User talk:SimonKSK/Sandbox/Undertaker/CD!

Hey Simon :) This will actually be fun :D Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I just thought this explained his deadman gimmick more clearly. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, well I thought we could move the Paul Bearer stuff. The last two paragraphs maybe? Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Move it where? Simon_K^S_K 21:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, just remove it from the article. You said find some things that aren't important and I thought since that was already kind of mentioned (though not as clearly in my opinion). I liked the Paul Bearer info because The Undertaker's character kind of has a background from childhood and teen years but I rather have the stuff up above and that's the most insignificant thing in my mind. Hey! I like your version, but check out this version out in a couple of seconds to the article and tell me what you think. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:26, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

A lot of the stuff about his trademarks are not needed, like the Tombstone thing. It's all mentioned. Simon_K^S_K 21:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Simon, I feel that's way too short and you're getting rid of a lot of pivotal information? I feel your last edit is totally unreasonable. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Your right, it is short. the druids should go back, but some of this stuff is really just trivia. Man, this can take a while. Simon_K^S_K 21:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

lol! At least we can revert as much as we please so I'm really enjoying myself even if it will take awhile. :D Yea, but I understand where you're coming from. Hey, I also remember you criticized the Creatures of the Night. I just wanted to tell you that he used to call his fans Creatures of the Night in the purple outfit. Either that or 'Grim Reaper deadman' but that just sounds weird. Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I removed the entrance info. How about how it looks now? Cheers_Dude (talk) 21:54, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Why are you switching up the titles dude? I thought we were going to discuss everything here before we started making edits on The Undertaker article. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

speciatly matches are trivial. No consensus was really formed. Simon_K^S_K 22:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

"Gimmick" seems better. you really don't have to put in deadman. It's in the article. Simon_K^S_K 22:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

When this was open for debate for weeks no one objected to it, but simply argued for the inclusion of Hell in a Cell, including yourself. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Why just gimmick as it could be confused with his American Badass gimmick Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

then change it to Gimmicks and we will add the ABA. Simon_K^S_K

Ok, but I didn't watch wrestling during the ABA years so I couldn't really say anything about that. I stopped in 2000 and continued back up in 04'. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Easy, we fork it out of the section. Simon_K^S_K 22:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't want to help with ABA though. I don't really like ABA. It's not a gimmick I'm interested in. It's cool if you like it but... Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Ew man, do you really like that better than what I had? Mine was detailed leaving a reader with lot's of information on his main gimmick, but I guess it's only fair to have both gimmicks when I really think about it. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't like but it'sthe MoS! Simon_K^S_K 22:30, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

military occupational specialty? Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:32, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Manual of Style. >_> Simon_K^S_K 22:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I wish we could have kept it the way I had it but you really want to go with this version? I just still feel like I did a lot of work for nothing with that last version. I wish you would have communicated with me for the month I made changes instead of bringing your concerns to my attention when I was pretty much done. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but you should have read this. Simon_K^S_K 22:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Now I am getting pissed. There is NO need for the teleportation. The cutting throat and knee thing is not needed. It is a pose and trivial. Simon_K^S_K 22:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't see what rule I broke by adding this deadman section. That article really emphasizes not adding week by week info in wrestling biographies. It doesn't say you can't describe the gimmick. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

No, it's the style in which you wrote it in. Alright, I hate this, but I'm taking this to someone else to see what they think. Simon_K^S_K 22:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Please remain civil. That teleportation edit has been there for over a year. Haven't you read this article in the past? Take it to someone else and someone biased might I add? You tried to take it to one of your wikifriends before so they would agree with you. Cheers_Dude (talk) 22:51, 3 January 2009 (UTC)