Talk:Love Com: Difference between revisions
m Automatically assessing importance as low per WP:ANIME/ASSESS |
Update project assessment per Tag & Assess 2008, please help |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Film|class=Stub|Japanese-task-force=yes}} |
{{Film|class=Stub|Japanese-task-force=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Anime and manga|importance=low| |
{{WikiProject Anime and manga |
||
|importance=low| |
|||
class=C |b1=n |b2=y |b3=n |b4=y |b5=n |b6=y |
|||
}} |
|||
== Anime adaptation == |
== Anime adaptation == |
||
Revision as of 21:47, 13 December 2008
 | Film: Japanese Stub‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Anime and manga C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Anime adaptation
I've seen announcements that an anime version will come out in February 2007. Can someone add the info when it's out? Ninja neko 21:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Seiko-chan
I believe there's a wikipedia rule that people should be referred as to their identified gender, and so the section on Seiko-chan should probably use only female pronouns. 69.12.130.234 07:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Format for episode lists
You may want to take note of {{Japanese episode list}} for formatting the episode list; parameters are listed on the talk page, and you can see it in action, for ex, here. For the Japanese titles, ANN has a list. —Quasirandom (speak) 21:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Having an option to add summaries for each episode can spawn a lot of overly detailed plot descriptions though... Ninja neko (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it can. Generally, you want to keep them to a couple sentences. Fortunately, the template makes it looks obviously bad when the summary goes on too long. —Quasirandom (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, I've converted the list over to the template. If summaries are added and get to long, well, that becomes an consensus editing issue. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Info of note
Viz plans to release the live action movie in English in 2008: http://www.popcultureshock.com/our-favorite-manga-of-2007/43033/
The English manga was a top editor's pick at popcultureshock.com: http://www.popcultureshock.com/our-favorite-manga-of-2007/43033/
Mentioned in passing in case someone else has a chance to add these to the article before I do. The latter could make the start of a Reception section, collecting reviews and awards notice. —Quasirandom (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Which two I've now added, along with another review. Need more! more! (And then after that, we can start working on a section on influences on the series. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Removing the extra cover
Given to the Foundation's edict to use as little non-free/fair-use media in Wikipedia as possible, I'm removing the cover of volume 16. The current guidelines are to have only one for the series and to combine as many character portraits as possible, and given the current one in the infobox has both Risa and Otani, having another just for Otani is superfluous. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Movie review
In case someone gets a chance to use this before I do, here's a link to a review of the movie. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Move to Love*Com?
Viz and Madman both call it Love*Com. The movie is Love Com the Movie. The Japanese covers call it Rabu★Con (ラブ★コン). The covers disambigiuate it with "Lovely*Complex" (or sometimes "Lovely♥Complex"), but all indications are that the official title really is Love*Com and not Lovely Complex. Thus, I think this page needs to be moved to the correct title. Any objections? —Quasirandom (talk) 02:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)