Talk:List of WWE personnel: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:31, 22 November 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of WWE personnel article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

This professional wrestling article is a frequent target for editors to add a week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not, and consider whether your additions to this article will serve to make the article larger and harder to edit for style, clarity, and grammar.

Professional wrestling List‑class Mid‑importance

	List of WWE personnel is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Table

Change it back to the list,is is so stupid and takes longer to change and edit stuff here

My vote is to change it back.

Agrees:

2

Disagrees:

0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oreius (talk • contribs) 04:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This vote is not going to matter. It is against WP:CONSENSUS. The tables stay either way.--WillC 06:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will is correct. The tables need work in my opinion but the list was sloppy. Hazardous Matt 13:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Recon the table should Show Real Name, Ring Name, Billed Height, Billed Weight, Billed From and Notes --WWE FanaWwe.fana (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Like This[reply]

Real Name	Ring Name	Billed Weight	Billed Height	Billed From	Notes
David Bautista	Batista	290 lb	6'6	Washington, DC

Why?--WillC 01:05, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's some seriosuly irrelevent information. I would really like to understand what is wrong with the current format. It's simple, easy to read, and to the point. I originally was against the whole tables thing, but I have to admit, I really do think the page is better than ever. And on top of it, it's not THAT much harder to edit at all. Somebody who dislikes the format seriously needs to step up and state exactly what the problem with it is. If they are unable to do that, this argument should be put to rest for good. Dahumorist (talk) 01:14, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why Not --Wwe.fana (talk) 06:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Changing it anyway --Wwe.fana (talk) 06:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only if a consensus is formed on this matter. I would hate for this article to be fully protected again.--WillC 06:39, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just please sort by real name. Not ringnames. It is too hard with the current format. It's way morw accurate to use the real names then basically a nickname. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.27.1.21 (talk) 02:36, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

actually WP:CONSENSUS change see Wikipedia:CONSENSUS#Consensus can change.

Yes it can, but that is really referring to a consensus formed a while ago. This was a few weeks ago. iMatthew 13:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

so how long do we have to wait? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.65.17.56 (talk) 13:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For...? iMatthew 13:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Grisham

Todd is also Raw Backstage interviewer. If you do deside to put with his name put it under Notes.

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 so how long do we have to wait?  <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.65.17.56|75.65.17.56]] ([[User talk:75.65.17.56|talk]]) 13:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :For...? <span style="font-family: verdana">'''[[User:iMatthew|<span style="color:#900">iMa<span style="color:#090">tth<span style="color:#4682b4">ew</span>]]'''</span> 13:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
+==Todd Grisham==
+Todd is also Raw Backstage interviewer. If you do deside to put with his name put it under Notes.