Jump to content

User talk:Giants27: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 3d) to User talk:Iamawesome800/Archive 3.
No edit summary
Line 110: Line 110:


<small>Delivered at 04:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by <font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>'''&nbsp;<small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small></small>
<small>Delivered at 04:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by <font color="green">[[User:ShepBot|'''§hepBot''']]</font>'''&nbsp;<small>(<font color="red">[[User talk:ShepBot|Disable]]</font>)'''</small></small>

==Rex Ryan==
He had accepted the job when I changed his page. It's all irrelevant now though. --[[User:GroundhogTheater|GroundhogTheater]] ([[User talk:GroundhogTheater|talk]]) 17:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:37, 26 January 2009

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 227 0 0 100 Open 17:20, 25 December 2024 15 hours no report
This user talk page has been vandalized 3 times.


I can't count

It's true! neuro(talk) 00:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe it.

There is consensus at the talk page that this RfA should not be closed per NOTNOW/SNOW. Why do you ignore it? That's disruptive. — Aitias // discussion 00:57, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my bad, never looked, just figured it was the editcounter.--Iamawesome800 Talk to Me 00:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please undo your against-consensus changes then, please? Thanks. — Aitias // discussion 01:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, your close is a conflict of interest anyway. — Aitias // discussion 01:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. — Aitias // discussion 01:06, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Thank you for your opinion on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mixwell. I have decided that it's too early for it. I closed it by WP:Snow. Thanks! --Mixwell!Talk 03:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the barnstar, happy to fight vandalism wherever it may be! QueenCake (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 80 support, 2 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the community has placed in me. R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:16, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]

Delivered at 04:15, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Rex Ryan

He had accepted the job when I changed his page. It's all irrelevant now though. --GroundhogTheater (talk) 17:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]