User talk:Renamed user e8LqRIqjJf2zlGDYPSu1aXoc

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Level 3

Moderate to high level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

---

5.22 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 15:10, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Reverted Edit

You reverted my vandalism in seconds. That was fast, in fact, I was in the middle of reverting it myself.78.16.186.38 (talk) 19:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Well honestly, how long do you expect an edit like that to stand? —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

i take it it's on your watchlist then. I really should get an account.Captain Ingold (planned username) (For Gondor!) 19:04, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Nope, we just have good anti-vandalism tools these days. Huggle, for example. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I know what Huggle is, but it's such an un-antivandalism word! Stop right there! This is the HUGGLE!!78.16.186.38 (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I'd tend to agree with you; Smackle or Revertex might be a bit more suitable, but I digress. Back to work. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:09, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Have a nice day. Amn't I such a polite vandal.78.16.186.38 (talk) 19:10, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

Hello, you sent me a note about a discussion. I'm embarrass to say, I cannot locate the discussion. Can you please guide me. Thank you.--RexerX (talk) 15:25, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, the discussion has since been archived, and can be found here. While I'm not here to comment on the veracity of the claims made in that discussion, seeing as no actions were taken against you, you can pretty safely ignore it for the time being. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the direction. I think I'd rather steer clear of that mess and will circle around should I see anything brewing or if help is needed with edits, protocol, etc. --RexerX (talk) 03:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Like I said, I wouldn't worry too much, but all the same it's better to take extra care while working on articles when some of the current editors are embroiled in controversy. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 12:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Deal W. Hudson

You've recently edited this page. If you care to, would you please join the discussion I've tried to start on the talk page there. Thanks. Best, David in DC (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't think I will participate. My edit was only as a vandalfighting measure using Huggle; IsleofPatmos had blanked the page, and as he wasn't the page creator, it struck me as vandalism. Beyond that, I don't have any interest in the topic, and am a bit too busy to get involved there anyway. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 03:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Disagree - Contact info for problems

I don't understand why important & verifiable information can not be included in the discussion of a subject.

I don't want to step on your toes - please don't get me wrong - I simply disagree (and I can argue 4 sides of a 2 sided argument....)

I believe you've either made an invalid deletion and/or pointed me to a reference which doesn't relate to the deletion.

I argue that the "..not a directory" paragraph is not applicable here as the information I provided is not for sales, advertising or conducting general business and thus I believe the information should not be censored.

Agree/Disagree/Get an admin involved?

I saw that you've lost a member of your family - please accept my sympathy and understanding and also note that this is not an urgent issue.

I also saw your interest in something dear to me - chow chow - good luck with this subject as members of my family can't even agree on the ingredients.

Many thanks, Somethingshiny Somethingshiny (talk) 14:43, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I've replied on your talk page. Thanks again for your kind words- I appreciate it. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 15:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for returning the favor and reverting my user talk page. Best. --Igoldste (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

School page

We are teachers and students of the Spackenkill Union Free School District that are attempting to edit and add information that is factual to our school pages on Wikipedia. A user named smartyllama who we suspect is a high school student is vandalizing our efforts. Is there some way to block him from our pages? October 30, 2008 Shsvitek (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Smartyllama's edits are not vandalism, but yours may be. Please read some of the links I've put on your user talk page before continuing to edit that article, particularly about maintaining a neutral point of view and the manual of style. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 18:39, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Feder campaign

Why did you remove my post about the Feder campaign. This is fact and is a very vaid point. Ms. Feder's campaign has started robocalling as of Thursday 30 OCT. Today's robocall was "Have you seen the Thursday Washinton Post?" and continues for about 1 minute and a half. While the democrats demanded McCain stop robocalls and Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle referred to it as the dying gasps of the McCain Campaign one of their own, who is presently behind in the pools 42% to 47% is using it as a tactic to bolster what some would call a losing or dying campaign. The 5% margin is the closest that Wolf has ever faced in an election. Flyguybob (talk)flyguybob 10-30-2008 15:12

The fact that you received robocalls yourself is not a valid source, and constitutes original research. That's why. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Adding host

You just added the host to an IP that belongs to the American University in Cairo - presumably I should have done that, but why should it be done? I still have a lot to learn about this side of things. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 21:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

To tell you the truth, I just did it because the "host" field is available for that template. It's probably unnecessary, but it feels more "complete" with the hostname in there. :-) —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 21:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

OK, thanks, you are probably right. Doug Weller (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem

Some people... lol Sionus [talk] 22:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

English Americans

Seems you like to EDIT.

My source was good enough, yet you found it unconstructive.

Please define unconstructive.....

When It is fact that almost 3.5 million English people emigrated to the US from England since 1776. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.131.151 (talk) 22:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, honestly I was reverting on the assumption that the previous people who reverted you were correct. It wasn't initially clear that you were trying to provide a source for the article; it looked more like you were just dropping a link to some external site in the middle of the text. You might want to check out WP:CITE for how to cite sources better in articles. Thanks! —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks, Mendaliv, for reverting vandalism to my user page. Cheers, JNW (talk) 23:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to have helped. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 23:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Drudge report

Stop unfairly moderating the Drudge Report page to suit your own opinions. When somebody rightfully changes the page to make it more accurate you call it vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.121.169 (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I have no opinion on the Drudge Report. Your contribution is vandalistic in that it removes sourced, substantive content from an article without any attempt at discussion on the article talk page. I have yet again reverted your removal of content. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 16:12, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Are you kidding me? The sources are absurd. Have you even clicked on them? They provide nothing of any substance. I think you need to do some homework. 24.187.121.169 (talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not involved in that article. What does matter here is that you've continued to remove content which other uses had re-added without attempting to start a discussion. Now that you have done so at the appropriate talk page, I think things will be better. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

If you're not involved in that article why do you continuously undo edits and cite vandalism without looking into it. Shouldn't you know something about the article before you do that? Also notice the 3rd "source" takes you to some website's main page. 24.187.121.169 (talk) 20:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)