Talk:International Aerial Robotics Competition: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:53, 22 January 2009

Robotics B‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology Unassessed

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

GA nomination, question

This article has been nominated at GAN by an editor who appears to have carried out only two small edits. Do the main contributors agree that it meets the good article criteria, and are they happy for the nomination to go ahead? --Malleus Fatuorum 18:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I am concerned, Proceed. Firewall (talk) 20:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then to complete the nomination you need to add {{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection at GAN where the article is listed}} to the top of this talk page. --Malleus Fatuorum 20:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 This article has been [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AGood_article_nominations&diff=265749783&oldid=265748873 nominated at GAN] by an editor who appears to have carried out only two small edits. Do the main contributors agree that it meets the [[WP:WIAGA|good article criteria]], and are they happy for the nomination to go ahead? --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 18:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 :As far as I am concerned, Proceed.  [[User:Firewall|Firewall]] ([[User talk:Firewall|talk]]) 20:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
-::OK, then to complete the nomination you need to add <nowiki>{{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection on this page where the article is listed}} </nowiki> to the top of this talk page. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
+::OK, then to complete the nomination you need to add <nowiki>{{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection at GAN  where the article is listed}} </nowiki> to the top of this talk page. --[[User:Malleus Fatuorum|Malleus]] [[User_talk:Malleus_Fatuorum|Fatuorum]] 20:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)