Jump to content

Talk:Touching the Void (book): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 203.27.145.127 - "Opinions?: "
Line 15: Line 15:




It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot
It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/203.27.145.127|203.27.145.127]] ([[User talk:203.27.145.127|talk]]) 06:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 06:01, 21 January 2009

WikiProject iconFilm Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.
Note icon
This article needs an appropriate infobox template.

Last names, please

A note to editors of this and any similar articles: When referring to a person by one name, please use their last name, per usual encyclopedia style, not their first name. - dcljr (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions?

The second paragraph of the "Controversy" section is total bunk. It is not based on fact, it is based on opinion; why then is it is an encyclopedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LightingNerd (talkcontribs) 02:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above - have tagged for NPOV 81.107.42.98 (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


It has a place in an encyclopedia, opinions form the basis of the controversy, but that there is a controversy presumably is a fact? D. Talbot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.27.145.127 (talk) 06:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]