Talk:Science in the Age of Enlightenment: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:12, 10 January 2009

Science in the Age of Enlightenment is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 21, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

History of Science B‑class High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

History B‑class Mid‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology B‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Additional disciplines

If anyone would like to tackle biology, botany, medicine, mathematics, geology, etc., these are some recommended general references that I used:

General introductions:

Burns, William E. 2003. Science in the Enlightenment. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
--Has information on all relevant disciplines, the major players of each, and contains bibliographical references for further reading.

McClellan, James Edward and Harold Dorn (2006). Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction. JHU Press.
--Standard 'Introduction to the History of Science' textbook. Good place to start. It's cheap too.

Porter, Roy, ed. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
--Heavier text than the other two, but also contains a lot more information. Volume four is specifically about 18th c. science. I would recommend this text over McClellan and Dorn, but it's a good companion to Burns.

If anyone requires additional sources for a specific discipline, feel free to ask. It would be nice to see this article become either a good or featured article. Poor 18th c. science gets no love. Carpe Carpio (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 {{WikiProject Sociology|class=B|importance=Low|nested=yes}}
 }}
+== Additional disciplines ==
+If anyone would like to tackle biology, botany, medicine, mathematics, geology, etc., these are some recommended general references that I used:
+General introductions:
+Burns, William E. 2003. Science in the Enlightenment. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.<BR>
+--Has information on all relevant disciplines, the major players of each, and contains bibliographical references for further reading.
+McClellan, James Edward and Harold Dorn (2006). Science and Technology in World History: An Introduction. JHU Press. <BR>
+--Standard 'Introduction to the History of Science' textbook. Good place to start. It's cheap too.
+Porter, Roy, ed. 2003. The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<BR>
+--Heavier text than the other two, but also contains a lot more information. Volume four is specifically about 18th c. science. I would recommend this text over McClellan and Dorn, but it's a good companion to Burns.
+If anyone requires additional sources for a specific discipline, feel free to ask. It would be nice to see this article become either a good or featured article. Poor 18th c. science gets no love.
+[[User:Carpe Carpio|Carpe Carpio]] ([[User talk:Carpe Carpio|talk]]) 12:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)