Wikipedia talk:Deletion reform/Proposals/Uncontested deletions: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) formating to avoid a poll at this stage |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==General Comments== |
|||
==Support== |
|||
Good idea. No code changes needed. Let's do it. [[User:JesseW/sig|JesseW, the juggling janitor]] 19:34, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
Good idea. No code changes needed. Let's do it. [[User:JesseW/sig|JesseW, the juggling janitor]] 19:34, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Sounds like a good way to make the process more efficient, while not causing any problems. [[User:Bluemoose|<font color=darkgreen>'''''Martin'''''</font>]] 21:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
Sounds like a good way to make the process more efficient, while not causing any problems. [[User:Bluemoose|<font color=darkgreen>'''''Martin'''''</font>]] 21:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
==Changes== |
|||
==How long should the time be?== |
|||
Revision as of 21:25, 10 October 2005
General Comments
Good idea. No code changes needed. Let's do it. JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:34, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Yes. This also avoids the problem with proposals for early AFD closing - that some people may not show up until late, or some good argument may not be made until too late. ~~ N (t/c) 20:16, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
Sounds like a good way to make the process more efficient, while not causing any problems. Martin 21:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)