Jump to content

Talk:University of Bristol: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 86.142.132.137 - ""
League tables: new section
Line 38: Line 38:


The numbers cited are those that university submits to HE Stats Agency (HESA). They will include those students who are specifically noted as not being included on the university's page which you link to because they are "dormant" (mostly taking a year out), research students who are writing up or students on the university's continuing education programmes. [[User:Pauln1964|Pauln1964]] ([[User talk:Pauln1964|talk]]) 09:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
The numbers cited are those that university submits to HE Stats Agency (HESA). They will include those students who are specifically noted as not being included on the university's page which you link to because they are "dormant" (mostly taking a year out), research students who are writing up or students on the university's continuing education programmes. [[User:Pauln1964|Pauln1964]] ([[User talk:Pauln1964|talk]]) 09:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

== League tables ==

I think it's rather disingenuous that the Guardian league table placing has been removed from the table in this article - probably to disguise the fact that we dropped to 32nd in their estimation this year. The claim that Bristol in in the top ten according to most published league tables is simply no longer true (unless you're counting the placings from previous years as well - again, rather disingenuous if so!).

This is supposed to be a factual encyclopedia article. It is not supposed to be an advertisement or a place to publish massaged figures in order to make a few members of the student body feel better about studying here...[[Special:Contributions/137.222.235.7|137.222.235.7]] ([[User talk:137.222.235.7|talk]]) 08:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:18, 19 October 2008

Good articleUniversity of Bristol has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 24, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 4, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconHigher education GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
WikiProject iconEngland Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

/Archive 1

Merchant Venturers' technical school

I think that the first paragraph should include a reference to the Merchant Venturers’ Technical College (founded as a school 1595 and which became the university Engineering faculty[1]. Only an English university would fail to mention such a legacy! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.132.137 (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

A peer review has taken place on the article allowing it to be ripped apart or allowing constructive criticism depending on your viewpoint. The above link allows you to view the comments. 92.11.14.235 (talk) 21:09, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Student numbers...

The figures in the article are plain wrong...

See hyah....http://www.bristol.ac.uk/ssio/studentdata/statistics/new_matrix/totalstunos_year.html

Good day.80.41.234.109 (talk) 09:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers cited are those that university submits to HE Stats Agency (HESA). They will include those students who are specifically noted as not being included on the university's page which you link to because they are "dormant" (mostly taking a year out), research students who are writing up or students on the university's continuing education programmes. Pauln1964 (talk) 09:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

League tables

I think it's rather disingenuous that the Guardian league table placing has been removed from the table in this article - probably to disguise the fact that we dropped to 32nd in their estimation this year. The claim that Bristol in in the top ten according to most published league tables is simply no longer true (unless you're counting the placings from previous years as well - again, rather disingenuous if so!).

This is supposed to be a factual encyclopedia article. It is not supposed to be an advertisement or a place to publish massaged figures in order to make a few members of the student body feel better about studying here...137.222.235.7 (talk) 08:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]