Talk:Guatemalan Air Force: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:29, 23 October 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guatemalan Air Force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation Stub‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Central America Stub‑class

	Central America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Central America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Lockheed T-33 / Douglas C-47

Just a quick note: The Guatemalan Air Force is no longer operating the Lockheed T-33 and the Douglas C-47 / DC-3 types. There are surviving examples of both but those are not in service. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.57.97.252 (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

This article contains several negative POV and unreferenced statements. BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sex Joke

Is this article just a big sex joke? I doubt any of this is verifiable information. Humorous though.

Fidelity axiom (talk) 18:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 == POV ==
 This article contains several negative POV and unreferenced statements. [[User:BatteryIncluded|BatteryIncluded]] ([[User talk:BatteryIncluded|talk]]) 02:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
+== Sex Joke ==
+Is this article just a big sex joke? I doubt any of this is verifiable information. Humorous though.
+ [[User:Fidelity axiom|Fidelity axiom]] ([[User talk:Fidelity axiom|talk]]) 18:29, 23 October 2008 (UTC)