User talk:Gavia immer/Archive 3: Difference between revisions
Gavia immer (talk | contribs) →Redirect: I won't contest it |
No edit summary |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
I undid the redirect you put into [[User:Main page]] because when a page is redirected to the main page, it is difficult to access the redirect page. Second of all, it is not likely to be a useful redirect because it is only used about 8 times a month and it is a highly unlikely search term. -- [[User:IRP|IRP]] [[User talk: IRP|☎]] 16:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
I undid the redirect you put into [[User:Main page]] because when a page is redirected to the main page, it is difficult to access the redirect page. Second of all, it is not likely to be a useful redirect because it is only used about 8 times a month and it is a highly unlikely search term. -- [[User:IRP|IRP]] [[User talk: IRP|☎]] 16:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Ah, well, I'm not going to contest it. It's not a huge deal either way. However, I do think it's useful, if only marginally so. Moreover, I generally don't see the point of ancient sockpuppet tags for weel-known vandals; it's not as if they actually do anything. Nonetheless, as I said, I won't contest it. <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User:Gavia immer|Gavia immer]] </span> 16:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
:Ah, well, I'm not going to contest it. It's not a huge deal either way. However, I do think it's useful, if only marginally so. Moreover, I generally don't see the point of ancient sockpuppet tags for weel-known vandals; it's not as if they actually do anything. Nonetheless, as I said, I won't contest it. <span style="white-space:nowrap">— [[User:Gavia immer|Gavia immer]] </span> 16:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
Nanotechnology Fail-Safes Page |
|||
The page that you have edited is our college project. May I ask why have you taken our pictures down, taken off our survey and edited our redirects? We need all of these parts for the next 4 months. Could you please fix the changes that you have made because this is effecting our project. |
|||
We are WPI students (www.wpi.edu) and if you have any concerns, please contact us at nanoiqp@gmail.com ASAP. |
|||
Thank you, |
|||
Nano Fail-Safe IQP team |
Revision as of 22:26, 14 December 2008
Previous discussion is archived at User talk:Gavia immer/Archive 1 and User talk:Gavia immer/Archive 2
Rubicante
Hi, unsure what you are trying to do with this redirect but it now redirects to itself. Keith D (talk) 23:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- I fixed it. Thanks for catching my screwup. That's what happens when you press Control-V without looking, I guess. — Gavia immer 14:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Redirect
I undid the redirect you put into User:Main page because when a page is redirected to the main page, it is difficult to access the redirect page. Second of all, it is not likely to be a useful redirect because it is only used about 8 times a month and it is a highly unlikely search term. -- IRP ☎ 16:15, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, well, I'm not going to contest it. It's not a huge deal either way. However, I do think it's useful, if only marginally so. Moreover, I generally don't see the point of ancient sockpuppet tags for weel-known vandals; it's not as if they actually do anything. Nonetheless, as I said, I won't contest it. — Gavia immer 16:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Nanotechnology Fail-Safes Page
The page that you have edited is our college project. May I ask why have you taken our pictures down, taken off our survey and edited our redirects? We need all of these parts for the next 4 months. Could you please fix the changes that you have made because this is effecting our project.
We are WPI students (www.wpi.edu) and if you have any concerns, please contact us at nanoiqp@gmail.com ASAP.
Thank you,
Nano Fail-Safe IQP team