User talk:82.18.14.143: Difference between revisions
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Can you please explain why [http://iarnuocon.newsvine.com/_news/2008/06/27/1618494-it-just-keeps-getting-better-conservapedia-censors-its-own-users-over-lenski-letter this] isn't a reliable source? I as well as many others use this site as a regular source of daily news. Do you have evidence of bias from them? I know they're a subsidiary of [[MSNBC]] but not agreeing with a news source isn't a reason for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_censored#Wikipedia_is_not_censored censoring it]. You can reply on this page, as I am watching it. [[User:meinsla|<font color="DarkOrange">'''meinsla'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:meinsla|'''<font color="DarkGray">talk</font>''']]</sup> 12:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC) |
Can you please explain why [http://iarnuocon.newsvine.com/_news/2008/06/27/1618494-it-just-keeps-getting-better-conservapedia-censors-its-own-users-over-lenski-letter this] isn't a reliable source? I as well as many others use this site as a regular source of daily news. Do you have evidence of bias from them? I know they're a subsidiary of [[MSNBC]] but not agreeing with a news source isn't a reason for [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_censored#Wikipedia_is_not_censored censoring it]. You can reply on this page, as I am watching it. [[User:meinsla|<font color="DarkOrange">'''meinsla'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:meinsla|'''<font color="DarkGray">talk</font>''']]</sup> 12:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC) |
||
: It's an article on newsvine.com, which is basically just a big personal opinion/news blog. I'm in favor of improving our coverage of this affair, but it's better to wait until it's picked up by mainstream outlets. (Tony Sidaway) --[[Special:Contributions/82.18.14.143|82.18.14.143]] ([[User talk:82.18.14.143#top|talk]]) 09:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:55, 16 October 2008
Welcome
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your stupid contributions. I hope you hate the place and decide to run away. Here are some pages you might like to vandalise:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides no discernible benefit. If you edit without a username, your IP address (82.18.14.143) is used to target your home with thermonuclear missiles.
In any case, I hope you don't enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out sod off, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then run around bollock naked shouting "hallelujah". Again, welcome! Cirt (talk) 16:18, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make destructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Klaatu barada nikto, did not appear to be destructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Klaatu barada nikto was changed by 82.18.14.143 (u) (t) deleting 24239 characters on 2008-08-26T15:41:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Can you please explain why this isn't a reliable source? I as well as many others use this site as a regular source of daily news. Do you have evidence of bias from them? I know they're a subsidiary of MSNBC but not agreeing with a news source isn't a reason for censoring it. You can reply on this page, as I am watching it. meinsla talk 12:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- It's an article on newsvine.com, which is basically just a big personal opinion/news blog. I'm in favor of improving our coverage of this affair, but it's better to wait until it's picked up by mainstream outlets. (Tony Sidaway) --82.18.14.143 (talk) 09:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)