User talk:Happydude 69ya

Sweet!

Remember to smile and get out and do something on this wonderful day typing all day is bad..sun is good...people are too for talking too just an idea

Welcome

• Welcome!

Hello, Happydude 69ya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:26, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

What a day!

		The Original Barnstar
		For just being you day after day Happydude 69ya (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		and making the day fun Happydude 69ya (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		What a day Happydude 69ya (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Block

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 48 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Please note that deleting warnings does not remove them, and adding spurious block notices is also easily detectable and is regarded as vandalism. Awarding yourself barnstars is allowed, but is essentially without value. When your block expires please either edit responsibly or not at all. --Anthony.bradbury^[[User

talk:Anthony.bradbury|"talk"]] 21:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happydude 69ya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I dont mind being blocked in some cases. But I think my edits were not that bad. If you look at them they get progressively better. Sure i put a block tag on user pages that were vandalizing and thats not my job to do so, but i also put it on my page as well (more of an edit test there). After recieveing only one warning I began to do better edits. I think this is nothing more than biting me as a new comer, spreading joy and happiness shouldnt be stopped should it? Boy I feel unloved by anthoney he/she could have at least made better encouragment on how to better edit not just ban me right away out the door. Am i not suppose to reward people out of good nature? what am i to do?

Decline reason:

Adding false block notices and barnstars to dozens of user talk pages for no discernible reason is disruptive. Once your block expires, please do something useful. —  Sandstein  21:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Happydude 69ya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

two block notices to users who were doing vandalism who likely will never use wikiepedia again isnt that bad, especially considering thats how i thought it worked. Spreading happy barnstars of joy to other users is not a form a vandalism. Its easy to search templates for them on wikipedia and discover them, as far as i can see here you guys are just biting new comers, you wonder why people vandalize, this is exactly why people get upset with wikipedia, you try to do something nice fight vandalism and give awards and two admins take offence to that, look at my edits they were improving as I went, and Im at least making an effort to contest this, which is more than i can say about other people who get blocked. All Im saying is lighten up a bit and give some new comers a break instead of biting them all the time, obviously it happens a lot cause theres a whole page for it.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=two block notices to users who were doing vandalism who likely will never use wikiepedia again isnt that bad, especially considering thats how i thought it worked. Spreading happy barnstars of joy to other users is not a form a vandalism. Its easy to search templates for them on wikipedia and discover them, as far as i can see here you guys are just biting new comers, you wonder why people vandalize, this is exactly why people get upset with wikipedia, you try to do something nice fight vandalism and give awards and two admins take offence to that, look at my edits they were improving as I went, and Im at least making an effort to contest this, which is more than i can say about other people who get blocked. All Im saying is lighten up a bit and give some new comers a break instead of biting them all the time, obviously it happens a lot cause theres a whole page for it. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=two block notices to users who were doing vandalism who likely will never use wikiepedia again isnt that bad, especially considering thats how i thought it worked. Spreading happy barnstars of joy to other users is not a form a vandalism. Its easy to search templates for them on wikipedia and discover them, as far as i can see here you guys are just biting new comers, you wonder why people vandalize, this is exactly why people get upset with wikipedia, you try to do something nice fight vandalism and give awards and two admins take offence to that, look at my edits they were improving as I went, and Im at least making an effort to contest this, which is more than i can say about other people who get blocked. All Im saying is lighten up a bit and give some new comers a break instead of biting them all the time, obviously it happens a lot cause theres a whole page for it. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=two block notices to users who were doing vandalism who likely will never use wikiepedia again isnt that bad, especially considering thats how i thought it worked. Spreading happy barnstars of joy to other users is not a form a vandalism. Its easy to search templates for them on wikipedia and discover them, as far as i can see here you guys are just biting new comers, you wonder why people vandalize, this is exactly why people get upset with wikipedia, you try to do something nice fight vandalism and give awards and two admins take offence to that, look at my edits they were improving as I went, and Im at least making an effort to contest this, which is more than i can say about other people who get blocked. All Im saying is lighten up a bit and give some new comers a break instead of biting them all the time, obviously it happens a lot cause theres a whole page for it. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Aw shucks!

Heck Anto - he awarded me one as well. I think this guy should be cut some slack. I mean, how can a Newbie know the rules? You haven't so much bitten this guy as eaten him! Sarah777 (talk) 21:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

It seems odd that a new user can find block templates and barnstars so quickly. — Ѕandahl ♥ 20:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)