Jump to content

Arms industry: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m punctuation
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''arms industry''' is a global [[industry]] and [[business]] which [[manufacture]]s and sells [[weapons]] and [[military technology and equipment]]. Arms producing companies, also referred to as [[Defense contractor|Defense companies]] or military industry, produce arms mainly for the [[armed forces]] of [[state]]s. Products include [[gun]]s, [[ammunition]], [[missile]]s, [[military aircraft]], [[military vehicle]]s, [[ship]]s, [[electronic Systems]], and more. The arms industry also conducts significant [[research and development]].
The '''arms industry''' is a global [[industry]] and [[business]] which [[manufacture]]s and sells [[weapons]] and [[military technology and equipment]]. Arms producing companies, also referred to as [[Defense contractor|Defense companies]] or military industry, produce arms mainly for the [[armed forces]] of [[state]]s. Products include [[gun]]s, [[ammunition]], [[missile]]s, [[military aircraft]], [[military vehicle]]s, [[ship]]s, [[electronic Systems]], and more. The arms industry also conducts significant [[research and development]].


It is estimated that yearly, over 1 trillion dollars are spent on military expenditures worldwide (2% of World [[GDP]]). <ref>[http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade.asp www.globalissues.org]</ref> Part of this goes to the procurement of military hardware and services from the military industry. The combined arms sales of the top 100 largest arms producing companies amounted to an estimated $315 billion in 2006. <ref>[http://www.sipri.org]</ref> In 2004 over $30 billion were spent in the international arms trade (a figure that excludes domestic sales of arms)<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4238644.stm BBC]</ref> Many industrialized countries have a domestic arms industry to supply their own military forces. Some countries also have a substantial legal or illegal domestic trade in weapons for use by its citizens. The illegal trade in [[small arms]] is prevalent in many countries and regions affected by political instability.
It is estimated that yearly, over 1 trillion dollars are spent on military expenditures worldwide (2% of World [[GDP]]). <ref>[http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/ArmsTrade.asp www.globalissues.org]</ref> Part of this goes to the procurement of military hardware and services from the military industry. The combined arms sales of the top 100 largest arms producing companies amounted to an estimated $315 billion in 2006. <ref>[http://www.sipri.org]</ref> In 2004 over $30 billion were spent in the international arms trade (a figure that excludes domestic sales of arms).<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4238644.stm BBC]</ref> Many industrialized countries have a domestic arms industry to supply their own military forces. Some countries also have a substantial legal or illegal domestic trade in weapons for use by its citizens. The illegal trade in [[small arms]] is prevalent in many countries and regions affected by political instability.


Contracts to supply a given country's military are awarded by the government, making arms contracts of substantial political importance. The link between politics and the arms trade can result in the development of what US President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] described as a [[military-industrial complex]], where the armed forces, commerce, and politics become closely linked. Various corporations, some publicly held, others private, bid for these contracts, which are often worth many billions of dollars. Sometimes, such as the contract for the new Joint Strike Fighter, a competitive tendering process takes place, where the decision is made on the merits of the design submitted by the companies involved. Other times, no bidding or competition takes place.
Contracts to supply a given country's military are awarded by the government, making arms contracts of substantial political importance. The link between politics and the arms trade can result in the development of what US President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] described as a [[military-industrial complex]], where the armed forces, commerce, and politics become closely linked. Various corporations, some publicly held, others private, bid for these contracts, which are often worth many billions of dollars. Sometimes, such as the contract for the new Joint Strike Fighter, a competitive tendering process takes place, where the decision is made on the merits of the design submitted by the companies involved. Other times, no bidding or competition takes place.

Revision as of 18:26, 15 October 2008

The arms industry is a global industry and business which manufactures and sells weapons and military technology and equipment. Arms producing companies, also referred to as Defense companies or military industry, produce arms mainly for the armed forces of states. Products include guns, ammunition, missiles, military aircraft, military vehicles, ships, electronic Systems, and more. The arms industry also conducts significant research and development.

It is estimated that yearly, over 1 trillion dollars are spent on military expenditures worldwide (2% of World GDP). [1] Part of this goes to the procurement of military hardware and services from the military industry. The combined arms sales of the top 100 largest arms producing companies amounted to an estimated $315 billion in 2006. [2] In 2004 over $30 billion were spent in the international arms trade (a figure that excludes domestic sales of arms).[3] Many industrialized countries have a domestic arms industry to supply their own military forces. Some countries also have a substantial legal or illegal domestic trade in weapons for use by its citizens. The illegal trade in small arms is prevalent in many countries and regions affected by political instability.

Contracts to supply a given country's military are awarded by the government, making arms contracts of substantial political importance. The link between politics and the arms trade can result in the development of what US President Dwight D. Eisenhower described as a military-industrial complex, where the armed forces, commerce, and politics become closely linked. Various corporations, some publicly held, others private, bid for these contracts, which are often worth many billions of dollars. Sometimes, such as the contract for the new Joint Strike Fighter, a competitive tendering process takes place, where the decision is made on the merits of the design submitted by the companies involved. Other times, no bidding or competition takes place.

In the Cold War Era, arms exports were used by both the Soviet Union and the United States to influence their standings in other countries, particularly Third World Countries. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, global arms exports initially fell slightly, but have since grown again to cold war levels.[4] The United States is the overall top supplier of weapons. The United States is also the top supplier of weapons to the developing world, accounting for around 36% of worldwide weapons sales, followed by Russia, Britain, Germany and China.[5][6]

The Control Arms Campaign, founded by Amnesty International, Oxfam, and the International Action Network on Small Arms, estimates that there are over 600 million items of small arms in circulation, and that over 1135 companies based in more than 98 different countries manufacture small arms as well as their various components and ammunition. According to Oxfam, an estimated 500,000 individuals die in small arms-conflicts every year, approximately one death per minute.[7]

Sectors

File:Rifle AK47 Olive Drab.gif
The AK series of weapons have been produced in greater numbers than any other assault rifle and have been used in conflicts all over the world.

Land-based weapons

This category includes everything from light arms to heavy artillery, and the majority of producers are small. Many are located in Third World countries. International trade in handguns, machine guns, tanks, armored personal carriers and other relatively inexpensive weapons is substantial. There is relatively little regulation at the international level, and as a result, many legitimately produced weapons fall into the hands of rebel forces, terrorists, or regimes under sanctions. [8]

Aerospace systems

Encompassing military aircraft (both land-based and naval aviation), conventional missiles, and military satellites, this is the most technologically advanced sector of the market. It is also the least competitive from an economic standpoint, with a handful of companies dominating the entire market. The top clients and major producers are virtually all located in the West, with the United States easily in first place. Prominent aerospace firms include Dassault Aviation, EADS, Thales Group, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Britain's BAE Systems. There are also several multinational consortia mostly involved in the manufacturing of fighter jets, such as the Eurofighter. The largest military contract in history, signed in October 2001, involved the development of the Joint Strike Fighter. [8]

All of the world's major powers maintain substantial maritime forces to provide a forward presence and enhance overall mobility, with the largest nations possessing aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and advanced anti-air defense systems. The vast majority of military ships are conventionally powered, but some are nuclear-powered. There is also a large global market in second-hand naval vessels, generally purchased by developing countries from Western governments. [8]

World's largest defense budgets

This is a list of the fifteen countries with the highest defense budgets for the year 2006. The information is from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, [9] Total World spending amounted to $ 1,158 billion USD in 2006, with nearly half of the total amount spent by the United States.

Military expenditure in market exchange rate dollar terms, 2006
Rank Country Spending ($b.) %GDP[3]
World Total 1,158[4] 2.41
1 United States United States 528.7 3.99
2 United Kingdom United Kingdom 59.2 2.49
3 France France 53.1 2.38
4 China People's Republic of China 49.5[1] 1.88
5 Japan Japan 43.7 1.00
6 Germany Germany 37.0 1.28
7 Russia Russia 34.7[1] 3.54
8 Italy Italy 33.9 1.61
9 Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia 29.0[2] 8.32
10 India India 23.9 2.69
11 South Korea South Korea 21.9 2.47
12 Canada Canada 14.6 1.10
13 Australia Australia 13.8 1.83
14 Brazil Brazil 13.4 1.26
15 Spain Spain 12.3 1.00
  1. Data for China and Russia are estimates, their expenditures are not well known.
  2. Data for Saudi Arabia include expenditure for public order and safety and might be slight overestimates.
  3. In the percentage spending per GDP, the GDP list (2006) of the International Monetary Fund was taken.
  4. One quarter of the world total is illicit and/or black market trade.

World's largest arms exporters

The unit in this table are so-called trend indicater values expressed in millions of dollars, US.. These values do not represent real financial flows but are a crude instrument to estimate volumes of arms transfers, regardless of the contracted prices, which can be as low as zero in the case of military aid.

Supplier 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2000-2007
United States USA 7505 5801 4984 5581 6616 7026 7821 7454 52789
Russia Russia 4190 5631 5458 5355 6400 5576 6463 4588 43661
European Union EU 4424 4026 3320 3360 3978 4629 5945 6458 36140
Germany Germany (FRG) 1622 825 910 1707 1017 1879 2891 3395 14246
France France 1033 1235 1342 1313 2267 1688 1586 2690 13154
United Kingdom UK 1356 1116 772 624 1143 871 978 1151 8010
Netherlands Netherlands 259 192 243 342 218 611 1575 1355 4794
Sweden Sweden 308 850 125 468 287 536 472 413 3424
Italy Italy 192 224 407 321 216 787 860 562 3420
China China 228 498 544 553 271 223 564 355 3353
Ukraine Ukraine 280 649 210 456 427 308 133 109 2917
Israel Israel 321 298 365 309 533 244 258 238 2614
Spain Spain 46 7 120 158 73 116 803 529 1873
Canada Canada 83 129 182 279 305 193 227 343 1757
Switzerland Switzerland 104 120 109 139 201 166 144 211 1260
Belarus Belarus 261 299 54 80 50 24 838
Poland Poland 43 70 36 70 65 103 169 135 678
South Korea South Korea 8 165 114 20 39 89 214 623
Uzbekistan Uzbekistan 73 340 170 4 587
South Africa South Africa 18 29 16 73 41 24 140 80 420
Czech Republic Czech Republic 78 89 58 64 1 40 56 13 406
Romania Romania 30 30

The information is from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute and is updated at least once a year.

Next to SIPRI there are several other sources that provide data on international transfers of arms. These include national reports by national governments about arms exports, the UN register on conventional arms and an annual publication by the US US Congressional Research Service that includes data on arms exports to developing countries as compiled by US intelligence agencies. A list of such sources can be found at the SIPRI website. [2] Due to the different methodologies and definitions used different sources often provide significantly different data. For example, according to Statistisk sentralbyrå (Norway state statistics), Norway exports a greater value (in USD) of arms than many of the nations listed above. Some of the differences are possibly due to deliberate over or under reporting by some of the sources. Governments may claim high arms exports as part of their role in marketing efforts of their national arms industry or they may claim low arms exports in order to be perceived as a responsible international actor.

List of major weapon manufacturers

For a complete list, see: List of modern armament manufacturers
Major arms industry corporations by nation
Country Weapon manufacturers and Arms Traders
Argentina Fábrica Militar
Fábrica Militar de Aviones
Austria Glock
Steyr Mannlicher
Australia Tenix
Australian Defence Industries
Australian Submarine Corporation
Commonwealth Aircraft Corporation
Belgium Fabrique Nationale de Herstal
Bosnia and Herzegovina Zrak dd
Brazil Ares Aeroespacial e Defesa
Avibras
CBC - Companhia Brasileira de Cartuchos
Embraer
Helibras
IMBEL - Indústria Brasileira de Material Bélico, belonging to the Brazilian Army
Taurus
Canada Colt Canada
China Norinco
AVIC I
AVIC II
Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group
China Nanchang Aircraft Manufacturing Corporation
Changhe Aircraft Industries Corporation
China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC)
China National Nuclear Corporation
China Aerospace Science & Technology Corporation (CASC)
Denmark Skandinavisk Aero Industri
Egypt AOI
France EADS
Dassault Aviation
DCN
Thales Group
GIAT Industries
Germany Carl Walther GmbH Sportwaffen
Diehl BGT Defence
EADS
Heckler & Koch
Krauss-Maffei
Rheinmetall
Mauser
Lürssen
Thyssenkrupp
MBDA
India DRDO
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited
Indonesia PT Pindad
Perindustrian Angkatan Darat
Israel Israel Aerospace Industries
Israel Weapon Industries
RAFAEL Armament Development Authority
Elbit
Italy Beretta
Finmeccanica
Fincantieri
Avio
AgustaWestland
Benelli (firearms)
Myanmar Reliable Technology Limited
Norway Kongsberg Defense & Aerospace
Nordic Ammunition Group
Poland Bumar
PZL
Pakistan Pakistan Aeronautical Complex
Heavy Industries Taxila
Portugal INDEP
Russia Sukhoi
Mikoyan
Mil Moscow Helicopter Plant
Tupolev
Ilyushin
Yakovlev
Tikhomirov Scientific Research Institute of Instrument Design
Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology
IZH
Kartsev-Venediktov Design Bureau
Almaz Scientific Industrial Corporation
Vympel NPO
Beriev
FSUE "Splav"
Serbia Zastava Arms
Yugoimport
South Africa Denel
Spain EADS-CASA
Navantia
Santa Barbara (General Dynamics)
Sweden BAE Systems Bofors
Kockums
Saab
Switzerland SIGARMS
RUAG
Pilatus Aircraft
Armasuisse
MOWAG (General Dynamics)
Thailand Chaiseri Metal & Rubber
Thailand Aviation Industries TAI
Turkey MKEK
TAI
Aselsan
Ukraine Antonov
KMDB
Malyshev Factory
RPC Fort
Yuzhmash
Yuzhnoye Design Bureau
United Kingdom BAE Systems
Cobham plc
MBDA
Rolls-Royce
United States AAI Corporation
BAE Systems Inc.
Boeing
Carlyle Group

Colt's Manufacturing Company
General Atomics
General Electric (primarily through GEAE)
General Dynamics
Honeywell
Lockheed-Martin
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Raytheon Corporation
United Technologies (primarily through Pratt and Whitney, Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation)

Control and international treaty

The European Union Council stated to the U.N. General Assembly:

We are committed to upholding, implementing and further strengthening the multilateral disarmament and non-proliferation framework in the fight against threats which are tending to escape the control of national sovereignty, the challenges deriving from destabilising accumulation and spread of small arms and light weapons, from illicit or irresponsible arms trade, and from the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, which are creating new and growing hot-spots of international tension. In this regard, the EU welcomes the growing support in all parts of the world for an International Arms Trade Treaty and is firmly committed to this process.[10]

Institutes participating in weapon research and warfare simulation

Ethical dimension

For many people, arms exports may pose an ethical challenge, as they may see supplying the weapons for a conflict as morally akin to becoming involved with negligible personal, national or corporate risk. Essentially, they view the arms industry as a means of profiting from war and death when failure to supply arms could lead to an early disengagement.

On the other hand, exporting arms to groups (or nations) with "laudable" goals- a rebel group overthrowing a fascist regime, say- can be an invaluable equalizer in the conflict. And there is no shortage of parties to a conflict- the Hutus during the Rwandan genocide, for example- that had little trouble making use of such archaic, inexpensive technology as the machete, to attack and terrorize the Tutsi community.

Of course- and this is endemic of nearly every debate over arms trade- the terminology used and the people it refers to can be frustratingly fluid. As years pass, governments decide on new "interests" and circumstances change accordingly. "Freedom fighters" become "insurgents". "Terrorists" become "invaluable allies", and "religious zealots" morph into "agents of stability". Entire nations, to use the parlance of the early 21st century, can go from the "Coalition of the Willing" to the "Axis of Evil" in very little time, and every change affects policy and the distribution of arms in the world.

See also

References