Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ubuntu Eee/archive1: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Ubuntu Eee: he wanted it to seem that way |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Oppose''' - Perhaps this user neglected to read the [[WP:FA?|featured article criteria]]? (Note: His username is the same as the developer's last name.) [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 20:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' - Perhaps this user neglected to read the [[WP:FA?|featured article criteria]]? (Note: His username is the same as the developer's last name.) [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 20:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
:*Actually, it isn't. <nowiki>[[User:Ramvi|Jon Blund]] ([[User talk:Ramvi|talk]])''</small></nowiki> He just wanted it to appear that way for some reason. —[[User:Mattisse|<font color="navy">'''Mattisse'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Mattisse|Talk]]) 00:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Oppose''' - this is a timewaster. 280 words, nominator has 0 edits on en-Wikpedia. There are better uses for FAC time.[[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 01:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' - this is a timewaster. 280 words, nominator has 0 edits on en-Wikpedia. There are better uses for FAC time.[[User:Brianboulton|Brianboulton]] ([[User talk:Brianboulton|talk]]) 01:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose/Procedural close'''. This article is nowhere close to being comprehensive or well-written. - [[Special:Contributions/131.211.151.245|131.211.151.245]] ([[User talk:131.211.151.245|talk]]) 07:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose/Procedural close'''. This article is nowhere close to being comprehensive or well-written. - [[Special:Contributions/131.211.151.245|131.211.151.245]] ([[User talk:131.211.151.245|talk]]) 07:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:52, 14 November 2008
Toolbox |
---|
I'm nominating this article for featured article Jon Blund (talk) 18:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - If this was an RfA, I'd say NOTNOW. But, article needs a lot of work before FA is even considered. D.M.N. (talk) 18:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - Perhaps this user neglected to read the featured article criteria? (Note: His username is the same as the developer's last name.) Awadewit (talk) 20:00, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, it isn't. [[User:Ramvi|Jon Blund]] ([[User talk:Ramvi|talk]])''</small> He just wanted it to appear that way for some reason. —Mattisse (Talk) 00:52, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - this is a timewaster. 280 words, nominator has 0 edits on en-Wikpedia. There are better uses for FAC time.Brianboulton (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose/Procedural close. This article is nowhere close to being comprehensive or well-written. - 131.211.151.245 (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- The above anon comment is mine. I forgot to log in. - Mgm|(talk) 13:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)