User talk:Verbal/Old01

Hello Verbal:

Thank you for the kind welcome to wikipedia.

You stated that my facts may be true but needed sourcing. Please indicate which of the facts that I mentioned in the edit are in dire need of sourcing.

Kind Regards,

Orthopodiatrust

A quick reply

Saw your note on my talk page - I have been out of the country for a couple of days. My comment about "not helping yourself" was a very simple way of saying that I believed the other party had given themselves enough rope now, the case/point had been made, we're heading to closure so there was no need to continue the argument, as that's when it starts making you look bad :-) BMW(drive) 10:12, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. :) Thanks for the reply. Verbal chat 10:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Noise (music) revert

Hello Verbal, you have reverted a page that is under dispute please read the following:

Despite a protracted dispute with Valueyou leading to intervention of multiple editors, Valueyou's immediate action, following the conclusion of this period of disruption, was to revert the disputed article to a condition that Valueyou deemed acceptable, therefore leaving outstanding issues with WP:OR, WP:VER, WP:SYN, unaddressed. The dispute esentially relates to disagreement about tagging and to Semitransgenic's request for citations. The origin of this dispute can be traced to here. The user engaged in WP:CANVASS by copy pasting a personal attack across the talk pages of multiple articles user Semitransgenic has edited. There is also evidence of Valueyou accusing Semitransgenic of anti-semitism, resulting in Valueyou attempting to canvass ברוקולי. This last allegation arose as a result of the statement made here at 17:42 on the 10th of August. Irrespective of the nature of this hostile campaign Semitransgenic attempted to arrive at a truce but Valueyou's repsonse was instead to engage in antagonistic reversion. Please advise. Semitransgenic (talk) 10:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I requested page numbers on multiple occasions so that I can check the cites, the content is problematic and there is evidence of synthesis. The references cannot be checked without page numbers, that is why the banner WP:OR banner was in place, and that is why it is in my view not simply a question of placing check tags where problematic cites exist. If you have specific policy that addresses this please provide me with the relevant passage so that I confirm your actions are correct. Thanks. Semitransgenic (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, to clarify, I thought you had done a straight revert, but I see now that you placed verification tags throughout, I can see how this is potentially a more constructive approach, but if you have time please comment on the question I aksed above. Thanks! Semitransgenic (talk) 11:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi I'll look later - I thought having the refs where they could be seen so they could be checked might help. Thanks for acknowledging this. Ugh - and sorry for all the typos in my edit summary :s Verbal chat 12:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)