Talk:Witness immunity: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Requested Move: support |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The title of this article is misleading and mistakes two distinct legal concepts. "Prosecutorial immunity" refers to the qualified immunity prosecutors receive for official acts (in the same way "[[judicial immunity]]" refers to the immunity enjoyed by judges), not a witness' immunity ''from'' prosecution. To correct this confusion, I propose moving this article to "Immunity from prosecution" and redirecting "Prosecutorial immunity" to "qualified immunity."-[[User:PassionoftheDamon|PassionoftheDamon]] ([[User talk:PassionoftheDamon|talk]]) 00:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
The title of this article is misleading and mistakes two distinct legal concepts. "Prosecutorial immunity" refers to the qualified immunity prosecutors receive for official acts (in the same way "[[judicial immunity]]" refers to the immunity enjoyed by judges), not a witness' immunity ''from'' prosecution. To correct this confusion, I propose moving this article to "Immunity from prosecution" and redirecting "Prosecutorial immunity" to "qualified immunity."-[[User:PassionoftheDamon|PassionoftheDamon]] ([[User talk:PassionoftheDamon|talk]]) 00:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' move and redirect. "Prosecutorial immunity" is ambiguous at best. "Immunity from prosecution" is clearer. [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC) |
*'''Support''' move and redirect. "Prosecutorial immunity" is ambiguous at best. "Immunity from prosecution" is clearer. [[User:Station1|Station1]] ([[User talk:Station1|talk]]) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''' The article title is a mistake. [[User:Joeldl|Joeldl]] ([[User talk:Joeldl|talk]]) 07:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:21, 21 December 2008
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
Law Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Requested Move
The title of this article is misleading and mistakes two distinct legal concepts. "Prosecutorial immunity" refers to the qualified immunity prosecutors receive for official acts (in the same way "judicial immunity" refers to the immunity enjoyed by judges), not a witness' immunity from prosecution. To correct this confusion, I propose moving this article to "Immunity from prosecution" and redirecting "Prosecutorial immunity" to "qualified immunity."-PassionoftheDamon (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support move and redirect. "Prosecutorial immunity" is ambiguous at best. "Immunity from prosecution" is clearer. Station1 (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
- Support The article title is a mistake. Joeldl (talk) 07:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)