Jump to content

Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Added {{uncategorized}} and {{unreferenced}} tags to article. using Friendly
Added categories.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unreferenced|date=October 2008}}
{{unreferenced|date=October 2008}}
Miller v. National Broadcasting Co. 232 Cal. Rptr 688 (1986)
'''Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.''' 232 Cal. Rptr 688 (1986)


==Background==
Facts of the Case-
On October 30th, 1979 an NBC camera crew was following a group Los Angeles Fire Department firefighters and paramedics. A call came in about a man having a heart attack. The camera crew and the paramedics rushed to the home of Brownie and Dave Miller. The camera crew, without consent from anyone, rushed into the house with the paramedics and taped footage of Mr. Dave Miller having what would be a fatal heart attack. The crew later that night would put the footage on the air, also without consent. Brownie Miller filed suit against NBC, Ruben Norte (a producer for NBC) and the city of Los Angeles for trespass, invasion of privacy infliction of emotional distress.
On October 30th, 1979 an NBC camera crew was following a group of [[Los Angeles Fire Department]] firefighters and paramedics. A call came in about a man having a heart attack. The camera crew and the paramedics rushed to the home of Brownie and Dave Miller. The camera crew, without consent from anyone, rushed into the house with the paramedics and taped footage of Mr. Dave Miller having what would be a fatal heart attack. The crew later that night would put the footage on the air, also without consent. Brownie Miller filed suit against NBC, Ruben Norte (a producer for NBC) and the city of Los Angeles for trespass, invasion of privacy infliction of emotional distress.


Legal Issue-
==Legal Issue==
Does the media, even though they obtain consent from the group they are following (Police, firefighters, paramedics, etc.) have the same access privileges as the police of paramedics do if they are following them on scene?
Does the media, even though they obtain consent from the group they are following (Police, firefighters, paramedics, etc.) have the same access privileges as the police of paramedics do if they are following them on scene?


Decision of the Court-
==Decision==
The Court ruled, ultimately, in favor of the plaintiff on the charges of Invasion of Privacy and infliction of Emotional Distress.
The Court ruled, ultimately, in favor of the plaintiff on the charges of Invasion of Privacy and infliction of Emotional Distress.


Reasoning of the Court-
===Reasoning===
“One seeking emergency medical attention does not thereby “open the door” for persons without any clearly identifiable and justifiable official reason who may wish to enter the premises where the medical aid is being administered…the clear line of demarcation between the public interest served by public officials and that served by private business must not be obscured.”
“One seeking emergency medical attention does not thereby “open the door” for persons without any clearly identifiable and justifiable official reason who may wish to enter the premises where the medical aid is being administered…the clear line of demarcation between the public interest served by public officials and that served by private business must not be obscured.”


Disposition-
==Disposition==
Reversed- The [[California Courts of Appeal]] reversed the summary judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendants and ruled in favor of Brownie Miller.


Reversed- The California Court of Appeals reversed the summary judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendants and ruled in favor of Brownie Miller.


[[Category:1986 in law]]

[[Category:United States tort case law]]
{{uncategorized|date=October 2008}}

Revision as of 06:46, 20 October 2008

Miller v. National Broadcasting Co. 232 Cal. Rptr 688 (1986)

Background

On October 30th, 1979 an NBC camera crew was following a group of Los Angeles Fire Department firefighters and paramedics. A call came in about a man having a heart attack. The camera crew and the paramedics rushed to the home of Brownie and Dave Miller. The camera crew, without consent from anyone, rushed into the house with the paramedics and taped footage of Mr. Dave Miller having what would be a fatal heart attack. The crew later that night would put the footage on the air, also without consent. Brownie Miller filed suit against NBC, Ruben Norte (a producer for NBC) and the city of Los Angeles for trespass, invasion of privacy infliction of emotional distress.

Does the media, even though they obtain consent from the group they are following (Police, firefighters, paramedics, etc.) have the same access privileges as the police of paramedics do if they are following them on scene?

Decision

The Court ruled, ultimately, in favor of the plaintiff on the charges of Invasion of Privacy and infliction of Emotional Distress.

Reasoning

“One seeking emergency medical attention does not thereby “open the door” for persons without any clearly identifiable and justifiable official reason who may wish to enter the premises where the medical aid is being administered…the clear line of demarcation between the public interest served by public officials and that served by private business must not be obscured.”

Disposition

Reversed- The California Courts of Appeal reversed the summary judgment of the District Court in favor of the defendants and ruled in favor of Brownie Miller.