Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Londonistan (term): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:58, 16 January 2009

Nothing more than a dictionary definition (WP:DICDEF) which I don't see evolving beyond that (Islam in London covers the subject of well, Islam in London). Wiktionary already has an entry (wiktionary:Londonistan) Equendil Talk 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. —Equendil Talk 21:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep! I've heard this term before in conversation and it may have legs and may be much more than a neologism. Let's see what sources are out there on the name from other editors.Critical Chris (talk) 23:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DICDEF. Just because you have heard of the term doesn't mean it needs an article. Tavix (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in line with Helengrad and other disparaging but notably sourced sobriquets for places. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 02:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sufficient sources exist to allow creation of an article. No causes presented for deletion. WilyD 12:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Delete''' per [[WP:DICDEF]]. Just because you have heard of the term doesn't mean it needs an article. '''[[User:Tavix|Tavix]]''' [[User talk:Tavix|(talk)]] 00:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' in line with [[Helengrad]] and other disparaging but notably sourced sobriquets for places. [[User:Carlossuarez46|Carlossuarez46]] ([[User talk:Carlossuarez46|talk]]) 02:29, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' - sufficient sources exist to allow creation of an article.  No causes presented for deletion. [[User:WilyD|Wily]]<font color="FF8800">[[User talk:WilyD|D]]</font> 12:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)