Jump to content

Template talk:SEPTA: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fern Rock, anyone?: new section
m TWP
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TrainsWikiProject|class=template|subway=yes}}
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=NA}}
{{WikiProject Philadelphia|class=NA}}



Revision as of 19:15, 30 October 2008

WikiProject iconTrains: Rapid transit Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
WikiProject iconPhiladelphia Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hey, I love this template and thanks for adding it! But surely the subway-surface lines belong on here as well? I'd add them, but I'm not sure what "division" they're in. --Jfruh 13:05, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I knew i forgot something. --Boothy443 | comhrÚ 18:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SEPTA R4

This template deals with the SEPTA Regional Rail lines in their present form. The R4 line was proposed as a local service from Bryn Mawr but never implemented. That's why the R4 should not be in the template. Pilatus 13:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the history is much more complicated - SEPTA Regional Rail describes it in detail. There's no reason to restrict the template to the present form. --SPUI (talk) 07:55, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have defunct lines (such as the trackless trolleys) in the template, so there is no reason to have lines that never existed in the template. Pilatus 00:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If someone writes an article on the trackless trolley routes, they shoudl be added to the template. --SPUI (talk) 06:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If someone gets around to write about the R4 the link can go back in. Pilatus 23:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Removed the R4 link. If someone writes about the proposed R4 service (if I remember correctly, it was a Bryn Mawr-Fox Chase local) then the link should be added back. Izzycat 22:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Girard St.?

Should the Girard_Street_line be on this template? --Jfruh 06:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Probley, have to figure out how i am going to work it in. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 07:24, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fern Rock, anyone?

So why isn't Fern Rock Transportation Center included in this template? And about the R4, I found a message board containing some useful info in case any body's interested. ----DanTD (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]