Serial verb construction: Difference between revisions
m conflating identical references; rm superfluous br tags |
Javier Carro (talk | contribs) →External links: +cat |
||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
[[de:Serialverbkonstruktion]] |
[[de:Serialverbkonstruktion]] |
||
[[Category:Syntax]] |
|||
Revision as of 11:20, 24 December 2008
The serial verb construction, also known as (verb) serialization, is a syntactic phenomenon common to many African, Asian and Guinean languages. Contrary to subordination, where one clause is embedded into another, verb serialization strings two verbs together in a sequence in which no verb is subordinated to the other[1].
The phenomenon
The following example of serialization comes from Nupe:
(1) Musa bé lá èbi.
Musa came took knife
"Musa came to take the knife."[1]
In the English translation, the verb "came" takes an infinitival complement headed by the infinitive "to take". In the Nupe original, however, the two verbs are in the same clause, forming a sole predicate.
Serial verb constructions exhibit the following recurrent properties:
(i) Strings of serial verbs share the same subject.
(ii) Subject Agreement is often cross-referenced on the two verbs.
(2) nu-takasã nu-dúmaka (Bare) 1SG-deceived 1SG-sleep "I pretended (that) I was asleep."[1]
In other cases, there is only a subject marker, but it is shared by the two verbs, as in the following example from Yoruba.
(3) ó mú ìwé wá
3SG took book came
"He brought the book."[1]
Both verbs are understood as third person singular.
(iii) The only constituent that can intervene between the two verbs is the object of one of them, and only in a subset of serial verb languages - cf. example (3).
(iv) There is only one negation marker for the whole construction.
(4) hena nihiwawaka nu-tšereka nu-yaka-u abi (Bare) NEG 1SG:go 1SG-speak 1SG-parent-FEM with "I am not going to talk with my mother."[1]
(v) Serial verbs cannot be marked independently for tense/aspect/mood categories. Either the relevant (identical) markers appear on both verbs, or a sole marker is shared by them (as they can share a subject marker, cf. example 3).[1]
Notes
Despite the frequency of the phenomenon, it should be noted that there is no standard view on the proper analysis of serial verb constructions. This is a current subject of debate among syntacticians.
As Tallerman (1998) points out, the serial verb construction is not totally unfamiliar to speakers of English, and can be found in some expressions surviving from Early Modern English, such as Let's go eat.[1]