Transversal (combinatorics): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Reverted edits by 66.44.246.135 to last version by Booyabazooka (HG) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
{{Combin-stub}} |
{{Combin-stub}} |
||
fuck you |
Revision as of 01:35, 12 December 2008
This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.(September 2008) |
In combinatorial mathematics, given a collection C of sets, a transversal is a set containing exactly one element from each member of the collection: it is a section of the quotient map induced by the collection. If the original sets are not disjoint, there are several different definitions. One variation is that there is a bijection f from the transversal to C such that x is an element of f(x) for each x in the transversal. A less restrictive definition requires that the transversal just has a non-empty intersection with each member of C.
Examples
As an example of the disjoint-sets meaning of transversal, in group theory, given a subgroup H of a group G, a right (respectively left) transversal is a set containing exactly one element from each right (respectively left) coset of H.
Given a direct product of groups , then H is a transversal for the cosets of K, and conversely.
- The marriage theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions for possibly overlapping subsets to have a transversal.
References
- Mirsky, Leon (1971). Transversal Theory: An account of some aspects of combinatorial mathematics. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-498550-5.