Louisiana Weekly]]
|publisher=[[The Louisiana Weekly]]
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> On July 12, Cortez told the ''Times-Picayune'' that Vitter was "a regular customer" during his time in the state legislature, but that they "did not have a romantic relationship."
|accessdate=2007-07-12}}</ref> On July 12, Cortez told the ''Times-Picayune'' that Vitter was "a regular customer" during his time in the state legislature, but that they "did not have a romantic relationship."
<ref>{{cite web
<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|author= Moran, Kate
|author=Moran, Kate
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/118430971563640.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-8/118430971563640.xml&coll=1
|title= Prostitute describes Vitter affair
|title=Prostitute describes Vitter affair
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> On September 12, 2007, ''The Times-Picayune'' reported that the woman, whose real name was Wendy Ellis, had passed a [[polygraph|lie detector]] exam.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-13}}</ref> On September 12, 2007, ''The Times-Picayune'' reported that the woman, whose real name was Wendy Ellis, had passed a [[polygraph|lie detector]] exam.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 12]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 12]], [[2007]]
|author= Moran, Kate
|author=Moran, Kate
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1189602069117880.xml&coll=1
|url=http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-9/1189602069117880.xml&coll=1
|title= Ex-call girl, Flynt keep pressure on Vitter
|title=Ex-call girl, Flynt keep pressure on Vitter
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>


Line 1,111: Line 1,111:
While the Louisiana state [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] offered guarded support,<ref>{{cite web
While the Louisiana state [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] offered guarded support,<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 13]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/louisiana_republicans_offer_gu.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/updates/2007/07/louisiana_republicans_offer_gu.html
|title= Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter
|title=Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter
|publisher= [[Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> national Republicans offered forgiveness.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> national Republicans offered forgiveness.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 19]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 19]], [[2007]]
|author= Radelat, Ana
|author=Radelat, Ana
|url= http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2007707180306
|title= Vitter tries to move forward
|title=Vitter tries to move forward
|publisher= [[Gannett News Service]]
|publisher=[[Gannett News Service]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> The liberal magazine the [[The Nation|''Nation'']] predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood" pointing out if Vitter did step down, then governor of Louisiana, [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[Kathleen Blanco]] would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election took place, thus increasing Democratic control over the Senate.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref> The liberal magazine the [[The Nation|''Nation'']] predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood" pointing out if Vitter did step down, then governor of Louisiana, [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] [[Kathleen Blanco]] would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election took place, thus increasing Democratic control over the Senate.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 17]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 17]], [[2007]]
|author= Nichols, John
|author=Nichols, John
|url= http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/1212761
|url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/1212761
|title= A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP
|title=A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP
|publisher= [[The Nation]]
|publisher=[[The Nation]]
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-22}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|author= Lipman, Larry
|author=Lipman, Larry
|url= http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/nation/epaper/2007/09/30/m1a_FOLEYnew_0930.html
|url=http://www.palmbeachpost.com/politics/content/nation/epaper/2007/09/30/m1a_FOLEYnew_0930.html
|title= A year later, Foley fallout lingers
|title=A year later, Foley fallout lingers
|publisher= [[Palm Beach Post]]
|publisher=[[Palm Beach Post]]
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 30]], [[2007]]
|author= Blumner, Robyn
|author=Blumner, Robyn
|url= http://www.sptimes.com/2007/09/30/Opinion/Republicans_and_their.shtml
|url=http://www.sptimes.com/2007/09/30/Opinion/Republicans_and_their.shtml
|title= Republicans and their big Greenspan gap
|title=Republicans and their big Greenspan gap
|publisher= [[St. Petersburg Times]]
|publisher=[[St. Petersburg Times]]
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref> [[Margaret Carlson]] of [[Bloomberg Television|Bloomberg News]] agreed, saying that since there is a Democratic governor in [[Louisiana]], "they were afraid if they slapped around Vitter too much, that seat would go Democratic."<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-09-30}}</ref> [[Margaret Carlson]] of [[Bloomberg Television|Bloomberg News]] agreed, saying that since there is a Democratic governor in [[Louisiana]], "they were afraid if they slapped around Vitter too much, that seat would go Democratic."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 7]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 7]], [[2007]]
|author= Kuraitis, Jill
|author=Kuraitis, Jill
|url= http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/novak_senate_rs_knew_craig_had_this_problem/C37/L37/
|url=http://www.newwest.net/topic/article/novak_senate_rs_knew_craig_had_this_problem/C37/L37/
|title= Novak: Senate R’s Knew Craig 'Had This Problem'
|title=Novak: Senate R’s Knew Craig 'Had This Problem'
|publisher= New West
|publisher=New West
|accessdate=2007-10-08}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-08}}</ref>


Marianne Means, a [[syndicated columnist]] for [[Hearst Corporation|Hearst Newspapers]], reported that Republican senators gave Vitter a "loud standing ovation" which she characterized as hypocritical by contrasting this with the Republican attitude toward President Clinton's marital infidelity.<ref>{{cite web
Marianne Means, a [[syndicated columnist]] for [[Hearst Corporation|Hearst Newspapers]], reported that Republican senators gave Vitter a "loud standing ovation" which she characterized as hypocritical by contrasting this with the Republican attitude toward President Clinton's marital infidelity.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|author= Means, Marianne
|author=Means, Marianne
|url= http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/OPINION/707230311
|url=http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070723/OPINION/707230311
|title= Republicans celebrate hypocrisy
|title=Republicans celebrate hypocrisy
|publisher= [[Times Herald-Record]]
|publisher=[[Times Herald-Record]]
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref> The applause came after Vitter privately apologized to his colleagues.<ref name="TP092907" />
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref> The applause came after Vitter privately apologized to his colleagues.<ref name="TP092907" />


Republican Senator [[Sam Brownback]] told [[Bloomberg Television]] on [[October 5]], [[2007]] that Vitter should be [[censure]]d by the Senate. He said, "I think you could see something like that taking place. If you look at the actual crime itself and the discussion across the country and as a Republican this is bad."<ref>{{cite web
Republican Senator [[Sam Brownback]] told [[Bloomberg Television]] on [[October 5]], [[2007]] that Vitter should be [[censure]]d by the Senate. He said, "I think you could see something like that taking place. If you look at the actual crime itself and the discussion across the country{{ndash}} and as a Republican{{ndash}} this is bad."<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[October 5]], [[2007]]
|date=[[October 5]], [[2007]]
|author= Goldman, Julianna
|author=Goldman, Julianna
|url= http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a1eg59WEkBL4&refer=us
|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a1eg59WEkBL4&refer=us
|title= Craig Faces U.S. Senate Censure, Not Expulsion, Brownback Says
|title=Craig Faces U.S. Senate Censure, Not Expulsion, Brownback Says
|publisher= [[Bloomberg Television]]
|publisher=[[Bloomberg Television]]
|accessdate=2007-10-06}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-10-06}}</ref>


In July 2007, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that the Vitter's chairmanship of [[Rudy Giuliani]]'s presidential bid was in doubt due to the controversy<ref name="NYT071107" /> but his job was ultimately secure<ref>{{cite web
In July 2007, ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported that the Vitter's chairmanship of [[Rudy Giuliani]]'s presidential bid was in doubt due to the controversy<ref name="NYT071107" /> but his job was ultimately secure<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 11]], [[2007]]
|author= Radelat, Ana
|author=Radelat, Ana
|url= http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS09/70711038
|url=http://www.jconline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070711/NEWS09/70711038
|title= Flynt says New Orleans prostitutes told on senator
|title=Flynt says New Orleans prostitutes told on senator
|publisher= [[Gannett News Service]]
|publisher=[[Gannett News Service]]
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> though "quietly marginalized".<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-11}}</ref> though "quietly marginalized".<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|date=[[July 23]], [[2007]]
|author= Crouere, Jeff
|author=Crouere, Jeff
|url= http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=19667
|url=http://www.neworleanscitybusiness.com/viewStory.cfm?recID=19667
|title= Sex scandal dissipates Vitter’s political power
|title=Sex scandal dissipates Vitter’s political power
|publisher= New Orleans City Business
|publisher=New Orleans City Business
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref><ref name="TP092907">{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-07-23}}</ref><ref name="TP092907">{{cite web
|date=[[September 29]], [[2007]]
|date=[[September 29]], [[2007]]
|author= Walsh, Bill
|author=Walsh, Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/louisiana_looks_like_a_state_o.html
|url=http://www.nola.com/elections/index.ssf/2007/09/louisiana_looks_like_a_state_o.html
|title= Louisiana looks like a state of denial
|title=Louisiana looks like a state of denial
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-09-29}}</ref>


In December, 2007, an [[editorial]] in ''[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]'' of [[Baton Rouge, Louisiana]] claimed that Vitter had lost influence due to the controversy.<ref>{{cite web
In December, 2007, an [[editorial]] in ''[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]'' of [[Baton Rouge, Louisiana]] claimed that Vitter had lost influence due to the controversy.<ref>{{cite web
|date=[[December 15]], [[2007]]
|date=[[December 15]], [[2007]]
|url= http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/12525621.html
|url=http://www.2theadvocate.com/opinion/12525621.html
|title= Our Views: Delegation suffers loss
|title=Our Views: Delegation suffers loss
|publisher= [[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]
|publisher=[[The Advocate (Baton Rouge)|The Advocate]]
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref> In the same month, ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine listed the controversy as one of the top ten awkward moments of 2007.<ref>{{cite web
|accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref> In the same month, ''[[Time (magazine)|Time]]'' magazine listed the controversy as one of the top ten awkward moments of 2007.<ref>{{cite web
|date=December, 2007
|date=December, 2007
|author= Salamme, Elisabeth
|author=Salamme, Elisabeth
|url= http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/top10/article/0,30583,1686204_1686303_1690302,00.html
|url=http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/top10/article/0,30583,1686204_1686303_1690302,00.html
|title= Top 10 Awkward Moments
|title=Top 10 Awkward Moments
|publisher= [[Time Magazine]]
|publisher=[[Time Magazine]]
|accessdate=2007-12-17}}</ref>
|accessdate=2007-12-17}}</ref>


In a similar vein when the [[Eliott Spitzer prostitution scandal]], then governor of New York, hit the headlines, commentators contrasted the end-results: Spitzer resigned while Vitter stayed on.<ref>{{cite web
In a similar vein when the [[Eliott Spitzer prostitution scandal]], then governor of New York, hit the headlines, commentators contrasted the end-results: Spitzer resigned while Vitter stayed on.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-18
|date=2008-03-18
|last= Kurtz
|last=Kurtz
|first= Howard
|first=Howard
|authorlink= Howard Kurtz
|authorlink=Howard Kurtz
|url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/03/14/DI2008031402992.html
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/03/14/DI2008031402992.html
|title= Media Backtalk
|title=Media Backtalk
|publisher= [[The Washington Post]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-19
|date=2008-03-19
|last= Akers
|last=Akers
|first= Mary Ann
|first=Mary Ann
|authorlink= Mary Ann Akers
|authorlink=Mary Ann Akers
|url= http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/03/sen_david_vitter_on_prostituti.html
|url=http://blog.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/03/sen_david_vitter_on_prostituti.html
|title= Sen. Vitter Resents Comparisons with Ex-Gov. Spitzer
|title=Sen. Vitter Resents Comparisons with Ex-Gov. Spitzer
|publisher= [[The Washington Post]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-21
|date=2008-04-21
|last= Bleifuss
|last=Bleifuss
|first= Joel
|first=Joel
|authorlink= Joel Bleifuss
|authorlink=Joel Bleifuss
|url= http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3600/political_vice_squad/
|url=http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/3600/political_vice_squad/
|title= Political Vice Squad
|title=Political Vice Squad
|publisher= [[In These Times]]
|publisher=[[In These Times]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> In response, [[Jeff Crouere]], a New Orleans [[conservativism|conservative]] [[political commentator]], called on Vitter to resign saying he was an ineffective representative and reflected poorly on the state.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> In response, [[Jeff Crouere]], a New Orleans [[conservativism|conservative]] [[political commentator]], called on Vitter to resign saying he was an ineffective representative and reflected poorly on the state.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-14
|date=2008-03-14
|last= Crouere
|last=Crouere
|first= Jeff
|first=Jeff
|authorlink= Jeff Crouere
|authorlink=Jeff Crouere
|url= http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2008/03/spitzer_sex_scandal_reminds_na.html
|url=http://blog.nola.com/jeff_crouere/2008/03/spitzer_sex_scandal_reminds_na.html
|title= Spitzer Sex Scandal Reminds Nation of Vitter's Sins
|title=Spitzer Sex Scandal Reminds Nation of Vitter's Sins
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> Other local political figures differed with Crouere. Democratic [[political consultant]] [[James Carville]] said the two cases were entirely different: Spitzer's situation developed from an active investigation and as a former prosecutor and governor he had powerful enemies. In contrast, Carville described Vitter as "Louisiana’s junior senator and nobody really knows him or cares that much about him," but concluded that, "if they paid with their own money, I don’t think either one should resign." The Louisiana Republican governor [[Bobby Jindal]] said, "Senator Vitter has already addressed this.... The people of New York can deal with the Governor of New York.”<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> Other local political figures differed with Crouere. Democratic [[political consultant]] [[James Carville]] said the two cases were entirely different: Spitzer's situation developed from an active investigation and as a former prosecutor and governor he had powerful enemies. In contrast, Carville described Vitter as "Louisiana’s junior senator and nobody really knows him or cares that much about him," but concluded that, "if they paid with their own money, I don’t think either one should resign." The Louisiana Republican governor [[Bobby Jindal]] said, "Senator Vitter has already addressed this.... The people of New York can deal with the Governor of New York.”<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-03-14
|date=2008-03-14
|url= http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/NEWS01/80311017/1002
|url=http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080311/NEWS01/80311017/1002
|title= Spitzer, Vitter spark different reactions to scandal accusations
|title=Spitzer, Vitter spark different reactions to scandal accusations
|publisher= [[The Associated Press]]
|publisher=[[The Associated Press]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
}}</ref> Additionally, one gauge of the scandal's impact, local fundraising, indicated that Vitter has weathered the controversy well: first quarter 2008 finance reports show that he made, according to ''The Times-Picayune'', an "impressive haul".<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> Additionally, one gauge of the scandal's impact, local fundraising, indicated that Vitter has weathered the controversy well: first quarter 2008 finance reports show that he made, according to ''The Times-Picayune'', an "impressive haul".<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-04-23
|date=2008-04-23
|last= Walsh
|last=Walsh
|first= Bill
|first=Bill
|url= http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/04/kennedy_senate_run_gets_financ.html
|url=http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2008/04/kennedy_senate_run_gets_financ.html
|title= Kennedy Senate run gets financial push
|title=Kennedy Senate run gets financial push
|publisher= [[The Times-Picayune]]
|publisher=[[The Times-Picayune]]
|accessdate = 2008-04-26
|accessdate=2008-04-26
|quote= Vitter's impressive haul suggests that despite his involvement in the "D.C. Madam" scandal as one-time client of the escort service, his political support remains strong among rank-and-file Republicans in Louisiana.
|quote=Vitter's impressive haul suggests that despite his involvement in the "D.C. Madam" scandal as one-time client of the escort service, his political support remains strong among rank-and-file Republicans in Louisiana.
}}</ref> Another gauge, voter approval, indicates Vitter is, [[as of June 2008]], still popular with Louisiana voters.<ref>{{cite web
}}</ref> Another gauge, voter approval, indicates Vitter is, [[as of June 2008]], still popular with Louisiana voters.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-07-01
|date=2008-07-01
|last= Wilson
|last=Wilson
|first= Reid
|first=Reid
|url= http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/la_race_tightens.html
|url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/politics_nation/2008/07/la_race_tightens.html
|title= LA Race Tightens
|title=LA Race Tightens
|publisher= [[Real Clear Politics]]
|publisher=[[Real Clear Politics]]
|accessdate= 2008-07-01
|accessdate=2008-07-01
|quote= Given Vitter's recent troubles, one might expect a low favorable rating. Instead, the junior senator is seen positively by 55% of voters in Louisiana, compared with just 38% who view him unfavorably.
|quote=Given Vitter's recent troubles, one might expect a low favorable rating. Instead, the junior senator is seen positively by 55% of voters in Louisiana, compared with just 38% who view him unfavorably.
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Vitter once again received unwanted attention after the suicide of Palfrey in May 2008.<ref>{{cite web
Vitter once again received unwanted attention after the suicide of Palfrey in May 2008.<ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-02
|date=2008-05-02
|last= Hesse
|last=Hesse
|first= Monica
|first=Monica
|page = C01
|page=C01
|url= http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103763.html?hpid=topnews
|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/01/AR2008050103763.html?hpid=topnews
|title= The Scandal Story With a Most Unhappy Ending
|title=The Scandal Story With a Most Unhappy Ending
|publisher= [[The Washington Post]]
|publisher=[[The Washington Post]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-02
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-02
|date=2008-05-02
|last= Sauer
|last=Sauer
|first= Maddy
|first=Maddy
|url= http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4768815&page=1
|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4768815&page=1
|title= Madams Fall While Their Johns Prosper
|title=Madams Fall While Their Johns Prosper
|publisher= [[ABC News]]
|publisher=[[ABC News]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-02
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
}}</ref><ref>{{cite web
|date= 2008-05-01
|date=2008-05-01
|last= Zagorin
|last=Zagorin
|first= Adam
|first=Adam
|url= http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1736687,00.html?imw=Y
|url=http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1736687,00.html?imw=Y
|title= D.C. Madam: Suicide Before Prison
|title=D.C. Madam: Suicide Before Prison
|publisher= [[Time (magazine)|Time]]
|publisher=[[Time (magazine)|Time]]
|accessdate = 2008-05-02
|accessdate=2008-05-02
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 1,323: Line 1,323:
{{CongLinks | congbio = v000127 | fec = S4LA00057 | opensecrets = N00009659 | votesmart = BS022639 | ontheissuespath = Senate/David_Vitter.htm }}
{{CongLinks | congbio = v000127 | fec = S4LA00057 | opensecrets = N00009659 | votesmart = BS022639 | ontheissuespath = Senate/David_Vitter.htm }}
*[http://vitter.org/ Vitter.org - website of the Vitter family] Maintained by David Vitter's brother [[Jeffrey Vitter]]
*[http://vitter.org/ Vitter.org - website of the Vitter family] Maintained by David Vitter's brother [[Jeffrey Vitter]]
*[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Vitter SourceWatch Congresspedia David Vitter] profile
*[http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=David_Vitter SourceWatch Congresspedia{{ndash}} David Vitter] profile


{{s-start}}
{{s-start}}
{{s-par|us-hs}}
{{s-par|us-hs}}
{{USRepSuccessionBox
{{USRepSuccessionBox
| state=Louisiana
|state=Louisiana
| district=1
|district=1
| before=[[Bob Livingston]]
|before=[[Bob Livingston]]
| years=1999 – 2005
|years=1999 – 2005
| after=[[Bobby Jindal]]}}
|after=[[Bobby Jindal]]}}
{{s-par|us-sen}}
{{s-par|us-sen}}
{{U.S. Senator box
{{U.S. Senator box
| before=[[John Breaux]]
|before=[[John Breaux]]
| state=Louisiana
|state=Louisiana
| class=3
|class=3
| start=2005
|start=2005
| alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]}}
|alongside=[[Mary Landrieu]]}}
{{s-prec|usa}}
{{s-prec|usa}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Johnny Isakson]]<br><small>R-[[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Johnny Isakson]]<br><small>R-[[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]]}}
Line 1,348: Line 1,348:
{{LA-FedRep}}
{{LA-FedRep}}
{{Current U.S. Senators}}
{{Current U.S. Senators}}
{{Current statewide political officials of Louisiana}}
{{LAStatewideOfficials}}
<!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]] -->
<!-- Metadata: see [[Wikipedia:Persondata]] -->



Revision as of 11:21, 11 October 2008

David Vitter
United States Senator
from Louisiana
Assumed office
January 3, 2005
Serving with Mary Landrieu
Preceded byJohn B. Breaux
Succeeded byIncumbent (2011)
Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Louisiana's 1st district
In office
May 29, 1999January 3, 2005
Preceded byBob Livingston
Succeeded byBobby Jindal
Member of the Louisiana House of Representatives
from the 81 district
In office
1992–1999
Preceded byDavid Duke
Succeeded byJennifer Sneed
Personal details
Political partyRepublican
SpouseWendy Baldwin Vitter
ChildrenSophie Vitter
Lise Vitter
Airey Vitter
Jack Vitter
ResidenceMetairie, Louisiana
Alma materHarvard University; Oxford University; Tulane Law School
Occupationattorney

David Bruce Vitter (born May 3, 1961) is the junior United States Senator from Louisiana and a member of the Republican Party. Formerly a member of the United States House of Representatives, first elected in 1999, representing the suburban Louisiana's 1st congressional district, Vitter was elected to the Senate in 2004.

Vitter was born and raised in New Orleans. He attended Harvard University for his undergraduate studies and Tulane University for law school in addition to winning a Rhodes Scholarship to University College, Oxford. He served as a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives before entering the U.S. House.

Vitter is a staunch supporter of conservative political views. His legislative agenda includes positions ranging from pro-life to pro-gun rights while legislating against gambling, same-sex marriage, funding for abortion providers, increases in the State Children's Health Insurance Program, the United Nations, and amnesty for America's undocumented workers.

Vitter's stated positions include a balanced budget constitutional amendment,[1] abolishing the federal and state estate tax,[2] increasing local police forces,[3] and an assortment of health care, tax and national defense reforms.[4]

In the aftermath of the disastrous Hurricane Katrina, Vitter worked with the Louisiana congressional delegation to bring disaster relief to the region for rebuilding and aiding the victims disagreeing primarily over the issue of public housing.

In July 2007, Vitter was identified as a client of "D.C. Madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey's prostitution service in Washington, D.C.[5]

Early life, career, and family

Vitter was born in New Orleans to Audrey Malvina St. Raymond and Albert Leopold Vitter.[6] He received a B.A. from Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1983; a B.A. from Oxford University in 1985, as a Rhodes Scholar; and a Juris Doctor from the Tulane University Law School in New Orleans in 1988. He was a lawyer and a member of the Louisiana House of Representatives from 1992 to 1999, when he entered the U.S. House.

Vitter and his wife Wendy, a former prosecutor,[7] have three daughters, Sophie, Lise, and Airey, and a son, Jack. Vitter's brother Jeffrey Vitter is a notable academic, the provost of Texas A&M University.

House of Representatives

Elections

Vitter won a special election to Louisiana's 1st Congressional District in 1999, succeeding Republican Congressman Bob Livingston, who resigned after an adultery scandal. In the initial vote on May 1, 1999,[8] former Congressman and Governor David Treen finished first with 36,719 votes (25 percent). Vitter was second, with 31,741 (22 percent), and self-styled "white nationalist" David Duke finished third with 28,055 votes (19 percent). Monica L. Monica, a Republican ophthalmologist, had 16 percent; State Representative Bill Strain, a conservative Democrat, finished fifth with 11 percent; and Rob Couhig, a Republican lawyer and the owner of New Orleans's minor league baseball team, had 6 percent.[9] In the special election runoff on May 29, Vitter defeated Treen, 61,661 votes (51 percent) to 59,849 (49 percent).[10]

In 2000 and 2002, Vitter won re-election with over 80 percent of the vote in what has become a safe Republican district.[10]

2002 gubernatorial race

In 2002, Vitter was preparing to run for governor in 2003, with the incumbent, Republican Mike Foster prevented by term limits from running again. But in June 2002, shortly before the Louisiana Weekly ran a story about Vitter's alleged relationship with a prostitute, Vitter dropped out of the governor's race,[11] saying he and his wife were dealing with marital problems.[12]

United States Senate

2004 election

In 2004, Vitter ran to replace Democrat John Breaux in the U.S. Senate. Former state Senator Daniel Wesley Richey, a Baton Rouge political consultant, directed Vitter's grassroots organization in the race, with assistance from Richey's longtime ally, former state Representative Louis E. "Woody" Jenkins of Baton Rouge, himself a defeated U.S. Senate candidate in 1978, 1980, and 1996.

During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy affair with a prostitute in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was "absolutely and completely untrue" and that it was "just crass Louisiana politics."[7]

On November 2, 2004, Vitter won the Louisiana senatorial jungle primary with 51.0 percent of the vote. The field of opponents including two major Democrats, then Seventh Congressional District Congressman Christopher John, who got 29.4 percent of the vote, and state Treasurer John N. Kennedy (no relation to the Massachusetts Kennedys), who got 15.1 percent.

Vitter was the first Republican in Louisiana to be popularly elected as a U.S. Senator. The previous Republican Senator, William Pitt Kellogg, was chosen by the state legislature in 1876, in accordance with the process used before the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution went into effect in 1914.[13]

Committees

Political actions and positions

Illegal immigration

Vitter has been actively involved with legislation concerning illegal immigrants. In June 2007, he led a group of conservative Senators in blocking the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 that would have granted legal status to 12 million undocumented workers coupled with increased border enforcement. The bill's defeat won Vitter national attention as it was supported by President George W. Bush, John McCain, and Ted Kennedy, among others. Vitter characterized the bill as amnesty which supporters denied. Bush accused the bill's opponents of fear mongering.[14][15][16]

In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment withholding Community Oriented Policing Services funds from any sanctuary city which bans city employees and police officers from asking people about their immigration status in violation of the Illegal Immigration Act. Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, in opposition to the amendment, said these cities do not want to inquire about someone's status if they report a crime, are a victim of domestic violence or get vaccinations for their children. According to Fox News, one senator remarked that the amendment would withhold funds for prostitution enforcement which was a problem for Vitter because of the D.C. Madam controversy. The amendment failed to pass.[17]

In November 2007, Vitter introduced a bill requiring banks to confirm that customers were not illegal immigrants before providing them with banking or credit cards. As of May 2008, no action is planned for the bill.[18][19]

In March 2008, Vitter reintroduced the latter two proposals[20][21] and cosponsored ten of eleven other bills[22] in a Republican package of tough immigration enforcement measures including jail time for illegal border crossing, deportation for any immigrant (legal or illegal) for a single driving while intoxicated, declaration of English as the official language (thereby terminating language assistance at voting booths and federal agencies), additional construction of a border fence, permission for local and state police to enforce immigration laws and penalties for states who issue drivers licenses to illegals. This package has little chance of being debated because the Democratic-controlled Senate prefers a comprehensive approach which would include a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for the current population more akin to the package defeated by Vitter in 2007.[23]

In April 2008, Vitter introduced a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment that a child born in the United States is not a citizen unless a parent is a citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien serving in the military.[24] Currently the Constitution grants citizenship to children born within the U.S. regardless of the legal status of the parents.[25] As of May 2008, the resolution has no cosponsors.

Gulf Coast recovery

Hurricane Katrina

In the aftermath of the disastrous Hurricane Katrina that devastated New Orleans in 2005, Vitter along with the entire Louisiana congressional delegation worked to bring aid to the Gulf Coast region to rebuild broken levees, schools and hospitals, restore coastal wetlands, and provide assistance for its many victims.[26]

In early September, Vitter said that he would give "the entire big government organized relief effort a failing grade, across the board." He said that state and local governments shared in the blame as well.[27] Vitter's actions during Hurricane Katrina are described in historian Douglas Brinkley's May 2006 book, The Great Deluge.

In September 2007, Vitter announced that he got "a critical concession" from the White House that decreased Louisiana's obligations for hurricane recovery by $1 billion. However, the White House said that was false.[28]

Federal Water Bill

Vitter helped write the Water Resources and Development Act for flood-control, hurricane-protection and coastal-restoration projects including $3.6 billion for Louisiana. He called it the "single most important" legislation for assisting Louisiana with its recovery from hurricane Katrina. President Bush vetoed the act, objecting to its cost.[29][30][31] Congress overrode his veto, enacting the bill.[32]

New Orleans public housing

In September 2007, The Times-Picayune reported that Vitter and the Bush administration opposed a provision of The Gulf Coast Housing Recovery bill which required that every public housing apartment torn down be replaced with another form of low-income housing on a one-for-one basis. The administration testified that there was not sufficient demand for public housing units, a position contested by several senators. Vitter stated it would recreate "housing projects exactly as they were", isolated and riddled with crime. However, Mary Landrieu, the Louisiana Democratic Senator, said the intent was to make certain there were affordable places for working class people who returned. The bill requires that demolished housing projects be replaced with mixed income communities which local housing advocates say is different from the massive public housing developments that Vitter is referring to. However, the bill does not include a ban on large-scale projects.[33][34] The city housing authority is planning on replacing 4,000 low-income units with mixed-income projects providing a smaller inventory of low-income units.[35] In November, 2007, more than two dozen political action, faith-based and human rights organizations delivered a petition with more than 130,000 signatures asking that Vitter reconsider his position.[36] In December 2007, Vitter killed the bill in committee.[34] Some housing advocates charge that Vitter is stalling the bill in order to keep Landrieu from claiming a legislative victory one year in advance of her reelection, a charge Vitter denies, saying Landrieu was refusing to negotiate.[37][38]

Pro-life stance

Vitter has won praise from pro-life groups for his stance against abortion.[39] In 2001, he co-authored legislation to restrict the number of physicians allowed to prescribe RU-486, a drug used in medical abortions. Vitter said, "The legislation is about protecting women's health" and criticized the FDA for "hurriedly" approving the drug. Several Democratic politicians and pro-choice groups condemned the bill, characterizing Vitter as an "antichoice extremist". The bill died in committee.[40][41]

In October 2007, Vitter introduced an amendment[42] barring all funds to health care providers and Planned Parenthood that provide health services (such as contraceptives, Pap smears, breast exams and tests for STDs) in addition to abortions. Federal law bars any funding to directly finance abortions. Vitter argued that the funds are used for overhead costs that benefit the abortion services. The amendment failed to pass.[43][44] Following the rejection, Vitter and others urged the Senate to pass a similar bill introduced by Vitter in January 2007. As of May 2008, the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.[45][46]

In January 2008, Vitter proposed an amendment to prohibit the funding of abortions with Indian Health Service funds except in the case of rape, incest, or the life of the mother is at risk.[47][48] Vitter's amendment passed the Senate. If enacted into law, it will hold future presidential administrations to an executive principle first crafted in 1982 by the Ronald Reagan White House.[49]

Later that year, Vitter co-sponsored the Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act which required doctors performing abortions to have the authority granted by a nearby hospital to admit patients along with other oversight regulations. As of May 2008, the bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.[50][51]

Gun politics

Rated A by the National Rifle Association, Vitter has been a consistent champion of gun rights.[52] In April, 2006, in response to firearm confiscations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Vitter was the Senate sponsor of the Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act, to prohibit federal funding for the confiscation of legally held firearms during a disaster.[53] Later, Vitter included the provisions of the act in an amendment to an appropriation bill for the Department Of Homeland Security.[54] The bill became law in September, 2006 with the amendment modified to allow for the temporary surrender of a firearm as a condition for entering a rescue or evacuation vehicle.[55]

In February 2008, Vitter, along with Senators Larry Craig and Mike Crapo, blocked the confirmation of Michael J. Sullivan as head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives saying Sullivan supports "burdensome regulations" on gun owners and dealers and is "overly aggressive" enforcing gun laws. An editorial writer for The Boston Globe wrote that Vitter's position was "unreasonable" because the guns Sullivan sought to control are those commonly used in crimes: those stolen or purchased on the black market.[56][57] On the other hand, gun rights advocates say that many gun dealers have lost their licenses for harmless bureaucratic errors.[58]

Ethics reform and term limits

Vitter has argued for ethics reform and term limits since he was in the Louisiana Legislature in the early 1990s.[59] As a Louisiana state legislator, Vitter successfully pushed through a term limits amendment to the state constitution to oust the largely Democratically controlled legislature.[60][61][62][63] The first election legislators were affected by the reform occurred in 2007.[64] In order to leverage the term limits advantage in that election, Vitter formed a Political Action Committee with the goal of winning a legislative Republican majority. Although it was well financed, Vitter's connection with prostitution may have decreased its effectiveness.[65][66] While the Republicans saw gains, the Democrats maintained majority control.[63]

In spite of his state legislative efforts, Vitter refused to pledge to a voluntary term limit when running for the U.S. Congress in 1999 which his opponent characterized as hypocritical. Vitter countered that unless it was universally applied, the loss of seniority would disadvantage his district.[60][67] As a Senator, he has twice proposed term limit constitutional amendments for members of Congress.[68][69]

In 2007, in response to lobbying scandals involving, among others, Jack Abramoff and Duke Cunningham, Congress passed a lobbying and ethics reform package to which Vitter proposed a package of five amendments.[70][71][72][73] The Senate approved three that limited which legislators' spouses could lobby the Senate,[74] created criminal penalties for legislators and executive branch officials who falsify financial reports,[75] and doubled the penalties for lobbyists who failed to comply with disclosure requirements.[76] The Senate rejected prohibiting legislators from paying their families with campaign funds with some saying it was unrelated to the current legislation and others that the payments were not a problem.[77][78] Additionally, they tabled his proposal to define Indian tribes as corporations and its members as stockholders so that they are required to contribute to candidates through political action committees instead of their tribal treasury.[79] Senators objected saying that they are already subjected to campaign laws for unincorporated entities and individuals and that the proposal was singling them out unfairly.[78] The reform package became law in September 2007.[70]

Children's health insurance program

In September 2007, Vitter opposed an increase of $35 billion for the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), the national program to provide health care for children from families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but cannot afford private health insurance. He said he preferred that private health insurance provide the needed care and deemed the bill as "Hillarycare", a reference to the 1993 Clinton health care plan created by Hillary Clinton which proposed universal health care.[80] The increase passed the Senate, 67 to 29 but was later vetoed by President Bush.[81]

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea

In September 2007, during hearings of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Vitter expressed serious doubts about the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea treaty concerning issues of U.S. sovereignty[82] echoing an array of anti-UN conservative groups against the treaty[83][82] including The National Center for Public Policy Research,[84] the Heritage Foundation[85] and the Center for Security Policy.[86] The treaty, which sets up countries' jurisdiction over their coasts and ocean including exploration and navigation rights,[87] is supported by the Bush administration, a majority of the United States Senate, the Pentagon, the State Department and Navy[88] as do a coalition of business and environmental groups.[89] The committee approved the treaty 17-4, with Vitter voting no.[90]

Gambling

Ever since his days in the Louisiana State Legislature, Vitter has been a longtime foe of gambling.[91] Beginning in 2002, Vitter opposed the Indian group Jena Band's bid to build a casino in Louisiana arguing that the build site was not historically part of their tribal lands. He lobbied the Interior Department and included language in an appropriations bill to stop the casino. Although the Interior Department gave its approval, the casino has not yet been approved by the state.[92] The Jena chief accused Vitter of ties with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff who simultaneously lobbied against the casino. The chairman of the Senate committee investigating the lobbyist said, "The committee has seen absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Senator Vitter's opposition to (the proposed casino) had to do with anything other than his long-standing opposition to gambling.[93] In 2007 and 2008, Vitter introduced a bill to prohibit Indian casinos such as Jena's. As of May 2008, Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.[94][95][96]

Military

In May 2001, Vitter authored an amendment to the No Child Left Behind Act, a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which required all secondary schools receiving federal funding to permit US military recruitment on school grounds and to provide the name, home phone number and address of every student enrolled to military recruiters, unless the student (or the student's parent) specifically opts out.[97][98][99] In February, 2007, Democratic Representative Michael M. Honda proposed the Student Privacy Protection Act of 2007 to change Vitter's amendment from requiring high schools to provide military recruiters with students' personal information unless they explicitly opt-out to requiring the student's explicit consent first.[100][101] According to the Congressional Quarterly, Vitter stands behind the current provision. He stated, if changed, families who supported military recruiting may miss out if required to opt-in.[102]

In May 2008, Vitter voted with the majority, despite President Bush's and other conservative Republican's opposition, for the passage of the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 which expanded educational benefits for veterans similar to the level provided for returning World War II veterans in the G.I. Bill.[103][104][105]

School board prayers

In 2005 Vitter introduced a resolution supporting prayer at school board meetings in response to an earlier district court decision that the Louisiana's Tangipahoa Parish practice of opening meetings with Christian prayers was unconstitutional. The bill died in committee.[106][107] Vitter later reintroduced the resolution in January 2007 after a panel of the Fifth Circuit Court concluded that Christian prayers were unconstitutional but was undecided whether nonsectarian prayers were allowed. In July 2007, the full Fifth Circuit dismissed the case because of a lack of standing. The school board subsequently resumed prayer evocations but opened it to diverse community religions. As of May 2008, Vitter's bill has been referred to committee with no scheduled action.[108][107][109][110]

Abstinence education

Vitter advocated abstinence-only sex education, emphasizing abstinence while excluding issues involving birth control and safe sex.[111] He said, "Abstinence education is a public health strategy focused on risk avoidance that aims to help young people avoid exposure to harm...by teaching teenagers that saving sex until marriage and remaining faithful afterwards is the best choice for health and happiness."[112] According to Focus on the Family, Vitter was one of three conservative senators that convinced Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg to withdraw an amendment that would have restricted abstinence education to programs deemed to be "medically accurate".[113][114]

Same-sex marriage

Vitter professes that marriage is a sacred vow between a man and a woman. In 2003, Vitter proposed to amend the U.S. Constitution to ban same sex marriages.[115] In 2004, he said, "This is a real outrage. The Hollywood left is redefining the most basic institution in human history...We need a U.S. Senator who will stand up for Louisiana values, not Massachusetts’s values."[116] In June 2006, he said "I don't believe there's any issue that's more important than this one ... I think this debate is very healthy, and it's winning a lot of hearts and minds. I think we're going to show real progress."[117] In 2006, he told The Times-Picayune, “I’m a conservative who opposes radically redefining marriage, the most important social institution in human history.”[118]

In October 2005, at a Lafayette Parish Republican Executive Committee luncheon, Vitter compared gay marriage to hurricanes Katrina and Rita, which came through the same geographical areas. Vitter said "It's the crossroads where Katrina meets Rita. I always knew I was against same-sex unions."[119]

Louisiana Family Forum earmark

In September, 2007, Vitter earmarked $100,000 in federal money for a Christian group, the Louisiana Family Forum,[120] known for challenging evolution by means of "teaching the controversy" which promotes intelligent design while discrediting evolution.[121] According to Vitter, the earmark was "to develop a plan to promote better science education".[120] Though the Louisiana Family Forum is largely forbidden from political activity due to its non-profit status,[122] The Times-Picayune alleged the group had close ties with Vitter.[120] However, they have criticized Vitter for his support of Rudy Giuliani.[123]

On October 17, 2007, the liberal organization People For the American Way, along with several other groups asked the Senate to remove the earmark.[124][125] Vitter later withdrew it.[126][127]

Child protection

In April 2008, Vitter introduced an amendment to continue funding the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act which was excluded from the 2008/2009 budget. The federal program maintains a national sex offender registry, provides resources for tracking down unregistered offenders and increases penalties for the sexual assault of children. His amendment received bi-partisan support.[128][129]

Republican Party reputation

With concerns being raised about the Republican Party's prospects in the 2008 election, Vitter said, "[I]t's certainly true that national Republicans need to improve their brand. Perhaps folks should actually take some cues from Republicans in Louisiana. At home, we're the party of reform and positive changes versus failed past and the good ol' boys."[130]

Prostitution scandal

D.C. Madam

In early July 2007, Vitter's phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, also known as the "D.C. Madam", convicted by the U.S. government for running a prostitution service. Hustler magazine identified the phone number and contacted Vitter's office to ask about his connection to Palfrey.[131][132] The following day, Vitter issued a written statement:

This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible. Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling. Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there - with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.[133]

The statement containing Vitter's apology said his telephone number was included in phone records dating from his days as a member of the House of Representatives.[7] Phone records show that Vitter's number was called by Palfrey's service five times, the first on October 12, 1999, and the last on February 27, 2001.[134] Two calls were placed while House roll call votes were in progress.[135]

On July 16, 2007, after a week of self imposed seclusion, Vitter emerged and called a press conference. Standing next to his wife, Vitter asked the public for forgiveness. Following Vitter's remarks, Wendy Vitter, his wife, spoke. Both refused to answer any questions.[136][137][138]

As background, several news outlets reported that in May 1999, Vitter replaced Congressman Bob Livingston after Livingston resigned due to an adultery scandal.[5][139][118] Vitter said about Livingston's decision to resign, "It's obviously a tremendous loss for the state. I think Livingston's stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess", referring to the Monica Lewinsky scandal of President Bill Clinton.[140] In 2000, his wife, Wendy Vitter, commenting on the same scandal, said, "I'm a lot more like Lorena Bobbitt than Hillary. If he [Vitter] does something like that, I'm walking away with one thing, and it's not alimony, trust me," referring to the incident of Lorena Bobbitt severing the penis of her husband and to Clinton's wife, Hillary Clinton.[139]

Vitter is unlikely to face criminal charges due to the statute of limitations.[141] Vitter apologized to GOP senate colleagues but avoided the press who repeatedly attempted to talk to him.[142]

On November 13, 2007, the attorney for Palfrey served Vitter with a subpoena to force him to testify at a November 28, 2007 hearing about whether an act of prostitution occurred with a Palfrey escort and when.[143][144] The following week, the judge in the case canceled the hearing.[145] Palfrey's attorney indicated he planned to subpoena Vitter to testify at her 2008 criminal trial,[146] even though Vitter might have pled the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination[147] but in the end he wasn't called to testify.[148] Vitter refused to comment on the matter.[149]

After Senator Larry Craig was admonished by the Senate Ethics Committee for acting improperly after his arrest for lewd contact toward another man in an airport bathroom in February 2008, the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington questioned why the committee had not taken similar action against Vitter.[150] The committee later dismissed the complaint.[151]

Vitter incurred significant legal and public relations expenses in his efforts to avoid giving testimony in the Palfrey trial and to respond to the ethics complaint. Consequently, his attorneys sought permission from the Federal Election Commission to use campaign funds to pay for these expenses.[152][153] The Commission, along partisan lines, couldn't agree whether funds could be used for reimbursing costs related to the Palfrey trial but did allow them to pay for expenses connected to the Ethics Committee complaint.[154][155][156]

Canal Street Madam

On July 10, 2007, Jeanette Maier, the "Canal Street Madam", alleged that Vitter was a customer on more than one occasion in the 1990s, when Maier was identified by federal prosecutors as operating a $300 per hour brothel.[157] The Times-Picayune reported that "Maier offered no evidence or documents to support her claim."[158] Maier said that Vitter "was not a freak. He was not into anything unusual or kinky or weird," and that he favored one prostitute in particular, Wendy Cortez,[159][160][161][162] the name of the prostitute with whom Vitter had been accused, during his 2004 campaign, of having had a lengthy affair. Vitter denied that allegation during the campaign.[163] On July 12, Cortez told the Times-Picayune that Vitter was "a regular customer" during his time in the state legislature, but that they "did not have a romantic relationship." [164] On September 12, 2007, The Times-Picayune reported that the woman, whose real name was Wendy Ellis, had passed a lie detector exam.[165]

Reaction

While the Louisiana state Republican Party offered guarded support,[166] national Republicans offered forgiveness.[167] The liberal magazine the Nation predicted that the Republican Party would be in a "forgiving mood" pointing out if Vitter did step down, then governor of Louisiana, Democratic Kathleen Blanco would likely appoint a Democrat to take Vitter's place until a special election took place, thus increasing Democratic control over the Senate.[168][169][170] Margaret Carlson of Bloomberg News agreed, saying that since there is a Democratic governor in Louisiana, "they were afraid if they slapped around Vitter too much, that seat would go Democratic."[171]

Marianne Means, a syndicated columnist for Hearst Newspapers, reported that Republican senators gave Vitter a "loud standing ovation" which she characterized as hypocritical by contrasting this with the Republican attitude toward President Clinton's marital infidelity.[172] The applause came after Vitter privately apologized to his colleagues.[28]

Republican Senator Sam Brownback told Bloomberg Television on October 5, 2007 that Vitter should be censured by the Senate. He said, "I think you could see something like that taking place. If you look at the actual crime itself and the discussion across the country– and as a Republican– this is bad."[173]

In July 2007, The New York Times reported that the Vitter's chairmanship of Rudy Giuliani's presidential bid was in doubt due to the controversy[118] but his job was ultimately secure[174] though "quietly marginalized".[175][28]

In December, 2007, an editorial in The Advocate of Baton Rouge, Louisiana claimed that Vitter had lost influence due to the controversy.[176] In the same month, Time magazine listed the controversy as one of the top ten awkward moments of 2007.[177]

In a similar vein when the Eliott Spitzer prostitution scandal, then governor of New York, hit the headlines, commentators contrasted the end-results: Spitzer resigned while Vitter stayed on.[178][179][180] In response, Jeff Crouere, a New Orleans conservative political commentator, called on Vitter to resign saying he was an ineffective representative and reflected poorly on the state.[181] Other local political figures differed with Crouere. Democratic political consultant James Carville said the two cases were entirely different: Spitzer's situation developed from an active investigation and as a former prosecutor and governor he had powerful enemies. In contrast, Carville described Vitter as "Louisiana’s junior senator and nobody really knows him or cares that much about him," but concluded that, "if they paid with their own money, I don’t think either one should resign." The Louisiana Republican governor Bobby Jindal said, "Senator Vitter has already addressed this.... The people of New York can deal with the Governor of New York.”[182] Additionally, one gauge of the scandal's impact, local fundraising, indicated that Vitter has weathered the controversy well: first quarter 2008 finance reports show that he made, according to The Times-Picayune, an "impressive haul".[183] Another gauge, voter approval, indicates Vitter is, as of June 2008, still popular with Louisiana voters.[184]

Vitter once again received unwanted attention after the suicide of Palfrey in May 2008.[185][186][187]

Electoral history

2004 Louisiana United States Senatorial Election

David Vitter (R) 51%
Chris John (D) 29%
John N. Kennedy (D) 15%
Arthur Morrell (D) 3%
Richard Fontanesi (I) 1%
R.A. Galan (I) 1%
Sam Melton (D) 1%


1999 Louisiana 1st District United States Congressional Election

David Vitter (R) 51%
David C. Treen (R) 49%

Footnotes

  1. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Budget". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  2. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Agriculture & Seafood". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  3. ^ "David Vitter Issues: Crime and Drugs". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  4. ^ "David Vitter Issues". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  5. ^ a b "Hustler says it revealed senator's link to escort service". CNN. July 11, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-14. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ "David Bruce Vitter", GeneaNet.com, accessed July 10, 2007
  7. ^ a b c Shailagh Murray, "Senator's Number on 'Madam' Phone List", Washington Post, July 10, 2007
  8. ^ Stuart Rothenberg, "Hot race for Livingston's Louisiana House seat", CNN, April 13, 1999
  9. ^ Kevin Sack, "David Duke Misses Louisiana Runoff but Has Strong Showing", New York Times, May 3, 1999
  10. ^ a b Jacoby, Mary (June 25, 2005). "Almanac of American Politics". Retrieved 2007-12-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  11. ^ Christopher Tidmore, "The Weekly's inside political track", Louisiana Weekly, March 29, 2004
  12. ^ Schor, Elana and Sam Youngman, "Vitter hides as the Senate GOP circles its wagons", The Hill, July 11, 2007
  13. ^ Rudin, Ken (2004-11-01). "Final Call: Kerry Wins Narrow Electoral Margin; GOP Gains in House, Senate". NPR. Retrieved 2008-04-30.
  14. ^ "Vitter leads opposition to immigration bill". The Times-Picayune. June 22, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ "Are Rational Immigration Laws a 'Job American Politicians Won't Do'?". Human Events. June 18, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  16. ^ Rutenberg, Jim (May 30, 2007). "Bush Takes On Conservatives Over Immigration". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-12-07. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  17. ^ "Plan to Crack Down on 'Sanctuary Cities' Killed in Senate". FOX News. October 16, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  18. ^ Shields, Gerald (November 26, 2007). "Washington Watch for November 26, 2007". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. Retrieved 2007-11-26. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  19. ^ "S. 2393: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards..." GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
  20. ^ "S. 2713--110th Congress (2008): A bill to prohibit appropriated funds from being used in contravention of section..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2008-03-05. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
  21. ^ "S. 2714: A bill to close the loophole that allowed the 9/11 hijackers to obtain credit cards..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2008-03-05. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
  22. ^ "Measures Placed on the Calendar". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2008-03-06. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
  23. ^ Gaouette, Nicole (2008-03-05). "GOP senators to introduce toughest-yet immigration package". The Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
  24. ^ "S.J.RES.31 [110th]: RA joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to United States citizenship". GovTrack. Retrieved 2008-04-09.
  25. ^ Ho, James C. (2007-03-10). "Can Congress repeal birthright citizenship?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-05-05.
  26. ^ Hernandez, Raymond (2005-10-05). "Gulf Coast Lawmakers in Spotlight as Aid Requests Pour In". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  27. ^ "Louisiana senior senator turns up heat on Bush: Democrat Landrieu escalates rhetoric against president on Katrina response", Associated Press, September 11, 2005
  28. ^ a b c Walsh, Bill (September 29, 2007). "Louisiana looks like a state of denial". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  29. ^ "Our Views: State needs flood projects". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  30. ^ "Federal water bill critical to state". The Daily Advertiser. September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  31. ^ Alpert, Bruce (November 2, 2007). "Bush vetoes massive water resources bill". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-11-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  32. ^ "Senate Overrides Bush Veto on Water Bill". The Associated Press. November 8, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  33. ^ Walsh, Bill (September 26, 2007). "Feds oppose full replacement of N.O. public housing units". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-09-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  34. ^ a b Webster, Richard A. (December 3, 2007). "Razing a ruckus". New Orleans City Business. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  35. ^ Saluny, Susan (December 3, 2007). "New Orleans Hurt by Acute Rental Shortage". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  36. ^ Bronston, Barri (November 21, 2007). "Don't be a turkey, housing advocates tell Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-11-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  37. ^ Walsh, Bill (December 13, 2007). "Quarrel stalls bill for public housing". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-12-14. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  38. ^ Raju, Manu (2008-04-02). "Landrieu's reelection bid made difficult by Vitter". The Hill. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  39. ^ "Proposed Bill Would Reinstate Safeguards for Women Taking RU486". Randall K. O'Bannon, Ph.D. February 1, 2001. Retrieved 2007-12-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  40. ^ "Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy". Kaiser Permanente. February 7, 2001. Retrieved 2007-12-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  41. ^ "H.R. 482 [107th]: RU-486 Patient Health and Safety Protection Act". GovTrack. Retrieved 2007-12-10.
  42. ^ "On the Amendment (Vitter Amdt. No.3330 )". United States Senate. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
  43. ^ Alpert, Bruce (October 19, 2007). "Abortion plan is defeated in Senate". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-10-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  44. ^ Taylor, Andrew (October 28, 2007). "No Cut in Money for Abortion Providers". Associated Press. Retrieved 2007-10-19. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  45. ^ "S. 351: Title X Family Planning Act". GovTrack. Retrieved 2007-11-17.
  46. ^ Ertelt, Steven (November 12, 2007). "Senators Ask Democrats for Amendment Revoking Abortion Center Funding". LifeNews.com. Retrieved 2007-11-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  47. ^ Ertelt, Steven (January 17, 2008). "Senator to Ensure Indian American Health Care Bill Doesn't Fund Abortions". LifeNews.com. Retrieved 2008-01-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  48. ^ "S.Amdt. 3896: To modify a section relating to limitation on use of funds..." GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2008-01-23.
  49. ^ KALB News Channel 5 (February 26, 2008). "Senate Passes Vitter Amendment to Prohibit Federal Funding of Abortions". KALB.com. Retrieved 2008-02-27. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-04-20). "On The Hill: Bill tightens abortion penalties". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-04-21. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  51. ^ "S. 2788--110th Congress (2008): Pregnant Women Health and Safety Act,". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2008-03-31. Retrieved 2008-05-06.
  52. ^ "David Vitter on the issues". On The Issues. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
  53. ^ "S.AMDT.S.2599". US Library of Congress THOMAS database.
  54. ^ "S.AMDT.4615". US Library of Congress THOMAS database.
  55. ^ "H.R.5441". US Library of Congress THOMAS database.
  56. ^ Saltzman, Jonathan (2008-02-14). "Sullivan ATF confirmation blocked". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
  57. ^ "Held up by gun-lobby radicals". The Boston Globe. 2008-02-16. Retrieved 2008-02-06.
  58. ^ Schmitt, Richard B. (2008-02-25). "ATF nominee in the crossfire". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 2008-02-25.
  59. ^ Crouere, Jeff (2007-07-12). "The Rise and Fall of David Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-05-08.
  60. ^ a b Sack, Kevin (1999-04-29). "Louisiana G.O.P. Facing David Duke, Again". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
  61. ^ Nossiter, Adam (2007-07-11). "A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
  62. ^ Hasten, Mike (2007-09-09). "Republicans set sights on control of La. House". The Town Talk. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
  63. ^ a b "The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)". LousianaConservative.com. 2007-12-06. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
  64. ^ Barrow, Bill (2007-10-30). "Term limits aren't GOP bonanza". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-07-14.
  65. ^ Barrow, Bill (2007-08-05). "Quest for La. House will look past Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-07-14. Vitter's effectiveness for raising the profile of Republican candidates in state legislative races has dissolved
  66. ^ "The 2007 Elections - Effect of Term Limits (Part I)". LousianaConservative.com. 2007-12-06. Retrieved 2008-07-14. The LCRM also suffered somewhat of a setback ... when stories arose regarding Senator Vitter's involvement with prostitutes....
  67. ^ Aynesworth, Hugh (April 18, 1999). "Morality is no issue in race for Livingston's seat; Term limit, Klansman dominate crowded campaign". The Washington Times. pp. C4. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  68. ^ "S. J. Res. 2--110th Congress (2007): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-17. Retrieved 2008-07-15.
  69. ^ "S. J. Res. 3--109th Congress (2005): A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-17. Retrieved 2008-07-15.
  70. ^ a b Babington, Charles (2007-09-15). "Bush Signs Lobby-Ethics Bill". The Associated Press. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  71. ^ "S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-04. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  72. ^ "Amendments to S. 1--110th Congress (2007): Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-04. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  73. ^ "Vitter Introduces Extensive Ethics Reform Package". David Vitter. 2008-01-04. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  74. ^ "Proposed lobbying limits apply to only one senator". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 2007-02-09. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  75. ^ "Senate cracks down on financial fraud". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 2007-01-10. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  76. ^ "S.Amdt. 10: To increase the penalty for failure to comply with lobbying..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-10. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  77. ^ "Campaigns Still A Family Affair". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 2007-01-11. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  78. ^ a b "Senate Record: Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007". GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-10. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  79. ^ "S.Amdt. 5: To modify the application of the Federal Election Campaign Act of..." GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). 2007-01-10. Retrieved 2008-05-09.
  80. ^ Walsh, Bill (September 28, 2007). "Senate OKs child health expansion". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  81. ^ Pear, Robert (October 6, 2007). "A Battle Foreshadowing a Larger Health Care War". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-10-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  82. ^ a b Sands, David R. (September 28, 2007). "White House pushes sea treaty". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  83. ^ "Pass the sea treaty". Omaha World Herald. May 16, 2004. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  84. ^ Ridenour, David A. (August, 2006). "Ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty: A Not-So-Innocent Passage". The National Center for Public Policy Research. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  85. ^ Spring, Baker and Steven Groves and Brett D. Schaefer (September 25, 2007). "The Top Five Reasons Why Conservatives Should Oppose the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea". the Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  86. ^ Gaffney Jr., Frank J. (May 18, 2004). "Don't Get LOST". National Review Online. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  87. ^ Scally, William (September 24, 2007). "Law of Sea Treaty Revived With Senate Hearings". Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  88. ^ Kraus, Don (June 6, 2007). "Time to Ratify the Law of the Sea". Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  89. ^ "Editorial: U.S. should join Law of the Sea alliance". Newsday. September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  90. ^ Dinan, Stephen (November 1, 2007). "Senate panel OKs sea treaty, but fight looms". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2007-11-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  91. ^ Applebome, Peter (1994-06-12). "Legal Gambling Bedevils Louisiana". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  92. ^ Susan, Schmidt (2005-03-13). "Casino Bid Prompted High-Stakes Lobbying". The Washington Post. p. A01.
  93. ^ Walsh, Bill (2005-07-28). "McCain defends Vitter as tribe cries foul". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  94. ^ "Our View: Tribal casinos win big bucks". The Advocate (Baton Rouge) and WBRZ-TV. 2008-04-14. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  95. ^ "Vitter Introduces Indian Gambling Reform Act". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  96. ^ "S. 2676: A bill to make technical corrections to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, and for other purposes". GovTrack. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  97. ^ "Parents Blast Military Recruiters at Schools". Associated Press. June 17, 2005. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  98. ^ Cavanagh, Sean (April 23, 2003). "Military Recruiters Meet Pockets of Resistance". Education Week. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  99. ^ "Section 9528 of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Section on Military recruitment (PDF - English)" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-12-03.
  100. ^ "H.R.1346". The Library of Congress. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  101. ^ Honda, Mike (March 6, 2007). "Military recruiters have access to our children's personal information". Mike M. Honda. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  102. ^ Zeller, Shawn (July 9, 2007). "Revisiting the No-Child Recruitment Plan". Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  103. ^ Lerman, David. "Senate approves Jim Webb's new GI Bill". Daily Press. Retrieved 2008-05-22. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)
  104. ^ "Senate Passes Iraq War Funding Bill". The Associated Press. 2008-05-22. Retrieved 2008-05-22.
  105. ^ "Vote Summary". United States Senate. 2008-05-22. Retrieved 2008-05-22.
  106. ^ "S. Res. 132 (109th): A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2008-01-16.
  107. ^ a b Mitchell, David J. (January 20, 2007). "Tangipahoa parties say ruling unclear". The Advocate (Baton Rouge). Archived from the original on 2007-01-20. Retrieved 2008-01-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  108. ^ "S. Res. 35: A resolution expressing support for prayer at school board meetings". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 2008-01-16.
  109. ^ "Doe v. Tangipahoa Parish Sch. Bd., No. 05-30294 (5th Cir. Dec. 15, 2006)". National School Boards Association. December, 2006. Retrieved 2008-01-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  110. ^ Mitchell, David J. (August 22, 2007). "Tangipahoa board OKs prayer policy". The Advocate (Baton Rouge). Archived from the original on 2007-08-22. Retrieved 2008-01-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  111. ^ Vitter, David (June 25, 2007). "Vitter Pushes for Reauthorization of Abstinence Education Program". David Vitter press release. Retrieved 2007-07-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  112. ^ Vitter, David and Bunning, Jim (June 21, 2007). "Letter to the chairman and ranking member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  113. ^ "Federal Abstinence Funding Safe for Another Year". Focus on the Family. October 24, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  114. ^ "Lautenberg gives up on fight about 'abstinence-only' sex education". The Star-Ledger. October 24, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  115. ^ Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relating to marriage. (Introduced in House), HJ 56 IH, 108th CONGRESS, H. J. RES. 56 May 21, 2003, Mrs. MUSGRAVE (for herself, Mr. HALL, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, and Mr. VITTER)
  116. ^ "Vitter Statement on Protecting the Sanctity of Marriage". Vitter2004.com. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  117. ^ "Senate set to reject gay marriage ban: Backers see 'important debate'; critics blast effort to 'misdirect'", CNN, June 7, 2006
  118. ^ a b c Norrister, Adam (July 11, 2007). "A Senator's Moral High Ground Gets a Little Shaky". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  119. ^ "Louisiana Senator Compares Hurricanes to Gay Marriage", gayapolis.com, News, posted October 18, 2005; accessed July 10, 2007
  120. ^ a b c Walsh, David (September 22, 2007). "Vitter earmarked federal money for creationist group". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-09-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  121. ^ "Origins Science". Louisiana Family Forum. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  122. ^ "Political Campaign Activity". Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  123. ^ "Vitter Sends Shockwaves". Louisiana Family Forum. Retrieved 2007-11-10.
  124. ^ "Groups Ask Senate To Remove Earmark Promoting Creationism From Spending Bill". Common Dreams NewsCenter. October 17, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  125. ^ "Earmark for Anti-Science Creationist Group Must Be Removed". People For the American Way. October 17, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  126. ^ Walsh, Bill (October 19, 2007). "Vitter shifts $100,000 from religious group". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-11-02. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  127. ^ "Vitter earmark withdrawn". National Center for Science Education. October 18, 2007. Retrieved 2007-10-18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  128. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-05-01). "Vitter seeks funding for child-safety act". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-05-01.
  129. ^ "Vitter Offers Amendment to Fund Adam Walsh Act". David Vitter. Retrieved 2008-05-01.
  130. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-05-22). "Republicans fret about fate this fall". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-05-22.
  131. ^ Rood, Justin (July 10, 2007). "'Hustler' Call May Have Prompted Vitter Admission". ABC News. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  132. ^ "Woman Convicted in Washington Escort Case". The Associated Press. 2008-04-16. Retrieved 2008-04-21.
  133. ^ Douglass K. Daniel, "Senator's number on escort service list", Associated Press, July 10, 2007
  134. ^ Keith I. Marszalek, "Vitter had five calls with D.C. Madam", New Orleans Times-Picayune, July 11, 2007
  135. ^ Charles Babington, "Escort service called lawmaker 5 times", AP News, July 12, 2007
  136. ^ "Scandal-linked senator breaks a week of silence". CNN.com. July 17, 2007. Retrieved 2008-08-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  137. ^ "Vitter comes out of seclusion, claims New Orleans prostitutes don't exist; some say otherwise" (PDF). Louisiana Weekly. July 23, 2007. Retrieved 2008-08-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  138. ^ McCarthy, Brendan (July 16, 2007). "Vitter re-emerges and asks again for forgiveness". The Times Picayune. Retrieved 2008-08-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  139. ^ a b "Senator's Link to 'D.C. Madam' Exposed". The Associated Press. July 10, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  140. ^ Konigsmark, Anne Rochell (December 20, 1998). "A Week Of Crisis Impeachment: The Speakership Livingston's Constituents Decision to resign jolts home district". The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Constitution. pp. D4. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  141. ^ Alpert, Bruce (July 11, 2007). "Vitter unlikely to face criminal charges". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  142. ^ "Vitter Returns to Senate" Washington Post, July 17, 2007
  143. ^ Walsh, Bill (November 14, 2007). "Senator receives subpoena to testify about escort use". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-11-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  144. ^ Shields, Gerald (November 15, 2007). "Attorney doesn't answer queries on Vitter plans". The Advocate (Baton Rouge). Retrieved 2007-11-15. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  145. ^ "Senator Spared Testimony in Escort Case". The Associated Press. November 22, 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  146. ^ Alpert, Bruce and Walsh, Bill (December 2, 2007). "Vitter avoids talking about escort for now". New Orleans Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-12-03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  147. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-04-05). "Vitter might take the Fifth". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  148. ^ Crabtree, Susan (2008-04-14). "Vitter won't testify in D.C. Madam case". The Hill. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  149. ^ "Sen. David Vitter Placed on Witness List in Prostitution Trial; Driver Backs into "No Parking" Sign". WAFB. 2008-04-07. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  150. ^ "CREW Asks Why Senate Ethics Committee Admonished Senator Craig and Not Sen. Vitter". Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-02-16.
  151. ^ Pershing, Ben (2008-05-08). "Senate Ethics Dismisses Vitter Complaint". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-05-08.
  152. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-08-20). "'D.C. Madam' case could hit Vitter in his wallet". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  153. ^ Duncan, Thomasenia P.; et al. (2008-08-21). "Agenda Document No. 08-20" (PDF). Federal Elections Commission. Retrieved 2008-08-24. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |first= (help)
  154. ^ Cadei, Emily (2008-08-21). "FEC Punts on McCain and Vitter". Congressional Quarterly. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  155. ^ Holland, Jesse J. (2008-08-21). "Vitter can use some campaign funds for legal fees". Associated Press. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  156. ^ Alpert, Bruce (2008-08-22). "FEC split in Vitter's push for legal fees - Bills top $200,000 in D.C. Madam case". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-08-24.
  157. ^ "Canal Street Madam Says Vitter Was Client". WDSU. July 10, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  158. ^ Moran, Kate and Carr, Martha (July 10, 2007). "Madam: Vitter a client at Canal Street brothel". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  159. ^ Moran, Kate (July 10, 2007). "Former madam says Vitter was a client at Canal Street brothel". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  160. ^ Alpert, Bruce (July 12, 2007). "Legal trouble unlikely for Vitter". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  161. ^ "Madam links Sen. Vitter to brothel". LA Times. July 12, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  162. ^ Burdeau, Cain (July 11, 2007). "Vitter was client of a New Orleans brothel, madam claims". The Shreveport Times. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  163. ^ Tidmore, Christopher (March 29, 2004). "Congressman Denies Affair With Prostitute". The Louisiana Weekly. Retrieved 2007-07-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  164. ^ Moran, Kate (July 13, 2007). "Prostitute describes Vitter affair". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-13. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  165. ^ Moran, Kate (September 12, 2007). "Ex-call girl, Flynt keep pressure on Vitter". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-09-29. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  166. ^ Walsh, Bill (July 13, 2007). "Louisiana Republicans offer guarded support for Vitter". Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2007-07-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  167. ^ Radelat, Ana (July 19, 2007). "Vitter tries to move forward". Gannett News Service. Retrieved 2007-07-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  168. ^ Nichols, John (July 17, 2007). "A "Family Values" Headache for Senate GOP". The Nation. Retrieved 2007-07-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  169. ^ Lipman, Larry (September 30, 2007). "A year later, Foley fallout lingers". Palm Beach Post. Retrieved 2007-09-30. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  170. ^ Blumner, Robyn (September 30, 2007). "Republicans and their big Greenspan gap". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved 2007-09-30. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  171. ^ Kuraitis, Jill (October 7, 2007). "Novak: Senate R's Knew Craig 'Had This Problem'". New West. Retrieved 2007-10-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  172. ^ Means, Marianne (July 23, 2007). "Republicans celebrate hypocrisy". Times Herald-Record. Retrieved 2007-07-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  173. ^ Goldman, Julianna (October 5, 2007). "Craig Faces U.S. Senate Censure, Not Expulsion, Brownback Says". Bloomberg Television. Retrieved 2007-10-06. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  174. ^ Radelat, Ana (July 11, 2007). "Flynt says New Orleans prostitutes told on senator". Gannett News Service. Retrieved 2007-07-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  175. ^ Crouere, Jeff (July 23, 2007). "Sex scandal dissipates Vitter's political power". New Orleans City Business. Retrieved 2007-07-23. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  176. ^ "Our Views: Delegation suffers loss". The Advocate. December 15, 2007. Retrieved 2007-12-14. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  177. ^ Salamme, Elisabeth (December, 2007). "Top 10 Awkward Moments". Time Magazine. Retrieved 2007-12-17. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  178. ^ Kurtz, Howard (2008-03-18). "Media Backtalk". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  179. ^ Akers, Mary Ann (2008-03-19). "Sen. Vitter Resents Comparisons with Ex-Gov. Spitzer". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  180. ^ Bleifuss, Joel (2008-04-21). "Political Vice Squad". In These Times. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  181. ^ Crouere, Jeff (2008-03-14). "Spitzer Sex Scandal Reminds Nation of Vitter's Sins". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  182. ^ "Spitzer, Vitter spark different reactions to scandal accusations". The Associated Press. 2008-03-14. Retrieved 2008-04-26.
  183. ^ Walsh, Bill (2008-04-23). "Kennedy Senate run gets financial push". The Times-Picayune. Retrieved 2008-04-26. Vitter's impressive haul suggests that despite his involvement in the "D.C. Madam" scandal as one-time client of the escort service, his political support remains strong among rank-and-file Republicans in Louisiana.
  184. ^ Wilson, Reid (2008-07-01). "LA Race Tightens". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved 2008-07-01. Given Vitter's recent troubles, one might expect a low favorable rating. Instead, the junior senator is seen positively by 55% of voters in Louisiana, compared with just 38% who view him unfavorably.
  185. ^ Hesse, Monica (2008-05-02). "The Scandal Story With a Most Unhappy Ending". The Washington Post. p. C01. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
  186. ^ Sauer, Maddy (2008-05-02). "Madams Fall While Their Johns Prosper". ABC News. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
  187. ^ Zagorin, Adam (2008-05-01). "D.C. Madam: Suicide Before Prison". Time. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
U.S. House of Representatives
Preceded by Member of the U.S. House of Representatives
from Louisiana's 1st congressional district

1999 – 2005
Succeeded by
U.S. Senate
Preceded by U.S. senator (Class 3) from Louisiana
2005–present
Served alongside: Mary Landrieu
Incumbent
U.S. order of precedence (ceremonial)
Preceded by United States Senators by seniority
83rd
Succeeded by

Template:Persondata