Arthropod eye: Difference between revisions
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
}}</ref> The eyes are strikingly different from the myriapods, which were traditionally considered to be a sister group to the hexapoda. |
}}</ref> The eyes are strikingly different from the myriapods, which were traditionally considered to be a sister group to the hexapoda. |
||
Ocelli were probably present in the last common arthropod ancestor, and may be apomorphic with ocelli in other phyla |
Ocelli were probably present in the last common arthropod ancestor, and may be apomorphic with ocelli in other phyla,<ref name=Bitsch2005/> such as the annelids.<ref name=Paulus2000>{{citation |
||
| last = Paulus | first = H.F. |
|||
| year = 2000 |
|||
| title = Phylogeny of the Myriapoda-Crustacea-Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure* |
|||
| journal = Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research |
|||
| volume = 38 |
|||
| issue = 3 |
|||
| pages = 189–208 |
|||
| doi = 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2000.383152.x |
|||
}}</ref> Median ocelli are present in chelicerates and mandibulates; lateral ocelli are also present in chelicerates.<ref name=Bitsch2005>{{citation |
|||
| last1 = Bitsch | first1 = C. |
| last1 = Bitsch | first1 = C. |
||
| last2 = Bitsch | first2 = J. |
| last2 = Bitsch | first2 = J. |
Revision as of 19:28, 24 October 2008
This article or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This article was last edited by Smith609 (talk | contribs) 16 years ago. (Update timer) |
The arthropods ancestrally possessed compound eyes, but the type and origin of this eye varies between groups, and some taxa have secondarily developed simple eyes. The organ's development through the lineage can be estimated by comparing stem groups such as the onychophora and Limulus to the crown group condition.
Apposition eyes are the most common form of eye, and are presumably the ancestral form of compound eye. They are found in all arthropod groups, although they may have evolved more than once within this phylum.[1] Some annelids and bivalves also have apposition eyes. They are also possessed by Limulus, the horseshoe crab, and there are suggestions that other chelicerates developed their simple eyes by reduction from a compound starting point.[1] (Some caterpillars appear to have evolved compound eyes from simple eyes in the opposite fashion.)
Eyes and functions
Most arthropods have at least one of two types of eye: lateral compound eyes, and smaller median ocelli.[2] The two eye types are used in concert, because each has its own advantage.[3] Insects can function perfectly well with either type of eye surgically removed, but the two types combine to give better performance.[3] Ocelli can detect lower light levels,[note 1][4] and have a faster response time, while compound eyes are better at detecting edges and objects.[3]
Evolution
Hexapods are currently thought to fall within the Crustacean crown group; while molecular work paved the way for this association, their eye morphology and development is also markedly similar.[5] The eyes are strikingly different from the myriapods, which were traditionally considered to be a sister group to the hexapoda.
Ocelli were probably present in the last common arthropod ancestor, and may be apomorphic with ocelli in other phyla,[6] such as the annelids.[7] Median ocelli are present in chelicerates and mandibulates; lateral ocelli are also present in chelicerates.[6]
Origin
No fossil organisms have been identified as similar to the last common ancestor of arthropods; hence the eyes possessed by the first arthropod remains a matter of conjecture. The largest clue into their appearance comes from the onychophorans: a stem group lineage that diverged soon before the first true arthropods. The eyes of these creatures are attached to the brain using nerves which enter into the centre of the brain, and there is only one area of the brain devoted to vision. This is similar to the wiring of the median ocelli (small simple eyes) possessed by many arthropods; the eyes also follow a similar pathway through the early development of organisms. This suggests that onychophoran eyes are derived from simple ocelli, and the absence of other eye structures implies that the ancestral arthropod lacked compound eyes, and only used median ocelli to sense light and dark.[2] However, a conflicting view notes that compound eyes appeared in many early arthropods, including the trilobites and eurypterids, suggesting that the compound eye may have developed after the onychopohran and arthropod lineages split, but before the radiation of arthropods.[6] This view is supported if a stem-arthropod position is supported for compound-eye bearing Cambrian organisms such as the Anomalocaridids.
There were probably only a single pair of ocelli in the arthropod concestor; Cambrian lobopod fossils display a single pair, and while many arthropods today have three, four, or even six, the lack of common pathway suggests that a pair is the most probable ancestral state. The crustaceans and insects mainly have three ocelli, suggesting that such a formation was present in their concestor.[2]
It is deemed probable that the compound eye arose as a result of the 'duplication' of individual ocelli.[6] In turn, the disperseal of compound eyes seems to have created large networks of seemingly independent eyes in some arthropods, such as the larvae of certain insects.[6] In some other insects and myriapods, lateral ocelli appear to have arisen by the reduction of lateral compound eyes.[6]
Trilobite eyes
The eyes of trilobites were of two forms, both of which grew by the addition of new ommatidia at the bottom of the eye, a row at a time. This growth form is today unique to the horseshoe crabs. The holochroal eye, consisting of many small lenses, appears to be the ancestral state. The more complex schizochroal eye was more derived.[5]
Limulus
Limulus, the horseshoe crab, has traditionally been used in investigations into the eye, because it has relatively large ommatidia with large nerve fibres (making them easy to experiment on). It also falls in the stem group of the chelicerates; its eyes are believed to represent the ancestral condition because they have changed so little over evolutionary time. Indeed the horseshoe crabs are often considered to be living fossils. Most other living chelicerates have lost their lateral compound eyes, evolving simple eyes in their place.[8]
Limulus has two large compound eyes on the sides of its head. An additional simple eye is positioned at the rear of each of these structures.[8] In addition to these obvious structures, it also has two smaller ocelli situated in the middle-front of its carapace, which may superficially be mistaken for nostrils.[8] A further simple eye is located beneath these, on the underside of the carapace.[8] A further pair of simple eyes are positioned just in front of the mouth.[8] The simple eyes are probably important during the embryonic or larval stages of the organism, with the compound eyes and median ocelli becoming the dominant sight organisms during adulthood.[8] These ocelli are less complex, and probably less derived, than those of the mandibulata.[6] Unlike the trilobites', the compound eyes of Limulus are triangular in shape; they also have a generative region at their base, but this elongates with time. Hence the one ommatidium at the apex of the triangle was the original "eye" of the larval organism, with subsequent rows added as the organism grew.[5]
Insects & Crustaceans
These two groups are probably monophyletic; their eyes certainly develop in a very similar fashion. Their larvae only possess a pit-eye ocellus, termed Bolwig's organ. The compound eyes of adults develop in a separate region of the head.[5] New ommatidia are added in semicircular rows at the rear of the eye; during the first phase of growth, this leads to individual ommatidia being square, but later in development they become hexagonal. The hexagonal pattern will only become visible when the carapace of the stage with square eyes is molted.[5]
Myriapods
Most myriapods bear stemmata - that is, single lensed eyes which evolved by the reduction of a compound eye.[6] However, the genus Scutigera has secondarily re-evolved a compound eye composed of repeated stemmata.[7] These appear to grow in rows which are inserted between existing rows of ocelli.[5]
Notes
- ^ They are about 5000 times more sensitive than compound eyes. They can, for instance, respond to the position of the full moon
References
- ^ a b
M F Land; R D Fernald (1992). "The Evolution of Eyes". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 15: 1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.15.030192.000245.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Mayer, G. (2006), "Structure and development of onychophoran eyes: What is the ancestral visual organ in arthropods?", Arthropod Structure and Development, 35 (4): 231–245, doi:10.1016/j.asd.2006.06.003
- ^ a b c Taylor, Charles P. (1981), "Contribution of compound eyes and ocelli to steering of locusts in flight. I. Behavioural analysis", J Exp Biol: 1–18
- ^ Wilson, M. (1978), "The functional organisation of locust ocelli", Journal of Comparative Physiology (4): 297–316
- ^ a b c d e f Harzsch, S.; Hafner, G. (2006), "Evolution of eye development in arthropods: Phylogenetic aspects", Arthropod Structure and Development, 35 (4): 319–340, doi:10.1016/j.asd.2006.08.009
- ^ a b c d e f g h Bitsch, C.; Bitsch, J. (2005), "Evolution of eye structure and arthropod phylogeny", Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships
- ^ a b Paulus, H.F. (2000), "Phylogeny of the Myriapoda-Crustacea-Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure*", Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research, 38 (3): 189–208, doi:10.1046/j.1439-0469.2000.383152.x
- ^ a b c d e f Battelle, B.A. (2006). "The eyes of Limulus polyphemus (Xiphosura, Chelicerata) and their afferent and efferent projections". Arthropod structure & development. 35 (4): 261–74. doi:10.1016/j.asd.2006.07.002. ISSN 1467-8039. PMID 18089075.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help)