Talk:Open Season (2006 film): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:05, 13 January 2009

Albums Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Film Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Info on the Plot needed on this article

There needs to be a plot section in the article, and due to the website, the plot could be this

"Boog is a domestic bear living with Park Ranger Beth, who raised the bear, in Timberline. Timberline's bully is the uber hunter Shaw, who one day has Elliott straped to the front of his truck. Boog rescues him and that night, Elliott plans to break him out. The animals get into the forest and later become lost as Beth searches for the bear, as open season starts to arrive, Boog and Elliott must forget their differences and bond with all the forest animals to team up against Shaw, this includes Ian the Military Deer, Reilly the constructionist beaver, panicky rabbits, hot tempered skunks, McSquizzy and his nut throwing squirell gang, a porcupine, and phsycotic ducks to force the hunter out."

This is the plot and I got this from the film's official website. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.245.200.128 (talk • contribs) .

( I apologize if this is in the wrong place. ) "Grey squirrels are indigenous to North America, so the Scottish accent portrayed by all of the squirrels is an anomaly. " Is this quote from the page really nessicary. Squirells do not speak with an accent, this is assanine.

The above is another sickening example of a wikipedia editor clucking their dissatisfaction, and ruffling their tail feathers over humour which IS allowed in wikipedia. --84.70.216.224 21:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracies

I'm removing the inaccuracies section, for the following reasons:

1) List may become too long. It doesn't stop at those few things; animals can't wage organized war against humans, can't speak English, deers can't stick their head in gumball machines, etc.

2) Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Just because it's true that these are inaccurate, doesn't mean they deserve to be mentioned on Wikipedia.

3) Bugs Bunny's article, or any other Looney Tunes character article for that matter, doesn't have a pointless list of inaccuracies on how animals can't walk upright, speak English, etc. If someone were to try and attempt this, it would get reverted almost immediately.

4) It's a computer animated cartoon! Obviously it has inaccuracies! No need to list them one by one.

Any objections should be stated here BEFORE reverting my change. SuperDT 23:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, all the "inaccuracies" you listed were OBVIOUS! No one doesn't know animals don't speak English! But not everyone is as good as separating fact from fiction like you. Some still think porcupines shoot quills and that brown bears are the biggest carnivores. Those should be listed, for we don't want people to take movies too literally. Anyways, looks at Ice Age, Ice Age 2, The Land Before Time, Finding Nemo, etc. They all have inaccuracies sections, so why shouldn't this one? Dora Nichov 01:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... I stand corrected. SuperDT 02:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Dora Nichov 07:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy protection

Anybody have any idea what the copy protection scheme is? Since it's a Sony film, I immediately assumed it was ARccOS, but from what I can tell it's different than the standard ARccOS scheme. According to the ARccOS article, Sony quit using ARccOS last February. But I'm wondering if this means they've just made a new and improved version of it. Maybe this discussion should go there, actually. --W0lfie 23:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swear word

On the DVD of it, if you go to the menu screen (where it has PLAY, Chapter selections etc..) and leave it for a while, the characters go on talking. During this, i thought i heard one of the characters say "Fuck". I'm not sure whether its right or not.--Sha0000 09:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You must have been mistaking [and I probably just mispelled that]But I think he said yuck

squeal

Does anyone know if a squeal is in development —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.197.103 (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashkrules (talk • contribs) 16:39, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
-== Favorite Character==
-Who's your favorite character in the film?  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.81.96.139|70.81.96.139]] ([[User talk:70.81.96.139|talk]]) 20:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
-Boog  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/67.141.27.119|67.141.27.119]] ([[User talk:67.141.27.119|talk]]) 16:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->