Talk:Noel Edmonds

Talk Page Archives

Fair use rationale for Image:DealUKLogo.jpg

Image:DealUKLogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

4th person to reach 1000 appearances on television

"He became the 4th television personality to reach 1000 career appearances on the television, joining Terry Wogan, Mr Blobby and Richard Hammond which he said was the greatest moment in his career along with watching people win big on Deal or No Deal. "

I have difficulty believing this. What about all the newsreaders of the 50 and 60s who were on our screens every night?

How can Hammond possibly have made more appearances than Richard Baker?

Noel Edmonds (Deal or no Deal UK) TV license revolt

Noel understands the utter crap BBC television has become. In sapping £143 per annum (quote, source) from an each TV watching UK citizen for no reward. BBC programs are a specialised commodity. That would be good if you could see them they are in such short supply and your palette on BBC is destroyed by BBC promotion; it's destroyed by BBC affiliated cronies advertising the BBC, on such a mouthpiece of BBCthought (tm). Noel is right to be disgusted that the vast majority I hope of right thinking subscribers to game shows and pap that he was involved with should object to paying for the whole medium of television and the fact that they are told to fund the whole medium through the auspices of the BBC. It is pure misrepresentation. People need to think about the amount of guts it took to make the stand that "our Noel" has taken against corporate influence and the supposed responsibility of the "British Broadcasting Company". NO! we cry and we delight in a broadcaster who supports us. (Member periodically of the British television watching public aware of license inspectors and their abject hate and dirty tricks). They're on commission aren't they. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.119.22 (talk) 05:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Noel Edmonds (Deal or no Deal UK) TV license revolt

Noel understands nothing. He became rich off the BBC abd revolts against them. He produces poor TV incl. house party for the BBC, if he had such a regard for the licencE paYer, why Did he continue with house party, taking the licences payers' money?

Television Career

Quote from 'Television Career' section in the article: "Noel now produces many more programmes and is amazingly generous." - What is that sentence doing there and supposed to mean?!