Talk:Touching the Void (book): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 203.27.145.127 - "→Opinions?: " |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot |
It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.27.145.127|203.27.145.127]] ([[User talk:203.27.145.127|talk]]) 06:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 06:01, 21 January 2009
Film Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Last names, please
A note to editors of this and any similar articles: When referring to a person by one name, please use their last name, per usual encyclopedia style, not their first name. - dcljr (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Opinions?
The second paragraph of the "Controversy" section is total bunk. It is not based on fact, it is based on opinion; why then is it is an encyclopedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LightingNerd (talk • contribs) 02:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the above - have tagged for NPOV 81.107.42.98 (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.27.145.127 (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)