Talk:Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Difference between revisions
Chris45215 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I would like to propose splitting this article in two articles, one for the dominant form and one for the recessive form. The two forms are quite different from each other and I think it is probably confusing to describe them both in one article. --[[User:Wouterstomp|WS]] 00:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
I would like to propose splitting this article in two articles, one for the dominant form and one for the recessive form. The two forms are quite different from each other and I think it is probably confusing to describe them both in one article. --[[User:Wouterstomp|WS]] 00:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 23:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC) |
:Done. --[[User:Arcadian|Arcadian]] ([[User talk:Arcadian|talk]]) 23:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC) |
||
The page for the Dominant form of the disease is much more descriptive and complete than this page, and this page gives the impression that it is the only wikipedia page on the subject (I would not have found the page for the Dominant form without checking the discussion). |
|||
I recomend either removing this page and directing users to a disambiguation page, or re-merging the Dominant and Recessive pages. Failing that, a recomendation to go to the Dominant page (or Recessive page) should be prominently placed, to help users find the information they want.[[User:Chris45215|Chris45215]] ([[User talk:Chris45215|talk]]) 02:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:16, 26 December 2008
To-do list is empty: remove {{To do}} tag or click on edit to add an item. |
 | Medicine B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Splitting article in dominant and recessive
I would like to propose splitting this article in two articles, one for the dominant form and one for the recessive form. The two forms are quite different from each other and I think it is probably confusing to describe them both in one article. --WS 00:55, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Done. --Arcadian (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The page for the Dominant form of the disease is much more descriptive and complete than this page, and this page gives the impression that it is the only wikipedia page on the subject (I would not have found the page for the Dominant form without checking the discussion). I recomend either removing this page and directing users to a disambiguation page, or re-merging the Dominant and Recessive pages. Failing that, a recomendation to go to the Dominant page (or Recessive page) should be prominently placed, to help users find the information they want.Chris45215 (talk) 02:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)