User talk:Weeliljimmy

CHERUB Vandalism

You removed the "Vandalism" but didn't fix the page which I put it there to get noticed for. Maybe you can go and fix it too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CHERUB --68.42.4.156 (talk) 01:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I removed what appeared to be vandalism. However, I won't improve the content of the article, if that's what you asked for. Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not asking to improve the content. I don't edit on wikipedia so I don't mess with formatting tags and all that crap, however the format was broken so I figured I would just do a nonsense edit knowing someone would catch it and see the note to fix it. --68.42.4.156 (talk) 01:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

The best thing to do is to talk about it on the page's Discussion/Talk page, or to do it yourself (be bold) Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Wasn't going to edit it myself because I would probably do more damage to it then good. As for talking about it on the Discussion/Talk page, do people watch it for edits like they do the main articles? I could put a note there and it could not be seen for ages if they don't monitor them. They need a report as broken button to alert other wiki regular editors that a page is broken like that so casual browsers can alert to a page being broken and in need of a quick fix. --68.42.4.156 (talk) 01:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Well, "If you see something that can be improved, improve it!" If you end up screwing up the article or whatever, you can go back in the history and undo. Wikipedia survives if people go out and improve articles, not just talking about improving them. Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Trials2secondedition.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Trials2secondedition.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Taken care of Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Tamil Azhagiya Magan

dear Wheeljimmy I'm writing to you regarding the following page Wikipedia - Use don't AbUse which was previously named Tamil Azhagiya Magan, some people have been abusing the thier right to create pages, this page is an unwanted page, if you ask me why? it's complicated, if you are Asian, then it's easy for you to understand, but if you are any race other than asian, the it will take time to understand. In south part of India Chennai, there are two actors called Joseph Vijay and Ajith Kumar, the problem is the followers of these actors, they are vicious and they want to insult each other's heroes no matter what, these people are narrow minded, this page is one such step to insult the actor Joseph Vijay created by one of the followers of Ajith Kumar. So I tried to edit the content but such the changes did not happen, moreover i moved the page to stop such actions, so I was hoping that you could delete the page, because i don't know how to perform such action. Please don't hesitate to contact me regarding this matter.

Thank You Sunil Aravindakshan (talk)

Sorry, that's not (to my knowledge) a good reason to delete the page. Feel free to ask a Wikipedia administrator for more details, they should have the answers. Weeliljimmy ^talk 22:41, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

I left a message on Ohana United's page

It was a comment and you deleted it. Nurasko (talk)00:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, it was an accident on my part :S Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Did you place it back?(I just noticed it was still there, did you perhaps place the notice by accident?) Nurasko (talk)00:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

I placed your comment back (undid my own edit) and removed the warning I placed on your page. I thought it was on the article, not the talk page. Weeliljimmy ^talk 01:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)