User talk:207.80.142.5

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

21:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Candiru. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Xy7 (talk) 20:20, 16 January 2008

Your recent edit to Geometry (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vanderbilt University, you will be blocked from editing. Esrever ^(klaT) 04:22, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Joaquín Sorolla y Bastida. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of San Jacinto, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Battle of San Jacinto was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-11T18:15:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mathew Rabey, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mathew Rabey was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-02-14T17:15:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to El Greco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Salvador dali. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Salvador dali was changed by 207.80.142.5 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-03-11T18:36:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tiddly-Tom 18:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to The Third of May 1808. Tiddly-Tom 18:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

---

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Ed (Edgar181) 13:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paula Deen, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Collectonian (talk) 18:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Naruto characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 19:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to William Few has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DavidWS (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Bobby Johnson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jennavecia ^(Talk) 16:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please do not make comments directed at another editor's personal dignity as you did here. If you repeat that, I will have no choice but to restrain you from making further unhelpful edits. Jehochman ^Talk 16:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

You continued trying to harass the user, and discourage their participation in wikipedia via personal attacks. I've given you a 24 hour vacation from editing. Please consider that we are a collaborative project, not a battle zone. Jehochman ^Talk 18:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'd like to request unblock since I did not once make a personal attack. I made a comment of disapproval towards an editor's behavior, which in no way merits a block. Attempts to explain this to the blocking admin, User:Jehochman, were reverted and ignored, a classic case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. I suspect Jehochman has a WP:COI here in that he just doesn't like hearing any comment addressed towards his favorite admin User:Yannismarou that isn't "OMG IM SRRY DNT LEVE YANIS." Jehoch also failed to WP:AGF and deemed me a troll and cited WP:DENY when reverting a perfectly constructive post on his talk page that can't possibly be construed as "trolling I ask that WP:NPA reviewed and I'd also like to point out again that not once was a personal attack made. I believed Yannis' actions to be disgusting and detrimental to Wikipedia, and I stated my opinion (as other unbanned editors were already doing) on his talk page in the relevant section.

Decline reason:

Agree with block. — Cirt (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is this the only account you use to edit Wikipedia? You seem to know a lot about policy for a newcomer. Jehochman ^Talk 18:43, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Is that intended to be mocking, or are you threatening to block whatever other account I may have? 207.80.142.5 (talk)

It is a serious question. Are you using an IP account so you can attack another user while keeping your main account "clean"? Jehochman ^Talk 18:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your actions Jehochman. I reverted this user as well on Yannis' page. The proposed edit is simply unacceptable. Dr.K. (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

When somebody is feeling low, it is unacceptable to kick them, repeatedly and after being warned. Jehochman ^Talk 18:58, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Absolutely. Thanks again. Dr.K. (talk) 05:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Reblocked

I have reblocked this account, because it returned to the activities that got it blocking the first place. Additionally, this account is being used to evade a block that was placed on the user's main account. Talk to me before considering any unblocks. I am intentionally not connecting this IP to the main account in public. Jehochman ^Talk 14:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The edit* which I was blocked for is an encouraging message. It is not uncivil, it is not harassment, it is being genuinely nice. Jehochman didn't seem to consider this, and just decided to block me for even editing a talk page, probably assuming my edit was bad. If one argument can be made for the comment's apparent inappropriateness, I'll back off, but so far all I've gotten are template warnings and a "I agree with the block," which doesn't help me at all. By the way, the only reason I'm using this account is because A) the block on it ran out and B) I didn't want to leave on a negative note, and felt like I should have put a nicer thing on the talk page. I did so, and now I'm being crucified for being a nice guy. Sorry. Oh, and I can't talk to Jehochman before considering an unblock because he was so quick to block me, meaning I can't edit his talk page.

Decline reason:

Considering the tone of the message that got this IP blocked in the first place, the latest message comes off sounding entirely insincere and rather smarmy. That, in conjunction with the block evasion, calls for the IP to remain blocked. —Travis^talk 19:44, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(* that edit is here) (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.80.142.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I shouldn't be blocked because some editors thought that a genuine, honest post was sarcastic. It's a lose-lose situation for me: if I'm sarcastic, I'm banned. If I'm honest, I'm seen as sarcastic and banned.

Decline reason:

Your requests for unblock have already been made, twice, and declined. Responsible administrators have reviewed the case, and upheld the decision. Please do not continue to make unblock requests; they will be denied. — Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion is not allowed, whether you are sarcastic or sincere. Jehochman ^Talk 20:13, 20 October 2008 (UTC)