Talk:Torksey Castle: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:34, 21 December 2008

Edits

what are you describing as Peacok , I am also sorry you think there is a copyright issue, but the article was rewritten, not a composite copy. I also feel you are missing out a great deal of factual information, through your rewrite, and also I do not feel your version is very Gramitical, nor do I believe it even conforms to as you say to the "style manual", afterall there are great many articles written like mine, and there has bnever been a issue over it. Whatsmore what you describe as Peacock terms, are infact, facts, they explain, the lack of uncertainty, and offer reasoned conjectures, that infact are common amongst Architectural history and terminology.

Redpathanderson - hey, it's good to meet you. Could you detail your issues with my edits? - I would like to have this article conform to our layout guidelines and style manual, along with such policies as avoid peacock terms. Thanks --Neutrality^talk 05:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I looked at the external links [1] and [2] and there are several passages given verbatim without quotation marks or other attribution in the article, which is certainly a copyright violations...This needs to be addressed and I think my edits go a little bit toward doing that (although now that I am aware of these sources, I'll work on sourcing and eliminating the copyvio). Neutrality^talk 05:13, 20 December 200

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Edits==
+what are you describing as Peacok , I am also sorry you think there is a copyright issue, but the article was rewritten, not a composite copy.
+I also feel you are missing out a great deal of factual information, through your rewrite, and also I do not feel your version is very Gramitical, nor do I believe it even conforms to as you say to the "style manual", afterall there are great many articles written like mine, and there has bnever been a  issue over it.
+Whatsmore what you describe as Peacock terms, are infact, facts, they explain, the lack of uncertainty, and offer reasoned conjectures, that infact are common amongst Architectural history and terminology.
 [[User:Redpathanderson|Redpathanderson]] - hey, it's good to meet you. Could you detail your issues with my edits? - I would like to have this article conform to our [[Wikipedia:Layout|layout guidelines]] and [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|style manual]], along with such policies as [[Wikipedia:Avoid peacock terms|avoid peacock terms]]. Thanks --[[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 05:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
-:Also, I looked at the external links [http://www.lincsheritage.org/community_heritage/guides_information/treasure_trove/article.php?id=18] and [http://www.castleuk.net/castle_lists_midlands/121/torkseycastle.htm] and there are several passages given verbatim without quotation marks or other attribution in the article, which is certainly a [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violations]]...This needs to be addressed and I think my edits go a little bit toward doing that (although now that I am aware of these sources, I'll work on sourcing and eliminating the copyvio). [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 05:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
+:Also, I looked at the external links [http://www.lincsheritage.org/community_heritage/guides_information/treasure_trove/article.php?id=18] and [http://www.castleuk.net/castle_lists_midlands/121/torkseycastle.htm] and there are several passages given verbatim without quotation marks or other attribution in the article, which is certainly a [[Wikipedia:Copyright violations|copyright violations]]...This needs to be addressed and I think my edits go a little bit toward doing that (although now that I am aware of these sources, I'll work on sourcing and eliminating the copyvio). [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 05:13, 20 December 200