Jump to content

Computational neuroscience: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Destexhe (talk | contribs)
45 edits
Destexhe (talk | contribs)
45 edits
Line 120: Line 120:
* [http://www.iccn2007.org/ International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics (ICCN)]{{ndash}} a yearly conference.
* [http://www.iccn2007.org/ International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics (ICCN)]{{ndash}} a yearly conference.
* [http://www.icms.org.uk/workshops/mathneuro UK Mathematical Neurosciences Meeting]{{ndash}} a new yearly conference, focused on mathematical aspects.
* [http://www.icms.org.uk/workshops/mathneuro UK Mathematical Neurosciences Meeting]{{ndash}} a new yearly conference, focused on mathematical aspects.
* [http://www.neurocomp.fr/index.php?page=welcome The NeuroComp Conference]{{ndash}} a yearly computational neuroscience conference (France)


===Websites===
===Websites===

Revision as of 17:28, 27 October 2008

Computational neuroscience is an interdisciplinary science that links the diverse fields of neuroscience, cognitive science, electrical engineering, computer science, physics and mathematics. Historically, the term was introduced by Eric L. Schwartz, who organized a conference, held in 1985 in Carmel, California at the request of the Systems Development Foundation, to provide a summary of the current status of a field which until that point was referred to by a variety of names, such as neural modeling, brain theory and neural networks. The proceedings of this definitional meeting were later published as the book "Computational Neuroscience", MIT Press(1990). The early historical roots of the field can be traced to the work of people such as Hodgkin & Huxley, Hubel & Wiesel, and David Marr, to name but a few. Hodgkin & Huxley developed the voltage clamp and created the first mathematical model of the action potential. Hubel & Wiesel discovered that neurons in primary visual cortex, the first cortical area to process information coming from the retina, have oriented receptive fields and are organized in columns (Hubel & Wiesel, 1962). David Marr's work focused on the interactions between neurons, suggesting computational approaches to the study of how functional groups of neurons within the hippocampus and neocortex interact, store, process, and transmit information. Computational modeling of biophysically realistic neurons and dendrites began with the work of Wilfrid Rall, with the first multicompartmental model using cable theory.

Computational neuroscience is distinct from psychological connectionism and theories of learning from disciplines such as machine learning, neural networks and statistical learning theory in that it emphasizes descriptions of functional and biologically realistic neurons (and neural systems) and their physiology and dynamics. These models capture the essential features of the biological system at multiple spatial-temporal scales, from membrane currents, protein and chemical coupling to network oscillations, columnar and topographic architecture and learning and memory. These computational models are used to test hypotheses that can be directly verified by current or future biological experiments.

Currently, the field is undergoing a rapid expansion. There are many software packages, such as GENESIS and NEURON, that allow rapid and systematic in silico modeling of realistic neurons. Blue Brain, a collaboration between IBM and École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, aims to construct a biophysically detailed simulation of a cortical column on the Blue Gene supercomputer.

Organizations

The Organization for Computational Neuroscience is a non-profit organization one of whose tasks is to organize the annual international Computational Neuroscience meeting.

Major topics

Research in computational neuroscience can be roughly categorized into several lines of inquiries. Most computational neuroscientists collaborate closely with experimentalists in analyzing novel data and synthesizing new models of biological phenomena.

Single-neuron modeling

Main article: Biological neuron models

Even single neurons have complex biophysical characteristics. Hodgkin and Huxley's original model only employed two voltage-sensitive currents, the fast-acting sodium and the inward-rectifying potassium. Though successful in predicting the timing and qualitative features of the action potential, it nevertheless failed to predict a number of important features such as adaptation and shunting. Scientists now believe that there are a wide variety of voltage-sensitive currents, and the implications of the differing dynamics, modulations and sensitivity of these currents is an important topic of computational neuroscience (for reference, see Johnston and Wu, 1994).

The computational functions of complex dendrites are also under intense investigation. There is a large body of literature regarding how different currents interact with geometric properties of neurons (for reference, see Koch, 1998).

Some models are also tracking biochemical pathways at very small scales such as spines or synaptic clefts.

Development, axonal patterning and guidance

How do axons and dendrites form during development? How do axons know where to target and how to reach these targets? How do neurons migrate to the proper position in the central and peripheral systems? How do synapses form? We know from molecular biology that distinct parts of the nervous system release distinct chemical cues, from growth factors to hormones that modulate and influence the growth and development of functional connections between neurons.

Theoretical investigations into the formation and patterning of synaptic connection and morphology is still nascent. One hypothesis that has recently garnered some attention is the minimal wiring hypothesis, which postulates that the formation of axons and dendrites effectively minimizes resource allocation while maintaining maximal information storage. (for a review, see Chklovskii, 2004)

Sensory processing

Early models of sensory processing understood within a theoretical framework is credited to Horace Barlow. Somewhat similar to the minimal wiring hypothesis described in the preceding section, Barlow understood the processing of the early sensory systems to be a form of efficient coding, where the neurons encoded information which minimized the number of spikes. Experimental and computational work have since supported this hypothesis in one form or another.

Current research in sensory processing is divided among biophysical modelling of different subsystems and more theoretical modelling function of perception. Current models of perception have suggested that the brain performs some form of Bayesian inference and integration of different sensory information in generating our perception of the physical world.

Memory and synaptic plasticity

Main article: Synaptic plasticity

Earlier models of memory are primarily based on the postulates of Hebbian learning. Biologically relevant models such as Hopfield net have been developed to address the properties of associative, rather than content-addressable style of memory that occur in biological systems. These attempts are primarily focusing on the formation of medium-term and long-term memory, localizing in the hippocampus. Models of working memory, relying on theories of network oscillations and persistent activity, have been built to capture some features of the prefrontal cortex in context-related memory. (For review, see Durstewitz et al, 2000)

One of the major problems in biological memory is how it is maintained and changed through multiple time scales. Unstable synapses are easy to train but also prone to stochastic disruption. Stable synapses forget less easily, but they are also harder to consolidate. One recent computational hypothesis involves cascades of plasticity (Fusi et al, 2005) that allow synapses to function at multiple time scales. Stereochemically detailed models of the acetylcholine receptor-based synapse with Monte Carlo method, working at the time scale of microseconds, have been built (Coggan et al, 2005). It is likely that computational tools will contribute greatly to our understanding of how synapses function and change in relation to external stimulus in the coming decades.

Behaviors of networks

Biological neurons are connected to each other in a complex, recurrent fashion. These connections are, unlike most artificial neural networks, sparse and most likely, specific. It is not known how information is transmitted through such sparsely connected networks. It is also unknown what the computational functions, if any, of these specific connectivity patterns are.

The interactions of neurons in a small network can be often reduced to simple models such as the Ising model. The statistical mechanics of such simple systems are well-characterized theoretically. There have been some recent evidence that suggests that dynamics of arbitrary neuronal networks can be reduced to pairwise interactions (Schneidman et al, 2006; Shlens et al, 2006.) It's unknown, however, whether such descriptive dynamics impart any important computational function. With the emergence of two-photon microscopy and calcium imaging, we now have powerful experimental methods with which to test the new theories regarding neuronal networks.

While many neuro-theorists prefer models with reduced complexity, others argue that uncovering structure function relations depends on including as much neuronal and network structure as possible. Models of this type are typically built in large simulations platforms like GENESIS or Neuron. There have been some attempts to provide unified methods that bridge, and integrate, these levels of complexity (Eliasmith & Anderson, 2003).

Cognition, discrimination and learning

Computational modeling of higher cognitive functions has only begun recently. Experimental data comes primarily from single-unit recording in primates. The frontal lobe and parietal lobe function as integrators of information from multiple sensory modalities. There are some tentative ideas regarding how simple mutually inhibitory functional circuits in these areas may carry out biologically relevant computation (Machens et al, 2005).

The brain seems to be able to discriminate and adapt particularly well in certain contexts. For instance, human beings seem to have an enormous capacity for memorizing and recognizing faces. One of the key goals of computational neuroscience is to dissect how biological systems carry out these complex computations efficiently and potentially replicate these processes in building intelligent machines.

Consciousness

The ultimate goal of neuroscience is to be able to explain the every day experience of conscious life. Francis Crick and Christof Koch made some attempts in formulating a consistent framework for future work in neural correlates of consciousness (NCC), though much of the work in this field remains speculative. (for a review, see Koch and Crick, 2003). Another attempt is done by Andrew & Alexander Fingelkurts: they are developing the Operational Architectonics theory of brain-mind functioning. This theory treats consciousness as a biological phenomenon in the brain which is realized by the highly organized macro-level electrophysiological (EEG) phenomena (metastable operational modules), which are brought to existence by the coordinated electrical activity (operational synchrony) of many neuronal populations dispersed throughout the brain (for a review see Fingelkurts An. A. and Fingelkurts Al. A., 2001; 2004; 2006).

See also

References

  • Chklovskii DB (2004). "Synaptic connectivity and neuronal morphology: two sides of the same coin". Neuron. 43 (5): 609–17. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.012. PMID 15339643.
  • Sejnowski, Terrence J.; Churchland, Patricia Smith (1992). The computational brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-03188-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Anderson, Charles H.; Eliasmith, Chris (2004). Neural Engineering: Computation, Representation, and Dynamics in Neurobiological Systems (Computational Neuroscience). Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-55060-1.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Coggan JS, Bartol TM, Esquenazi E; et al. (2005). "Evidence for ectopic neurotransmission at a neuronal synapse". Science (journal). 309 (5733): 446–51. doi:10.1126/science.1108239. PMID 16020730. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Abbott, L. F.; Dayan, Peter (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-04199-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Durstewitz D, Seamans JK, Sejnowski TJ (2000). "Neurocomputational models of working memory". Nat. Neurosci. 3 Suppl: 1184–91. doi:10.1038/81460. PMID 11127836.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA (2001). "Operational architectonics of the human brain biopotential field: towards solving the mind-brain problem". Brain and Mind. 2 (3): 261–96. ISSN 1389-1987.
  • Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA (2004). "Making complexity simpler: multivariability and metastability in the brain". Int. J. Neurosci. 114 (7): 843–62. doi:10.1080/00207450490450046. PMID 15204050.
  • Fingelkurts AA, Fingelkurts AA (2006). "Timing in cognition and EEG brain dynamics: discreteness versus continuity". Cogn Process. 7 (3): 135–62. doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0035-0. PMID 16832687.
  • Fusi S, Drew PJ, Abbott LF (2005). "Cascade models of synaptically stored memories". Neuron. 45 (4): 599–611. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.001. PMID 15721245.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Wu, Samuel Miao-sin; Johnston, Daniel (1995). Foundations of cellular neurophysiology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-10053-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952). "A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve". J. Physiol. (Lond.). 117 (4): 500–44. PMC 1392413. PMID 12991237.
  • Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962). "Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex". J. Physiol. (Lond.). 160: 106–54. PMC 1359523. PMID 14449617.
  • Koch, Christof (1999). Biophysics of computation: information processing in single neurons. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-510491-9.
  • Crick F, Koch C (2003). "A framework for consciousness". Nat. Neurosci. 6 (2): 119–26. doi:10.1038/nn0203-119. PMID 12555104.
  • Machens CK, Romo R, Brody CD (2005). "Flexible control of mutual inhibition: a neural model of two-interval discrimination". Science (journal). 307 (5712): 1121–4. doi:10.1126/science.1104171. PMID 15718474.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • William Bialek; Rieke, Fred; David Warland; Rob de Ruyter van Steveninck (1999). Spikes: exploring the neural code. Cambridge, Mass: MIT. ISBN 0-262-68108-0.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Schneidman E, Berry MJ, Segev R, Bialek W (2006). "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population". Nature. 440 (7087): 1007–12. doi:10.1038/nature04701. PMC 1785327. PMID 16625187.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • Schwartz, Eric (1990). Computational neuroscience. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-19291-8.
  • Schutter, Erik de (2001). Computational neuroscience: realistic modeling for experimentalists. Boca Raton: CRC. ISBN 0-8493-2068-2.
  • Sejnowski, Terrence J.; Hemmen, J. L. van (2006). 23 problems in systems neuroscience. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-514822-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Books

  • Eric L. Schwartz, ed.: Computational Neuroscience, MIT Press, 1990, ISBN 0-262-19291-8.

Journals

Software

  • Genesis, a general neural simulation system
  • Neurospaces, an efficient neural simulation system that uses software engineering principles from the industry.
  • HNeT, Holographic Neural Technology.
  • Neuron, a neural network simulator
  • NEST, a simulation tool for large neuronal systems.
  • Neuroconstruct, software for developing biologically realistic 3D neural networks.
  • Neurofitter, a parameter tuning package for electrophysiological neuron models.
  • Neurojet, a neural network simulator specialized for the hippocampus
  • HHsim, a neuronal membrane simulator
  • MCell, A Monte Carlo Simulator of Cellular Microphysiology
  • Emergent, neural simulation software
  • Python tools : http://neuralensemble.org/

Conferences

Websites

Courses

Research groups

Papers

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Computational_neuroscience&oldid=248015700"