Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/SavetheArchduke

User:SavetheArchduke

Suspected sockpuppeteer

SavetheArchduke (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Gonçalo-Manuel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Report submission by

Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 18:48, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

• Nominating all the same articles for deletion as the user which was just blocked for disruptive editing.
• Just confirmed that it is indeed him with this edit.
• They both end their posts with an exclamation mark and 3 dots aswell. See [1] and [2].

Comments

Just because I give reason to someone that doesn't mean I'm the same person. I just wanted to do my job. I followed those editings and I simply agreed, sometimes just partially, with the criteria for deletion or of non notability. How can you accuse someone just for saying what I said, I mean, I tried to justify myself and I was accused???... What part of my justification says that I am the same person? How can you even say that? How can you conclude for me saying that I just want to do something that the other guy is my puppet? Intelligent conclusion, no doubt!... SavetheArchduke (talk) 11:18, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

We both end posts with !... Now that's a smart argument! SavetheArchduke (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Obvious sockpuppet - using multiple accounts to avoid scrutiny of the attempts to get these actors' articles deleted. —BradV 20:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Obvious in your twisted basic mind! I was tracking the guy, and since I had some other pages which deletion I wanted to propose or at least suggest in order to force some improvements, I just agreed with some of those deletions. Beside, I didn't delete any filmography. SavetheArchduke (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Conclusions

---